Do you think qualcomm have a chance at taking marketshare from intel?

Do you think qualcomm have a chance at taking marketshare from intel?

Other urls found in this thread:

venturebeat.com/2017/05/11/watch-windows-10-running-on-arm-with-full-support-for-existing-win32-apps/
datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2017/03/13/arm-servers-can-soon-power-half-of-microsoft-data-center-muscle/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Can Snapdragon performance match that of Intel?

Not one bit. Windows 10S is a guaranteed flop because the Windows Store is deserted, and there are no Android alternatives to the iPad Pro and Surface Pro.

I think they do. But the funny thing is that even if they don't, they can out-produce x86 with zillions of cheap ARM devices and suffocate them slowly anyway.

Does performance matter as much as battery life in mobile devices? Especially for normies? Nope. Why do you think x86 failed so hard in mobile space in the first place? Despite Intel literally dumping their crappy Atoms on the market.

Intel cannot match amd
Qualcomm is litterally amd rejects.

I'm pretty sure these devices aren't running Windows 10 S. The W10S boogieman is only showing up in devices aimed at educational sectors. It's a ChromeOS competitor.

If they actually made desktop class processors at a good price point maybe.

>Implying the rapidly shrinking desktop market even matters much anymore
>Implying ARM can't eat Intel's lunch in the laptop and server markets

Performance is only one factor in CPUs. It turns out efficiency and scaleability are pretty important as well. When you have a CPU that's only good at low core count high clockspeed performance computing, it shouldn't surprise you when it gets beaten in other areas.

No not yet, but they are plenty powerful enough for media playback, and shitposting.

>literally half the ipc as sandy bridge
>have abhorrent performance per watt
lolno

Even worse AMD is getting ready to rape intel with raven ridge APUs. I don't think qualcum ever stood a chance.

Zen-based APUs got you covered. No, Qualcomm stands no fucking chance agains Zen.

i briefly glanced at this image and thought it was a psycho arrangement of weird monitors on a desk

>literally half the ipc as sandy bridge
>have abhorrent performance per watt
Source on this? Because it doesn't line up with my experiences with ARM/Intel x86 in mobile devices at all.
There's what looks like an all-in-one or mini PC in there.

Because Intel's mobile low power shit are Atoms, not their mainline Core CPUs. Atoms are shit.

What would've been a better idea for Intel to go for, then? Underclocked Celerons? lol

what the fuck are those shoes

come on dude did you really think they go with your suit???

Develop a new fucking arch already. They are getting shat on by Zen.

Just Wait(tm) until 2020. Probably 2021 with the way things are going.

Can they compete with Qualcomm's pricing? $27 for an 835 is hard to beat.

No, but they offer more performance than ARM turd. And software. ARM has no software.
Thank you for your input, Mr. Krzanich. What about 10nm?

dumbass

>What about 10nm?
We've got people trying to change the laws of physics to allow it, but they won't budge.

Considering that Intel with years ahead of competition from amd got trainwrecked by it... Qualcomm can... But let's remember that Qualcomm chips are already behind samsung on the mobile when it comes down to performance...

Is not a hard task 99% of laptops users just have an os to boot office + web browsers + local files...

But Mr. Krzanich, AMD showed working chips fabbed on 5nm GAAFET node yesterday.

>ARM has no software.
Not only is this blatantly untrue, but Windows 10 on ARM has a very nice compat layer that lets you run Win32 apps no problem. venturebeat.com/2017/05/11/watch-windows-10-running-on-arm-with-full-support-for-existing-win32-apps/

>slow
>as all shits
Itanium and Transmeta say hello. Emulating x86 is a good idea, pal.

Nobody gives a fuck about performance, that's why Intel is still selling the same speed CPUs as they did back in 2011, and Android being the most popular phone OS.
People only care about cheap.

These CPUs from 2011 are still much faster than anything ARM.

You should read into Windows 10 on ARM, it's nothing like what Transmeta or Itanium is.

And current ARM is still much faster than what most people give a fuck about.

Yes, it's shit with no software with shitty emulation layer. Again, Transmeta says hello. They did the same shit Qualcomm tries to do now and ultimately failed.

THOSE FILTHY NAZIS COULDN'T GET DOWN TO 5NM IF THEIR LIVES DEPENDED ON IT

Like I said, you should read into Windows 10 on ARM, it's nothing like what Transmeta or Itanium is.

Its going to be offered to OEMs for $0. That shit is going to be on basically every system.

Microsoft's plan seems to be a return to a segmented market.
Windows 10 S for the mainstream OEM hardware market, for the few people that care $50 to Microsoft to actually use your computer
the new Windows NT Workstation for serious business at a big price premium for the people who need it.

Then why most people are not using fucking chromebooks?
But Mr. Krzanich, they did, and they even used GAAFETS.

>Then why most people are not using fucking chromebooks?
Because it's not Windows.

Again, it's really worrying that people don't actually want a 3rd competitor for CPUs. I smell AMD and Intel shilling in here.

>Then why most people are not using fucking chromebooks?
The ARM CPUs in Chromebooks are bottom of the barrel trash tier Rockchip garbage.

It's exactly what Transmeta was. Anyway, the market today is different and maybe, just maybe ARM will substitute cheapest ULV garbage from Intel.

>for the few people that care $50 to Microsoft to actually use your computer
At least that's an option unlike Chromebooks where your only choice is to hope you can blast the Google shit off of it and boot without having an annoying error message in your face every time. CHroot is just a band-aid workaround.

**IBM with Global Foundries made 5nm, which AMD could license for Zen 3 possibly.

They are not licensing it. They have fab agreement with GloFo for the next, what, 5 years? Also Samsung is part of IBMs cartel.

>agreements can't be extended
>IBM never licenses their tech

The Zen must flow

No, I meant, they can fab future chips on whatever process GloFo can fab them. That includes 7nm HP (GOD THE CLOCKS) and future 5nm GAAFETs.

Also what about meme ARM servers? Where are they?

Nice deflection. Remember when the party line was "Microsoft would never do that, they love the open platform ecosystem"

Also, isn't essentially a CHroot basically Microsoft's solution to the problem of needing a modern powerful command line UNIX environment on an outdated VMS clone?

Right where they should be. Absolutely dirt cheap, and firmly in the GNU/Linux camp.

I should specify: big dick ARM servers.

datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2017/03/13/arm-servers-can-soon-power-half-of-microsoft-data-center-muscle/

Bullshit? Not bullshit?

>It's exactly what Transmeta was.
It's not, read up on Windows 10 on ARM.

Bullshit since Microdicks are going for EPYC.

>$27
Where did you get this figure from?

Does it matter when most people use their laptop as a faceboom machine and the majority of the performance goes unused?