Google will block its own ads:
>Sridhar Ramaswamy, the executive in charge of Google’s ads, writes in a blog post that even ads “owned or served by Google” will be blocked on pages that don’t meet Chrome’s guidelines.
What other company do you know with this kind of integrity?
Thank you again, based Google
AD BLOCKER BY GOOGLE -
will block ads even by Google ! source: theverge.com
literally who cares?
everyone interested in blocking ads has already blocking google's ads for years
Thank you, based Google.
It's Embrace, extend, and exterminate.
You forgot to thank based Google.
So google is soduku itself?
/thread
You mean seppuku? jesus fuck you're ignorant... and on a japanese anime forum
Lol, botnet is crumbling, Better Ads Coalition my ass. Even grandmas running ublock now, yet they are trying to act to be in a position to negotiate.
Short alphabet, this ride will get ugly
I meant sudoku, sorry.
content blocking is growing 30% per year
>not knowing seppuku is spelled sudoku on Sup Forums
Nufag
idgaf
This, they'll go the AdBlock Plus way.
Dont worry they WILL find a way to monetise you and ad firms
In fact they already know how they are going to do it because is a top (((company))) and dont do half assed decisions
An in browser subscription to get rid of all ads would be a neat idea. Pay once per month to have a fully ad free web experience. The company behind the subscription then pays out each website you do visit.
thats Brave
and build in ad costs to the internet connections, like they did with piracy and data storage. And people think wannacry is ransomware baka flimflamalam
non sequitur
To be fair, how many companies do they have ads with? Didn't dozens drop out after the YouTube controversy.
>early 2018
A little late.
>The company told CNBC that it will allow publishers to participate in a new program called Funding Choices.
>Under the program, when a user with a third-party ad blocker enabled visits a participating site using Chrome,
>they will see a prompt that asks them to either turn off their ad blocker, or "pay for a pass that removes all ads on that site through the new Google Contributor.
>"If they choose to pay the fee, Google will take a 10 percent cut.
>If they select neither choice, they won't be able to view the website.
cnbc.com
This is how the age of free wild west web dies.
Strangled by googles tentacles, fueled by jewgold.
That's just until they fully develop the ad blocking feature on chrome after a while they'll integrate it with the rest of the google services.
That's just a marketing ploy, ofcourse they'll block ads from google at first if they base it on other adblockers which is the smartest thing to do, THEY CAN'T BUILD ALL THE FEATURES AT ONCE ANYWAY.
Youtube wasn't integrated with google at first and look at it now.
Even IE11 supports the easylist and you moron want to pay.
Some of cretins are really asking for it.
No they wont.
>Google will also work with advertisers to help them “improve ads for consumers” and stop them from “blocking all ads, [which] takes a big toll on the content creators, journalists, web developers and videographers who depend on ads to fund their content creation.”
>Google is also working with advertisers on a “customized message to visitors using an ad blocker, inviting them to either enable ads on their site, or pay for a pass that removes all ads on that site through the new Google Contributor.”
>they're working with advertisers
I see so if they AREN'T WORKING with them that means that they will get blocked.
So only google ads will be shown or ads that "work" with google meaning they need to pay google.
It's good for them since they have 50% or more browser market share.
Now BOW to your botnet master.
on the contrary, these are the cracks on the almighty no-one-should-compete-with Google
Still a botnet
But now even people who aren't interested in blocking ads will get ads blocked for free just by using Chrome.
It's win/win because more shitty ad networks will suffer without people having to actively choose to block ads.
The problem is when jewgle starts to implode it's going to take a lot of the infrastructure with it.
>Instead of an ad “blocker,” Google is referring to the feature as an ad “filter,” according to The Wall Street Journal, since it will still allow ads to be displayed on pages that meet the right requirements. The blocker will work on both desktop and mobile.
So basically they're going to block everything except for google adsense.
you know there are people who don't use their services
T.Y.B.G.