What would run better in 1.5gb ram, w7 or 10?

What would run better in 1.5gb ram, w7 or 10?

Other urls found in this thread:

tiny.slitaz.org/)
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Gentoo

Could he not just cut the butter into smaller pieces?

Gentoo or some other Linux distro.

You overestimate ja/ck/.

I recognize that ring.

go ba/ck/ ja/ck/!

Lubuntu

sorry i dont know

10

Jack is one of a kind

Neither

Get 8 gigs of ram you fucking poorfag

>all that butter
why?

Oishe

Mmmmmm....E. coli.

puppy linux

This

win 2000

for chocolate

8.1 desu (32 bits)

Win 95

10 fo' sure!

The one that does not come with 3D printing software, a store ,2 browsers, mobile programs, and a bunch of windows 8 leftovers in the in C:/Windows

OP here, this is the VM im porting to the dumpster computer, looks like it will be fine

I might use 2gb if I memtest some 512mb sticks I have around and can stick them into my little seedbox and remove 1gb from it

Who dat qt

Thw windows 10 LTSB you mean?

Windows 7 would run better on anything when compared to 10.

>windows 10 RTM

Wow, such a prof

wallpaper please.
Galko

xubuntu

Win7 stripper and disable some junk and you'd get a little faster, right?

Kubuntu

but 10 actually

No

That's american cooking alright, fucking inbreds

Where's my sandwich?
W7 or a light distro

Well, everything werking and I can play 1080p BD video with no frame drops or issues out of my dumpster GPU trying to start a housefire, I need to fix the cooler fan, its unplugged

And maybe change this shitt pentium E for a e6700

Also, MPV is stuttering like a motherfucker, MPC werks fine, I will try madvr settings now

10 LTSB

Also specs

this

XP.

/thread

You have worse problems to worry about than the operating system your computer runs.

Wow, a O.S I can only use to show Sup Forums I have it

FOOKING WARM UP THE BUTTER you stupid fucking cunt. 30 second, 500 watt microwave.
JESUS

You microwaved the butter and then you fold it in with a spatula. After it's been uniformly distributed is THEN when you use a mixer.

Windows 98 SE runs like a beast with 1.5GB of RAM.
It's fucking impressive

Yeah and in 128mb too, its a fucking O.S for pentium 3 ages, that guy already have windows 10 working

Win 98 need 12mb of ram and a 66mhz processor

>What would run butter in 1.5gb ram, w7 or 10?

The main issue here is eating butter miexed with chocolate powder

I tried W7 on 1.5 GB RAM and it was shit.

I've yet to try Win10 on it. Maybe if I disable all animations it might work.

That's why you let butter come up to room temperature.

Win10 should be better.
It's designed to run on 2GB tablets

Trash. I can boot 7 with less than 300MB used RAM. Can't do that on 10, nor disable DWM.

I'd guess Windows 10.

But you probably just want to run Linux.

Windows 10 [spoiler]Mobile[/spoiler]

Trash.
I can boot Linux with less than 8MB ram.

Linux easily does that too, but unlike Windows 98 it can run 64 bit x86, it will use muh cores, it will not choke on just about any and all IO...

Win98 was simple, but it was still 1/3 as retarded as Win3.11. Which was VERY retarded.

And I'm sure all the programs will run fine. All those eight or so programs available.

Tiny SliTaz (tiny.slitaz.org/) will run from 4MB RAM.

...

There are a bunch of hundred pieces of useful (and even current) Linux software that would run in 8MB RAM total.

Not saying it's what you want, but you can certainly still do a bunch of things with an embedded hardware - tier Linux box.


With 300MB RAM total you can already run the vast majority of native applications on Linux just fine. I don't think you can say the same for Windows 7

Windows 10 LTSB

As I posted W10 is working just fine but you can keep bitching I guess

tiny core

What the fuck is he goiing to do with that?