What do Chileans think of Pinochet? Was his rule necessary?

What do Chileans think of Pinochet? Was his rule necessary?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=zhrYY3ocQ5o
youtube.com/watch?time_continue=34&v=Kf9CQPi8Oz0
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feldman–Mahalanobis_model
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

based pinochet

shit of course. there's no such thing as a "good dictatorship".

throwing commies off helicopters is pretty based

As a South Korean I can agree

I recently found out that pinochet had some ancestors from a city near my place, which led two families with the name Pinochet to be a kinda persecuted

that's because you are barely human.

t. Commie

Pinochet did nothing wrong, he did what he had to and he's the reason Chile is practically first-world today.

Please Refer to this song about the Great Man:

youtube.com/watch?v=zhrYY3ocQ5o

I'm not commie m8. but if you were intelligent enough you'd realize killing people is not ok

Freedom aint free, Blood must be spilt for great liberty.

You can thank Based Pinochet for why your country where it is today. Take a look at Venezuela or some other shit socialist shithole, that could be you right now.

G*d Bless based Pinochet.

ok b8

Absolutely, we needed to kick the commies out.

The only thing wrong he did was no killing enough communists.

Most of people don't like him because two reasons:
1. He killed 200.000 commies. And even if you thing that was necessary, or even a good thing, he did that during the first 3 years of his regime. He stayed for 17
2. He stole a lot of money and properties for his family, like A LOT

Not b8 at all, he literally made your country great

theme song
youtube.com/watch?time_continue=34&v=Kf9CQPi8Oz0

>Was his rule necessary?

No. Allende wanted to call to elections and be removed by popular vote, the coup had been in motion since 1968, but it wasnt until 1970 that got support from outside power.

Allende failed hard and was terrible, but Pinochet reign wasnt possitive. Pinochet wasnt even part of the planning he joined at the very last minute.

Pinochet was just an angry dog that the elite could control, blamming the coup on the military is just plain wrong. Also if there's something fgood all chileans will say about pinochet is that he had top tier Style.

>he literally made your country great

sure, but only for the top 10% of chile.

>2. He stole a lot of money and properties for his family, like A LOT
No surprise here. Right-wingers are corrupt pieces of shit.

>No surprise here. Right-wingers are corrupt pieces of shit.

As opposed to socialist cucks?

>Right-wingers are corrupt pieces of shit.
But Left-wingers who pretend to stand up against corruptions are no less corrupt

He didnt imply that.

Allende had ideals, Pinochet just wanted power.

True desu, but if we had a better healthcare system and 3 times our current income this country would be great

>let me tell you about your country

Are you implying that I need to somehow live somewhere in order to know a lot about it?

freedom is a spook

>killing people is not ok
Its ok if its commies.My country would have been much better if that commie Nehru had beem killed by the Brits

Yeah, it shows that you know a lot about it

You're a fucking expert on Chile after reading all those threads about Pinochet on Sup Forums

Aren't you the poster that cried when a right wing government was implemented in Slovakia

If Pinochet had'nt killed that commie Chile would have been just another Venezuela.Its not Sup Forums shitposting.That commie was going to nationalize many industries which would have been devastating to the Chile economy

Singapore is calling.

Your country is a shithole precisely because of this mindset

Havel has led a dialogue with a communist regime, even though they put him in prison

USA is calling

>If Pinochet had'nt killed that commie Chile would have been just another Venezuela

No, also, Pinochet did nothing to change the nationalization of metal.

Okay?

t. freedom hater

Tbh if you literally hate democracy then move to Saudi Arabia. Pinochet and the U.S. illegally toppled a democratically elected government to establish a dictatorship, and if you honestly think that this can be justified you are retarded.

There are no based dictators. FREEDOM HATERS OUT

No, we still have a left-wing government

Is Britain a shithole because of Clement Attlee?

If you're killing commies it doesn't matter you red bastard.

>he still believes in /MSG/ and /GMO/ memes

Love him, don't believe the commies claiming he's mostly hated, he's still very divisive and has a lot of supporters despite of age, sex or class.

The world would be better off if your country didn't exist.

It's a shithole because they tried to implement a socialist government leading to serve corruption and incompetence

>you have freedom of thought and conscience, but only if you agree with me!

Basically you.

How is "Democracy" freedom?

Democracy is mob rule.

Polls shows about 20% of Chileans view him favorably.

true

If freedom means turning your country into a shithole then I see no problem in going against it.

One of you guys cried like a bitch and pms' d all over this board because a "Nazi" party got elected

India wouldn't be much better either way.

Only idiots or cocky people believe they can predict 70 years of history based upon one event.

