This is where we wait for the latest AMD graphics card which AMD will surely release in a timely manner and will definitely blow all of our minds, no questions asked, 100% guaranteed, no chance it'll fail, just you wait.
>COMPUTEX LAUNCH CONFIRMED More like Founders Edition paper launch confirmed.
Also the fact they try and advertise it to professionals means that they probably wont beat the Titan Xp
Easton Sanders
just wait
Caleb Morris
You could have at least posted the interesting shit he said on libbit
Benjamin Martin
>CANT WAIT FOR MUH VIDYEO GAEMS Literally all wait-let fags
Brayden Clark
Hynix could have made enough HBM2 for hundreds of thousands of Vega GPUs just since that rumor started going around.
Lucas Wright
Who care about Titan Xp? I want a card of 1080/Ti level with competitive price. Its all comes down to the price of Vega gpus.
Caleb Reed
IM LITERALLY SHAKING
Aaron Martin
>We’ll be showing Radeon RX Vega off at Computex, but it won’t be on store shelves that week.
POO IN THE LOO O O
Luke Adams
POO IN THE GPU
Josiah Brown
>Who care about Titan Xp? It would be a complete marketing failure to try and sell a 1080ti level GPU after 1080ti release for premium cost with a fucking blower cooler.
Michael Fisher
>rebbit
James Johnson
Go to VideoCardz your fucking self, asshole.
Angel Rivera
Couldn't AMD rerelease Fury something with more clocks and memory in 2016 if they planned for Vega to hit in 2017?
Eli Rodriguez
was listening mr Tech Deals and Joker talk about Vega being late and problems with manufacturing. That if they plan to release in June they should have been built 3 months earlier.... And since they already had working units in December that there shouldn't be production issues.
i have no faith in AMD and they will likely botch the release with inadequate supplies, but it would be great for them if they go to Computex and pull an E3 trick. "This is Vega and its available *long pause* now"
Grayson Robinson
...
Ryan Peterson
>"We’ll be showing Radeon RX Vega off at Computex, but it won't be on store shelves that week"
Matthew Myers
>Expect Vega on store shelves by December 31, 2017 at the latest!
Juan Thomas
They've confirmed full release of consumer Vega before the end of next month.
AMD knows that the main reason people buy their products is solely because they aren't the competitor. AMD knows that the longer they don't release their product, the less they will disappoint and the more hype they will build up. Then after finally releasing it, and it not meeting expectations at all, they will still buy it because "Well shit I've been waiting a year and a half I'm just gonna get it anyway". AMD will hold this off as long as they can I've been screenshotting Vega posts since January so this time around those watifags can't lie and say "nobody said it would be X performance, I see nothing wrong here we completely expected Y performance" happens everytime
Henry Sanchez
Yeah, it won't be available for purchase at Computex, which is May 30th. I said by the end of next month, shill.
Gabriel Robinson
limited, and why you call me a ''shill''??
Jayden Anderson
Ryzen absolutely blew the fuck out of all expectations. Intel's HEDT lineup is dead, and the only processors worth buying are the 7600k and 7700k. An easy OC on a 1700 or 1600 will give you similar single core performance with twice as many cores.
Kevin Powell
I've see posts saying both, you can find idiots supporting literally any claim.
Lincoln Wilson
>limited Hey look, it's that same shitty rumor. Hynix and Samsung could put out enough HBM2 for 16,000 Vega dies in a weekend, or less. There will be more than 16,000 Vega cards available at launch and anyone who still believes that rumor is an idiot or a shill.
Jayden Roberts
>Vega is gonna be shit >R-Ryzen Ok bud
Cooper Nguyen
>16,000 Vega dies >in a weekend >in a weekend >in a weekend
[Citation needed]
Logan Howard
>RYZEN WILL BE SKYLAKE SINGLE CORE WITH EIGHT CORES FOR UNDER 400 >I see no issue here we fully expected haswell levels single core performance this is a great deal Wish I screenshotted those posts
Dominic Taylor
Depends only about the price of this shit.
Aaron White
SK Hynix puts out a million wafers a month. 16,000 Vega dies is 32,000 HBM2 stacks, which is less than 3 300mm^2 wafers.
Mason Wright
yeah if this "shit" is gonna be as cheap as ryzen vs intel then It be le interesting hehe :^) lulz memes.
Isaac Fisher
[Citation needed]
Liam Murphy
AMD WAIT™
Christopher Hill
The post I quoted was saying AMD never lives up to the hype. Clearly, Ryzen did.
The general consensus was Haswell IPC with 4-8 cores and SMT. No one expected such low TDP or to be able to OC and achieve Skylake IPC or more, and no one expected Ryzen to kill Intel's HEDT lineup.
Asher Hill
>no one expected >no one I guess someone lost memory of last 365 days...
