You heard the man. Sell your Bitecoins now before it's too late...

You heard the man. Sell your Bitecoins now before it's too late. Or the goverment will ban it and arrest you for trading illegal digital contraband.

You've been warned.

Other urls found in this thread:

npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/05/15/528439968/wannacry-ransomware-microsoft-calls-out-nsa-for-stockpiling-vulnerabilities
infoworld.com/article/2608141/internet-privacy/snowden--the-nsa-planted-backdoors-in-cisco-products.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>stop using bitcoins t. old man
>people keep using bitcoins
>government legally stops people from selling bitcoins
>people keep trading bitcoins and just trade for cash under the table making it even less traceable

>Trying to pump and dump
You missed your board faggot Also
>Trying to stop a non-centralized thing
Ayy lmao

Bitcoin is old news anyways. It's run into the same problems that non-fiat money did during the 1800s.

yes yes, goyim. Please stop using Bite coin!

What happens in the case that bitcoin becomes illegal and the worst case scenario happens where nobody wants to trade cash money for coin anymore?
Is monetary value just lost to the ether?

As long as demand exists people will be mining it. Thus why coin hoarders are always shilling for it.

>If you don't stop this
lol

>make untraceable transactions illegal
>try to enforce it
>by golly gee we just can't trace these transactions

I could just exchange it with a korean ezchsnge website since bitcoin has a pretty decent foothold there.

If they make it illegal it would probably send the value plummeting since rich assholes would be less likely to invest in it.

Youd think they ban paper money first, that gets stolen more often and is completely untracable.

don't terrorists demand [insert currency here]? maybe we should ban that, too.

Ok I will "sell" it
>trade it to a better alt coin

we monero now
problem solved faggot

bitcoin is not untracable you faggot

Of course the statists want to blame Bitcoin instead of blaming their precious NSA.
Yes I totally agree with that man, the NSA is a criminal organization!
The NSA hid the exploit, and is likely stockpiling many more. They are literally just sitting their waiting for organizations like the Shadow Brokers to hack them and get the vulnerabilities.
npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/05/15/528439968/wannacry-ransomware-microsoft-calls-out-nsa-for-stockpiling-vulnerabilities
The real thing to blame here is the NSA, which I agree should be banned as illegal contraband. Not Bitcoin.

Microsoft is ultimately the problem. The state is not responsible for debugging microshit's code. If they want free help they should make it open source.

Why are white liberals so insistent on banning things they don't understand?

>governments outlaw bitcoins
>people have huge amount of bitcoins they can't exchange for conventional money
>people just start paying with bitcoins
>conventional money dissappears
Well, that certainly didn't go as planned

>mfw this was the plan all along

>fbi malware "leaked"
>malware somehow infects EVERYONE
>hits especially hard in asian countries, a place known for a fact to receive regular shipments of us gov. backdoored routers*
>malware demands bitcoin
>government now allowed to ban bitcoin


WELL
FUCKING
PLAYED
YOU
CIA NIGGERS


*infoworld.com/article/2608141/internet-privacy/snowden--the-nsa-planted-backdoors-in-cisco-products.html

bitcoin was always criminal coin
there is literally no other advantage to it. its slow as all fuck too

>b-b-but we'll take down the banks
seriously nigger?

Shit man, the USD is obviously illegal! Oh fuck!

the eternal seppo is mad that there's a pie out there without their government finger in it

fuck 'em, buttcoin is legally an asset where i live, not a currency

>the worst case scenario happens where nobody wants to trade cash money for illegal items
Yeah, good luck with that buddy

White conservatives like to ban things they don't understand too.

>untraceable
>every transaction made is right there in the ledger
What did he mean by this?

He's right.

The more criminal activity is publicly associated with bitcoin the less desirable they will become to people who will actually trade real money for them and then their value will plummet.

agreed. white people in general are the problem, as always

You mean people haven't already moved over to litecoin?

>write ransomware
>demand 500$ in BigMacs
>BigMacs are now illegal

>"The recent ransomware demands money to be sent to this bank account..."
>"Ayy, sell your eurobucks, goy."
>"They will be illegal soon."
Seriously?

