Is AMD out for blood ?

is AMD out for blood ?

Other urls found in this thread:

techradar.com/news/intel-turns-up-the-dial-to-core-i9-with-new-processors
developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/cpu-development/amd-optimizing-cc-compiler/
agner.org/optimize/microarchitecture.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

2600k user here
I honestly want to see how Intel reacts to this.
Gonna be a shit show

Remember all those Core i9 housefire memes ?
It's now a thing. techradar.com/news/intel-turns-up-the-dial-to-core-i9-with-new-processors

>People meme i9 will happen cause normal fags auto assume i7 is better based on a bigger number

>Amd shit on Intel,so what does Intel do increase the number to psychologically make their new line of course look better

...

>155 watts

I'd trade 10 watts for 4.5 ghz stock clocks (instead of 3.2 ghz) and higher IPC

So the 1976X has the same amount of cores and threads, same TDP, same everything as the 1977X but with better frequency? Surely that must be wrong.

see

See

1700x and 1800x are same tdp but the 1800x has a 200mhz higher base and boost

>4.5 ghz stock clocks
Lol

They're still only going to get the "muh price per core" fags unless they can bring the IPC up by a fair margin. This is just MAEK MOAR COARS all over again.

>intel CuckPU locked down like fuck
>half the die is dedicated to AMT NSA backdoors
>bribing to ensure they stay relevant

Intel is BANKRUPT how will they EVER recover?

Corelets.

When will they learn?

Nope, 3.2 vs. 3.3. Turbo boost just won't up the clocks to 4.5 when all cores are active.

Right but in this case it's the 1976X that has the higher base clock.

>is AMD out for blood ?
I'd say yes.
developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/cpu-development/amd-optimizing-cc-compiler/

>155W

AYYMD HOUSEFIRES

AYYMD HOUSEFIRES EVERYWHERE

All of this will come to GCC anyway.

>closed-source LLVM form
>come to GCC
?

...

A 16 core Xeon @2.6Ghz is $2891.
If AMD can do a 16 core @3.5Ghz they've won the server game. Even Skylake-X Xeons aren't going to clock that high.

except those cores are legit performers this time around

Skylake X has a turbo boost of 4.5ghz without overclock you stupid nigger

>AMD 16 core 155w
>Intel 12 core 160w

Learn what Turbo is you dumb fuck.

Thats only 1 core. Intel has never been able to keep their high core chips at high clocks without resorting to one core clock ups.

easy win for workstations too, high enough clocks to be decent on lightly-threaded loads or even gaymes but a shitload of cores when you're ready to render or compile

>i dont understand how companies could try finding the highest clock they're comfortable shipping at, the post

Did you even see Ryzen get released? 3.6 base is so close to the max clock available that the end user has to push the voltages up a ton to get a small performance increase.
Why do you think intel wouldn't do the same now? It isn't going to clock to 6ghz just because they ship with a higher base clock.

Obviously fucking bait

If you guys will actually crap your pants over 10-20W power usage, you're fucking retarded.

i think 1976x is 12/24 actually.

It has and you're full of poo anyway. The upcoming Intels have a higher base clock too (3.6ghz). Also Intels are know to be overclockable past their turbo which this time is 4.5ghz on a 12 core chip. Amd already overclocks the shit out of their chips, so you're stuck below 3.9ghz for the upcoming server CPU

Are you stupid or retarded?

Intel 140W, AYYMD 155W

AYYMD is a HOUSEFIRES

Don't forget ayymd cpoos can't clock for poo and have poo ipc

poo poo poo poo
just don't give him his fucking replies

but amd's 12 core is 125w not 155w

I wonder what will be the price of 1998X. That's a dream workstation/compile processor.

>overclocking server CPUs

(((((155w)))))

...

