Only 36 Percent of Indian Software Engineers Can Write Useful Code

>A new report states that only 36 percent of Indian software engineers can write working, compilable code based on a test used to automatically grade programming skills.

breitbart.com/tech/2017/05/10/report-only-36-of-indian-coders-can-write-compilable-code/

Other urls found in this thread:

aspiringminds.com/sites/default/files/National Programming Skills Report - Engineers 2017 - Report Brief.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I am sure you will get similar results if you did the same test in the US. A lot of people are just shit programmers in general

>breitbart

Can we do the same sort of research on women programmers

An IDE is not a place for pooing!

They didn't conduct the study, they're just reporting the facts.

You can read the study here.
aspiringminds.com/sites/default/files/National Programming Skills Report - Engineers 2017 - Report Brief.pdf

Really makes you think

think about killing yourself back to Sup Forums dumb memespamming retard

There's no need for the unpleasantness when I present pertinently intriguing information that can scroggle your noggin.

are you this triggered because it only listed two genders?

They should've listed the whole spectrum, that would give a nice diagram and a curve calculated with MVR.

Females (males) are the best programmers.

no. "spectrum" implies one dimension.
im feeling im moved in SECOND GENDER DIMENSION and you are fasist.

for real, goddamn

Why did the BSOD become useless? BSOD 20 years ago was fucking useful, now it isn't.
Nice progress Microshit.

Still better than americans, apparently.

You use a kernel debugger like windbg to analyze the kernel memory dump.

>windbg
Is that useful without source code?

You have to download windows symbol table first.

this

even better is having a gf(+penis) programmer gf

These numbers are fucking terrible for both.
I want to say some bullshittery is at play here.

some of the people using nt4 would've been able to troubleshoot their own shit

but a normie sees a verbose bsod and thinks it's asking him to delete virus files

Will check it out, danke

>breitbart
into the trash it goes. These are the same people who push conspiracy theories (which have no evidence) and white supremacy

That was the whole point, told me the address and dumped the base addresses of the drivers. Easy to figure which driver and then which piece of hardware to deal with too.
Frowny faces aren't useful and neither are QR codes that are too small to scan or not onscreen long enough either. I mean wtf where they thinking?

It's a study m8. See

If you're an advanced enough user that the information presented in the old NT bluescreens would be useful to you, then you are smart enough to manually read the contents of the memory dump. The data is still all there. The new screens just mean that it's simpler for casual users, it doesn't take any information away from you.

but it means I need a working OS too in order to use the tools to read the dump.
Before, it gave me the information and I could deal with it possibly bringing the OS into a useable state to repair.
Microsoft put the cart before the horse.

Microsoft execs should be forced to fix users computers until they get that having useful tools is actually beneficial or at least the option in the almighty GUI so advanced users can select useful while those that don't wish it do not.
While I'm bitching, I also want a linux style boot dump dammit.

>open news
>BA was grounded today
>they offshored IT to Tata

The 36% figure is actually incorrect. 36% of indian engineers can produce code that COMPILES.

The report actually showed that approximately 4% of indian programmers could produce functionally correct code.

4% can produce code that does what you asked them to do.

leave it to breitbart to be too generous to the pajeets

t. mad panjeet.

In all fairness, the test might have been hard and there was only a 60 minute time limit. Still, not being able to get even code that compiles is pretty pathetic.

meanwhile 100% of American and European engineers write useful code but CEOs are greedy capitalists and still hiring H-1B because are CHEAP.

Yet """progressives""" like Bernie Sanders will never point out the hiring of pajeets as another example of corporate greed.

>Briberat

how are they defining useful code
no i didnt read the article nor am i going. it's up to op to make less faggotty threads

See

the test parameters aren't specified, but the 36% figure are those who produced code that doesn't throw a compile time error, not those who produced functionally correct code.

At least you can enable the old, detailed BSoD if you want.
There's a registry key for that.

You're shitting me! Google here I come.

>the test parameters aren't specified
gee what a functionally worthless article.
i mean not that I doubt pajeets are churning out shit, but fuck, some scientific literacy would be nice.

I definitely ain't
I feared that it was completely gone as well, but then I thought that MS couldn't have gone full retard regarding this aspect of their OS.

Wow, that's higher than the percentage of white people. No wonder Indians are so prevalent in tech.

lol you wish panjeet

>t. A mad whitey cuck who couldn't get past data structures

Hey, your wife here wants me to tell you to take out the garbage and to do your laundry tomorrow for that Walmart interview you have.

I am not a leftist, but Breitbart definitely manipulates and skews statistics to push out clickbait articles for their readers.
Get a better source OP.

They're literally just reporting what the study says. Read the thread.

>panjeet bants
ayy

but in all seriousness what's it like being universally despised by all other races?

I wouldn't know, I'm not white.

Not them, but I have no idea who "Aspiring Minds" are, and what I've seen so far doesn't exactly inspire confidence. The report is full of buzzwords (many of which aren't even used correctly) and grammatical errors. And they don't go into their research methodology really at all, all they imply is that the people being tested are college-educated, it doesn't specify whether they are undergrads or graduates that have been in the workforce for several years, or what specific program of courses they've taken, etc. They've got numbers, sure, but I can't figure out what they actually mean, and I doubt they can, either. I'd honestly be embarassed to turn in something so sloppy as a undergraduate term paper.

It's an Indian company. Of course it's going to be unprofessional and sloppy.

They specify literally nothing about the qualifications of the engineers or the difficulty of the tasks, never mind whether the test remotely resembles the actual process of software development.

The study is trash though. Real news wouldn't consider it a credible source.

Actually, they just report the truth and don't sugar-coat things to not hurt curryniggers' fee-fees.

Wrong. That's what they CLAIM to do, but a lot of the "truth" they report is incredibly questionable. Of course, if you actually DO question their "truths", that makes you a dirty commie that hates America.

They're biased as fuck and twist the facts, perhaps as much as CNN

t. Sup Forumsack national socialist

I work for one of the largest IT companies in Denmark and boy do they employ a lot of indians.
Issue is that it's marginally few of them that stick around for more than a year, which is the bare minimum to acquire enough domain knowledge to be productive.
Second being their caste system still being very much in effect; if they're in direct contact with higher-ups, all traces of proactivity goes out the window, they don't doubt their boss' choices: his word is law.
Third being the amount of specification required, what you save in developer costs, you spend in hours required by Technical Architects to specify.
Fourth: they think they're on vacation when they're on-site.

>methodology

I'm Pajeet and I can confidently say this report was made by an Indian. Our education system is full of regurgitated buzzword throwing.

>checks company
Yup

Maybe done on a piece of paper? Too lazy to read study to figure out methodology.

I read it, there's literally no detail other than that each person solved two questions and was then graded by "advanced artifiicial intelligence software"