Leo Carter
Ryzen didn't live up to the hype at all Did you even bother reading the hype about it? It was supposed to blow Intel out of the water, destroy all of their processors In reality it did nothing, Intel is still growing strong and releasing fuck all cause they didn't get the competition they should have
James Nelson
10/10
Kayden Phillips
>skylake ipc It's not even close though are you high?
Blake White
how do you expect me to bite with nothing good on the hook? ive got 500 babies to feed raja
Carson Parker
Sorry, don't know where I got three from, the number is 50 wafers. HBM2 is 7.75mmx11.87mm die, you can get 650 dies from a 300mm^2 die.
Benjamin Brooks
>Ryzen lived up to the hype Where have you been living these past 5 years?
Logan Bailey
Did you even read what I posted above? Have you been paying attention? The only Intel processors worth buying are the 7600k and 7700k, and with a slight OC the cheaper 1700 and 1600 match them in single core performance. Anyone willing to do a little bit of research before they buy will buy AMD this generation.
Brayden Hernandez
>Clearly, Ryzen did Stockholm syndrome
Camden Johnson
The 1700 overclocked does not match the single core performance of a 7700k Nice try though pajeet, nobody is buying Ryzen outside of AMD fans AMD needs to do a whole lot better with Zen+, then maybe I'll consider getting a team red account like you
Julian Phillips
Compare the Ryzen 7 1700 at 4GHz to the 6700k, they trade blows.
Carson Davis
zen+ will be zen +5% higher clockrate. Basically what they did with RX580 and other rebrands
>more cores beats less cores in physics tests Congratulations raja what a fair comparison of IPC Stupid fuck
Kayden Campbell
Oh look, seven entirely evidence free shillposts about Ryzen. Feel free to hop over to for 50+ benchmarks BTFO'ing your kiketel shekelchasing, but I'd prefer not to derail this one into the same argument.
Dylan Johnson
Cow got your tongue?
Eli Williams
>Stupid shils JEW JEW JEW >Links to a thread full of counter shills Not too bright are you? Gotta have other people make your arguments for you by spamming cherry picked benchmarks like they do every single thread? >SKYLAKE IPC >SEE LOOK AT THIS PROOF OF MY ROCKET LEAGUE BENCHMARKS WHERE RYZEN IS 20 FPS BEHIND
Robert Young
>COMPUTEX LAUNCH CONFIRMED
He literally explicitly said they weren't launching at computex and weren't launching the same week as computex.
holy fuck do you people even listen or read
Henry Taylor
>Yet more evidence free shillposting
Elijah Cooper
I'm pretty sure this is what happened and will happen:
>We'll beat the 1080 with this >Nvidia shits out the 1080ti >Holy fuck how did they do that delay delay >We'll beat the 1080ti with this >Computex announcement >launch 2 months later >Volta arrives same time >btfo AMD anyways
Brody Sanchez
you know those people literally have a specific folder of cherry picked benchmarks for Ryzen despite every other source showing those benchmarks to be incorrect right mods are banning these people for de-railing threads and spamming images of the same shit, they do it everywhere >Post a graph of intel performing better SHILL SHILL SHILL FALSE >Post graph of AMD performing better HAHAHAHA INTEL BTFO
You guys gotta grow up, if anyone is shilling it's you, because you clearly put in alot more effort of spending five hours posting graphs over and over
Michael Gutierrez
You haven't posted any evidence at all of the 1700 having the same IPC as a 6700k at 4ghz Fucking moron, hang yourself back at funnyjunk
Isaiah Watson
check out people running single instructions through ryzen to get the actual ipc
ryzen's equal or beating intel in ipc - the only thing dragging them down are optimizations and intel's compiler bullshit
Elijah Miller
>volta >2017 you got to go back
Chase Perry
>Posting evidence is bad >Instead you should make hundreds of evidence free crying wojak "POO POO POO" shitposts a week. (You)
Aiden Evans
Never even said anything about wojaks kid, that was you projecting. Someone spent five hours cherry picking benchmarks and posting them on a columbian thumb wrestling board and you have the balls to call me a shill? You were right, my apologies, too late to delete my previous IPC posts as to not confuse others
Nicholas Martin
You cannot cannot "cherry pick" 50+ benchmarks showing results in 50-100 different applications. At that point it's simply showing the majority of benchmarked workloads.
Aiden Rogers
Two different products and two different divisions, there is no guarantee VEGA will exceed expectations.
>after finally releasing it, and it not meeting expectations at all, they will still buy it because "Well shit I've been waiting a year and a half I'm just gonna get it anyway" I'd run of patience and say fuck it when desperate for an upgrade, bought a 980 on impulse because it was on sale and needed a better GPU after 390X(confused with Fury at the time) was delayed, happy I did that at the time considering how long it took to manage to find a Fury in stock and 390X released 2 months later and ended up being very close performance and cost wise so it didn't really matter.
