Opus or AAC?
Opus or AAC?
Owen Davis
Other urls found in this thread:
wiki.xiph.org
wiki.xiph.org
nigelcoldwell.co.uk
listening-test.coresv.net
twitter.com
Samuel Morris
MP3
Jack Richardson
Technically superior and free format or proprietary garbage?
Really jogs the old nog.
Landon Brooks
Compatibility isn't a problem anymore. Here we're talking about quality in a reduced size. I can't carry FLAC everywhere.
Jayden Roberts
If I recall correctly Opus don't support 44.1KHz natively.
Ian Thomas
Jayden Phillips
ogg
Eli Carter
192kbps MP3
Dominic Anderson
Audiophiles need the 44.1khz to play their 50,000 Kbps uncompressed Kanye West songs
Samuel Lopez
Well, MP3 VBR
John Bell
+ sizes
Parker Reyes
48kHz is "superior" (not really) to 44.1kHz you know. As the Opus wiki says, if the very tiny loss of quality that resampling has is too much for you, you have no business using a lossy codec in the first place.
Sebastian Morris
>outlaw audio types
all are the jannetty to MP3's Shawn
Carter Anderson
>No icon for FLAC files.
>WMP icon for mp3 files.
Hunter Gonzalez
It's Firefox
Isaac Hernandez
Right, a spectrogram is a total indicator of audio quality.
Jackson Thompson
It's an indicator of how little quality it lost relative to size loss.
Leo Murphy
o fuck. Allow me to commit sudoku.
Am I the only fag who notice the lack of information/distortion in the vibrations of my furniture?
Lincoln Davis
You're fucking stupid, and clearly don't understand the reason why people sometimes look at spectrograms.
You're just as fucking retarded about mpv and other video players. You should stop posting; you're embarrassing yourself.
Austin Brown
>ass blasted MemePlayerVideo user detected
Ian Hughes
ogg if you want loss flac if you want non-lossy format.also ogg sounds much better even at lower bitrates.try comparing for example the 220kb ogg with the 222kb mp3.the difference is mind blowing.USE HEADPHONES
Ayden Richardson
aac is compatible with basically anything; but really nothing matters and the size/quality thing is unimportant. i prefer uncompressed aiff
>some autistic shit by freetards or quality thing by known companies like bell labs, fraunhofer and dolby what withstood the test of time
Nathan Jones
OGG for compressed
FLAC for lossless
ALAC for homosexuals
Dylan Jackson
listening-test.coresv.net
Dumbass cuck.
Wyatt Anderson
Dumbass.
mp3 320/V0 will btfo opus 96k.
Juan Reed
Wow, a codec with 3 times the bitrate beats a different codec!
What the fucking surprise!
James Turner
Almost all audio file sharing is done in either mp3 or FLAC.
For archiving: use FLAC
For listening with quality equipment: use mp3 320kbps (or if you are audiophile, use FLAC, but I urge you to do a blind test urself and test if you can even spot which file you are listening to, most people could not differentiate between a 320kbps mp3 and an uncompressed format).
For mobile: Use mp3 128kbps
Logan Wright
Wow, in 2017 size doesnt matter!
Hudson Morgan
Yes it does. Opus was originally designed for streaming usage.
Websites want to reduce their bandwidth as much as possible, and considering a lot of you burgercucks are now getting internet data caps, size is even more important.
Also, Opus has a low algorithmic delay. It absolutely shits over everything else in latency sensitive applications.
Kayden Cox
What about WAV or AIFF, aren't those better than FLAC?
Aiden Reed
Both WAV, AIFF and FLAC are lossless formats, meaning they sound exactly as the original. From these formats FLAC is the smallest in size (also the generally accepted and used format).
Alexander Carter
>data caps
This I will say T-Mobile has your back when it comes to their Music Freedom and all.
Jose Phillips
>meaning they sound exactly as the original
Really, even if the size has been reduced?
Nolan Morgan
but nothing supports opus so it wont be streamed! and again, the difference is minor. about 30% between 96k opus and v2 mp3. effectively a few megabytes so it does not matter. while it has low delay, for these applications people will still use amr/speex/whatever because it just works and just worked for ages.
Logan Cox
Size does not equals quality. FLAC is a compressed lossless audio stream, WAV is uncompressed lossless audio stream.
Jaxson Walker
>but nothing supports opus
Opus is a feature required to be implemented for WebRTC.
Opus is used in conjunction with VP9 for WebM.
Most VOIP programs use Opus.
Colton Johnson
>For archiving: use FLAC
Not APE?
Isaiah White
Nobody uses that shit. While having a very slight better compression ratio than FLAC, the computational requirements are much higher.
Alexander Nguyen
I didn't even noticed it. You know, I can't imagine modern computers having problems with that.