And 3.0 ghz clock

AMD has higher IPC and none of the 12cores will go as high as 4.5Ghz

If you have 2000 of x chip running youre now talking 40000w

>Also Intels are know to be overclockable past their turbo which this time is 4.5ghz on a 12 core chip
7700k at stock clocks has tdp similar to 1700x. 12 cores at 4.5GHz will have 500W tdp or something like that. LN2 cooled datacenters.

and 3.2ghz too

6900k is 140w TDP, goes as high as 198.
Most important thing to note is TYPICAL

>AMD has higher IPC

>AMD has higher IPC
This is what AMDniggers actually believe

>tdp = power consumption

Not a chance you stupid street shitterAmd advertises their poo as low TDP but in reality it's a housefire

Suspiciously missing the 1700 there are you?

agner.org/optimize/microarchitecture.pdf

Skylake-X is fucking DOA

>benchmark vs reddit blog
Totally convinced me

(You) tried. Now fuck off.

>Benchmark without context vs Scientific paper by Technical University of Denmark
>Chooses Benchmark
Sup Forums - logically insufficient.

Go away 14xxxx.jpg

(You)

Calculated by sysmark performance?

I like these threads

tis gonna be gud

So Intel not only has inferior IPC but also shittier cores since AMD 8 core in on par with Intel 10 core

LOL

TDP is rough average workload.

Excel workload is that high because its the fastest of all those CPU.

The fact that 1700x consumes roughly same power as 5960x shows how efficient the Ryzen is because 1700x beats out 5960x on Excel load bench.

>Skylake-X all core turbo is 4.5

Yeah, if TDP is 500W
You must be some special kind of retard to believe this, why do you think their 28 core is only 2.5GHz?

>amd is superios to intel

Lul no

Yes. Welcome to 2017.

Intel is complete shit in gayming tho

>software with 1long and 6short instructions works better on hardware that is specified to do that

Now show software that sends all the long instructions, and see Intel shit the pants.

>4 core less clocked poozen DESTROYS 6 core overclocked poozen

Why is amd so shit?

Choose a game street shitter

Here we gooo

Maybe you should all stop replying to him?

He talks to himself a lot.

Sup Forums is too retarded to figure it out.

Netburst 2.0 apologists inbound

>Game
What about, V-ray?
Games are shit software, they are fast and dirty and most of the game devs don't care about scalability, they care about finishing their project and moving on to a next one.

>IT'S GAMES FAULT
>IT'S WINDOWS FAULT
>IT'S NVIDIAS FAULT
>IT'S RAMS FAULT
>IT'S DXS FAULT
>IT'S INTELS FAULT

Or maybe your CPUs are just shit?

>directx11 day one benchmarks

corelets, when will they learn

IMG_XXXX has to be the clown of Sup Forums

Maybe we all should report him so mods would stop sucking cocks and ban him?

>Sup Forums - Tech Illiterates
Why don't you go find another consumer thread, you seem to be interested in that more than actual technology.

>Day 1

It's a Linus review from last week you deluded shitskin

I'm reporting him, don't know about the other faggots.
Considering how quick they're to respond to bait they're probably straight from reddit or underage too.

Wait for Cannonlake.

Why don't you go shill your piece of shit on reddit? That's where your fellow poojets hang around

Sure, what ever you say.
Now shoo.

Not gonna work, if they ban me they also have to ban this 14xxxx.jpg amd shitskin shill

They should ban what? UNIX timestamps?

>muh boost clocks
will be thermally throttled anyway.

Only if you use a piece of shit amd wraith cooler

>any amount of time will make nvidia drivers suddenly stop becoming shit
kek, oh wait, you're serious

See

155W HOUSEFIRES

>155watts for 3.0ghz

There's no destruction anywhere, its 3% difference.

But MUH gaymen

If you buy your CPU based on video game benchmarks then you're a fucking retard anyways, unless you're playing at 1080p@60fps with a 1080 Ti

60fps only if you play with poozen. 7700k with a 1080ti @1080 will get you around 800fps

In games like CS:GO, Dota, LOL