If bitcoin gets outlawed its price will fucking skyrocket.

Like how drugs were associated with criminals and the value of drugs plummeted, right?

without bitcoin the hacker would just delete everything, for max damage and lol

>the result of your children not getting proper education in Logical Reasoning and Basic Economics, and then growing up into senile retards

ITT: it's 2015

Yet there is nothing more conservative these days as the anti-sex puritanism which feminism, an allegedly liberal religious sect, is pushing and forcing.
The objectification spiel is directly from the playbook of Abrahamic religions, to whom sexual morality is unique and isn't found outside of this cultural sphere.

as long as you can buy drugs with bitcoin, bitcoin will have value.

I disagree that the NSA should be removed. Under the NSA are an entire army of highly skilled computer security specialists, who will look for employment if the NSA is dissolved. They will find their way into commercial bug-seeking and selling entities, like that italian hacking firm that sold the iOS exploit to the FBI. Or they'll get moved to the CIA's hacking division, and the CIA is WORSE than the NSA when it comes to breaking shit. Much worse.
This doesn't help.

Instead, the NSA should have its focus changed from offense to defense. It should be finding computer bugs and fixing them in major crucial systems, instead of finding them and sitting on them. Terrorists are not a threat compared to cyber criminals and other nation states. Terrorism in the future will be ransomware or some shit if this doesn't change.

The NSA needs to be improving the security of the nation instead of decreasing it.

Good thing "legal" currency is never used in illegal activities.

every single human being that ever existed fears what they don't understand. it is a primal instinct.

It's still a fiat currency. Just decentralized.

Do you even know what fiat currency is?

Don't forget to ban cars because criminals use them to escape, kidnap, kill, and rob people with.

>armed robbers prefer high performance audis as getaway cars
>so we'll fucking SWAT you if you drive an high performance audi

Yes, looks like an absolutely reasonable logic

We should ban the Nevada desert so criminals can't dump bodies there anymore.

>He doesn't get it
wow, ok let me spell it out for you then:
If someone made a ransomware and told people to transfer to a bank account, the bank account would be closed immediately and the owner arrested.

But what if the owner was me, Kike Shekelworth?
Thought so.

It's currency that makes bad cars

Bigger Kikesteins who lose money because of your hoodinkery would cut your balls off.

>old ass baby boomer dinosaur wants to ban something he doesn't understand because of criminals committing crime that has nothing to do with the average bitcoin holder

boomerposting has gone too far

Oy vey, DELETE this now, goy.
I am reporting you to Modberg for independent thoughts.

It's what you'd expect, no?

Dictatorships, cartels and other assholes can fund their despicable terror torture rape repression abuse organizations with US dollars.

But that's certainly not as scary or worth doing anything against as that oh so uncontrollable "Bitcoin" thing that is used for a call for ransom on data (which is even only relevant when you have really shitty IT).

That's the most retarded comparison

The real value is in the mac sauce

>old ass baby boomer dinosaur wants to ban something he doesn't understand

You just described most of the US government.

It's currency whose value is based on nothing but opinion.

So i'm a pet coin who do something. Good to know.

Bitcoin wallets cannot be tied to an individual, technically speaking. It's possible to track the purchase, sale, and transfer of bitcoins, but it's not possible to know who is in possession of the coins beyond the initial purchase and final sale. So all you need to do is send bitcoins through a tumbler service, then transfer them between a few wallets of your own and it's impossible for anyone to know that you have them and what you do with them.

maybe pet coins will be the new pet rocks? coins are cuter

>what you think will happen

"LEL YOU CAN'T PROVE I HAVE IT"

"Damn, we'll just have to let him go"

>What will actually happen

"LEL YOU CAN'T PROVE I HAVE IT"

"We know exactly where and when you bought them and to what address, and since blockchain entries are public record we know you transferred them all to another address to try and hide them, which proves intent. Enjoy prison rape, fucko"

Buttcoin is not anonymous when all exchanges are required to collect ID by the government.