>There are no based dictators
>

No they ran a socialist government until the fall of the ussr. Legit communist parties were in charge of several states there

He's one of the greatest chilean heroes. Only edgy pathetic teens wouldnt agree

>Your country is a shithole precisely because of this mindset
Very few share this mindset.If they had Nehru family would'nt be the most powerful political family here
Also its been decades and India did'nt removed the socialist label from its constitution
>Even though they put him in prison
Good we still allowed them to keep on living ordinary lives

We could use a Pinochet right about now.

Freedom means a state that operates based on the consent of the governed and is firmly under the control of the people.

So democracy.

Assblasted commies damage control

And you call yourself an American. Disgraceful desu.

It's interesting, but I never see leftists defending Stalinism here

It's always these right-wingers with their fantasies about fascism

>Is Britain a shithole because of Clement Attlee?
When Clement Atlee became leader Britain was already an industrialised superpower.You are actually comparing a industrialised superpower with a newly born developing country?

If there was one thing in which the USSR succeeded, it was a rapid industrialisation

I seer then defending Stalinism all the time in irl and on the internet

*see them

>If there was one thing in which the USSR succeeded, it was a rapid industrialisation
>can build missiles and shits but can't build cars electronics and other products

>leftists defending Stalinism here
Lurk Moar
Also Stalinism because there is no such thing as Stalinism.Its just a general label used to wrap up all the policies done by Stalin.
Fascism is a more solid philosophy and hence easier to criticise.
Also 90% of people who are accused of being Fascists are not

If you are trying argument go do your research
The Nehru model failed because he tried to bring forth the same Rapid Industrialisation and Planned Economy that Stalin did under a democratic government
And it failed spectacularly.That kind of socialised development is more harder to implement on a democratic state

Here's his development model
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feldman–Mahalanobis_model
USSR industrialisation succeeded because it had tighter control over the country

>fascism is a coherent ideology
wew
Nvm it has about twenty definitions

Yep, there were some fields in which they were excellent and in another stone age tier, but it was incomparable to Imperial Russia

Less than 50% of the right has a favorable image of him

Don't mind me just posting memes.

>red blue and white
That was made by someone from santiago

>it has about twenty definitions
And your point being?There are almost 100 definitions for Marxism a more solid philosophy than both Fascism and Stalinism

>Also another criticism is that a country to use this model would have to be large enough to contain all the raw resources needed to be sustainable, so therefore this would not apply to smaller countries.

That may have been another reason why it worked in the Soviet Union and not in India

>they put him in prison
>thats all we did guys
Your point being?We allowed them to keep doing their jobs as they want and did nothing to them,not even considering bringing them to a court.Just elected them out of rule and nothing else.

>India
>Small country with limited resources
Its another subcontinent for a reason.It would'nt be as large as Russia of course but it has more resources than your country which I have never heard of until last week and even Chile

Pinochet lost a lot of face once because ppl found out all the millions he stole.

The most prominent view is that the coup was inevitable but the shit they did afterward was scummy and they did it for personal gain.

So basically he was a thief desu.

Just checked.ITs the 7th biggest and thats not even taking into consideration Pakistan and Bangladesh which had been part of India and given away to muslims by that cuck Nehru

My point was that Russian is a much more resource rich country than India and so they didn't need that much of foreign trade

>We assume a closed economy.

But climate change isn't real, user

What about the population?

And what are you trying to defend?If you are the same guy who first started out with an argumnent about my country is a shithole because ,then what are you even trying to prove?

It was a hyperbole ofc and a reaction to your post that your country would be better off if Nehru was killed.

You can't pinpoint something like that on a single reason, but if a sentiment like that becomes prevalent then it doesn't lead to a good future or healthy society.

They were elected into the national assembly, not the government.

And that one event lasted from 1947 to 1991(Even the Chinese opened up their economy 2 decades before).I know you are just a buttblasted commie who is now resorting to Sup Forums memes because you can't believe 'Beloved Democratic Socialism' can never fall but still do your research before shitposting and making yourself look lke a fool
Population wasn't considered a problem at that time.Also waht are you now trying to do?Defending or arguing against Socialism?I started out against Socialism and now you are telling me why Socialism won't work?

No, communists put Havel in prison (they did a lot of even worse things) and despite that he pursued reconciation for the good of the country

Havel was a monumental piece of shit.

>your country would be better off if Nehru was killed
Actually I was just shitposting and you are the one who took me seriously.If Nehru,a Democratic Socialist had been killed the other alternative was a Marxist Leninist,which would have made things worse.
>if a sentiment like that becomes prevalent
If it had been would'nt have happened until 2015

>India's Area if Nehru had'nt been a cuck

>There are no based dictators.

Rousseau, the man who largely inspired that revolution pictured would disagree.

Economy is still dependent on copper, unemployment and infant death skyrocketed.

Allende did nothing wrong.

Bolivia current has a socialist president and it's economy is growing. btw, Venezuela isn't socialist. There are still private companies in Venezuela.