Solid 4K 60fps on Ultra without AA for recent demanding DX11 titles is my desired target, even 1080Ti cannot achieve this level of performance for demanding titles so I don't have my hopes up. I am not in a rush to upgrade now, so hopefully this time around they'd have enough Vegas in stock at launch. If it fails to meet expectations then there is a fat chance I'd buy their product and just wait on Volta.
Julian Sullivan
It's pretty easy to cherry pick 50 graphs out of thousands of benchmarks to prove your point See here I can show the 7700k beating the 1800x in IPC It's incredibly easy
Nolan Reed
Unless you want a gpu for mining, you're in for getting a shiny new GPU with bad drivers that can't play games. Go away corporate shills.
Wyatt Gomez
See here too I can show the 7700k shitting on the $500 1800x in an AMD sponsored game It's really really easy to cherry pick to show what you want. I've gotten to the point where I just don't even fucking listen to any benchmarks anymore, none of them are accurate
Leo Rivera
Next.
Nolan Miller
So, if your argument is that one can cherry pick and infinite number of benchmarks to prove any point, then there is no point to continuing this discussion since, by your definition, no evidence can be produced to support any argument or conclusion and I have no interest in evidence free screeching.
John Cox
>4.2GHz base >3.6GHz base
Owen Gray
>gpu thread >talk about cpu
Dominic Sullivan
>YOU HAVE TO UNDERCLOCK THE CPU FOR IT TO BE FAIR No Yeah, pretty much, all benchmarks are wrong, trust nothing, never ever Here is the 1800x losing in ashes of the singularity It's incredibly easy to find benchmarks proving each sides argument of being better. Yet somehow Intel is always the shill and AMD is always the correct side? In reality both are fucking retarded and why are we trusting any of these people if they all get such skewed results?
Nathan Fisher
Look at that, an 1800X at 3.9GHz wins vs. a 7700k at 4.2GHz. That means more ipc.
Jayden Hill
Why are we talking about games now? We are still on the topic of IPC, aren't we?
Isn't that also a day one benchmark? Keep up with the times, user.
Jackson Bell
Here's another.
Sebastian Perez
Well, when the vast majority of benchmarks show one thing, and a minority show the opposite thing under specific circumstances which can be logically explained, I think it becomes pretty clear who is shilling and who is trying to use evidence to support a conclusion.
Joshua Cooper
And another.
Tyler Thomas
Last one.
John Jones
Now enough of gaymes. This is Sup Forums.
Ian Stewart
Um read again user
Cameron Bell
See, you're doing the exact same thing, posting the exact same cherry picked benchmarks as the other thread This is just pathetic
Justin Taylor
lol can you spell "cherry picked"?
but whatever, ryzen is exciting but i built myself a lightroom/photoshop box and intel was better for my situation. still very exciting to see whats coming. cant wait to see intels move and zen2 and how it all unfolds. fucking delicious
Justin Cooper
Oh vey! There are two shill on this board now, Inshill-kun.
Do you have the benchmarks to prove me wrong?
John Garcia
The vast majority show Ryzen performing worse Literally the only benchmarks showing Ryzen performing better are posted here on Sup Forums Surprisingly even r/AMD isn't this bad Minimum may may Minimum may may Conveniently cutting out all the benchmarks from that page showing Ryzen doing worse
Colton Gonzalez
[Citation Needed]
Caleb Peterson
And you just resort to the old jew joke and calling me a shill You are doing an incredibly job at proving every single point I made above Here is a good benchmark that even disproves your stutter lie
Jose Hall
>He wants a stuttering mess
Jose Edwards
Ok here is a citation for you Or is this incorrect and cherry picked?
David Wood
>All intel chips using slower ram than their Ryzen counterpart really joggin my noggin
Joseph Reed
>170 FPS max >89 FPS average >38 FPS minimum >Implying that isn't a stuttering housefire Kek.
Robert Clark
>One game >In DX12 >On an Nvidia card >Pretending like everyone doesn't already know Nvidia's DX12 driver's bottleneck Ryzen CPUs
Jose Myers
>2400MHz Ryzen still less of a stuttering housefire than a 10-core i7
Thomas Mitchell
...
Adrian Baker
Buddy, can you relax a little bit? You're starting to act like IMG_xxxx.jpg here, and I don't want to get accused of being you when benchmarks are relevant.
Jayden Morgan
>I'm telling you those evil nvidias are gimping our Ryzen performance Grow up Remember when you faggots threw a huge hissy fit over Ryzen using slower Ram in benchmarks
William Torres
Sorry, I can't help it.
Kek. Seems like it's been switched around.
Chase Gutierrez
See, here benchmarks are relevant because they show direct evidence for Nvidia drivers bottlenecking Ryzen performance in DX12.
Ayden Scott
Hence my point I don't give a shit about the memory speed I was just fucking around Little old throwback to "MUH RAM SPEED"