Theresa May to launch wide-ranging internet regulation and security changes

independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/theresa-may-election-latest-internet-regulation-downing-street-speech-manifesto-a7783186.html

>In the speech in which she committed to keep governing despite calls to stand down, the prime minister made reference to extending powers for the security services. Those powers – which include regulation of the internet and forcing internet companies to let spies read everyone's private communications – were a key part of the Conservative campaign, which failed to score a majority in the House of Commons.

>One of those will be "cracking down on the ideology of Islamist extremism and all those who support it," she said in the short speech. And she will also "give the police and the authorities the powers they need to keep our country safe".

>During the election campaign, the prime minister refused to rule out Chinese-style internet censorship as part of that regulation plan, suggesting that she might look to shut down or ban companies that didn't comply with her controversial proposals.

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/16/man-arrested-facebook-posts-syrian-refugees-scotland
breitbart.com/london/2014/04/28/uk-cops-arrest-man-for-quoting-churchill/
twitter.com/JustinTrudeau/status/873600926128504832
twitter.com/JustinTrudeau/status/873601054226698242
wired.co.uk/article/jeremy-corbyn-digital-democracy-manifesto
github.com/alphagov
newstatesman.com/politics/2013/02/ukip-party-bigots-lets-look-evidence
telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage/11467713/No-dogs.-No-blacks.-No-Irish-is-now-Ukip-policy.html
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/ukip-general-election-paddy-singh-north-wiltshire-candidate-suspended-racist-tweets-holocaust-a7746041.html
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-40211531
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Reminder that Labour had no such plans.

...

check the catalog you dumb faggot

If you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to worry about. If you're not a kiddy-fiddler like Podesta, a muslim terrorist like Bin Laden or a traitor that sells state secrets like Snowden, you literally don't ever need privacy. Privacy is just a convenience excuse used by criminals and enemies of the state.

Credit card details.
Identity theft.
"Wrong think"

>Credit card details
It's up to the banks to enforce how secure their payment systems are.

>Identity theft
Internet regulation actually reduces identity theft.

>"Wrong think"
Wrong think is the gateway to terrorism. If you aren't morally upstand but keep a fake facade it's actually worse.

>It's up to the banks to enforce how secure their payment systems are.
Hence encryption, HTTPS, SSL certs etc etc

Exactly. Encryption should remain in the hands of corporations that are certified by the government to use such dangerous double-edge swords. It's no business for individuals.

Why would I listen to a braindead socialist and a chickenhawk warmongerer?

fuck off wanker

That's the spirit. Now, hand over your private keys.

>Wrong think is the gateway to terrorism. If you aren't morally upstand but keep a fake facade it's actually worse.
And uh... who exactly judges the classification for an upstanding citizen then? What's the criteria?

Because when the option is between fascism and socialism you should probably choose the socialist.

>Wrong think is the gateway to terrorism. If you aren't morally upstand but keep a fake facade it's actually worse.
Seems to have turned out well in Sweden.
Oh wait.

You can't ban mathematics.

Even China, Russia, Saudi don't ban encryption.

Is the year 1984?

Of course you can ban mathematics. Anyone who is caught doing them is sent to prison. What part of this do you not understand?

Depends on the type of fascism.

HE'S GOT A CALCULATOR, SEIZE HIM

First you create the problem and then offer the solution.

Let the jihadists back into the country from Libya full knowing they would do something like this.

Glad to see it blew on her face, just not enough.

I still can't understand how you dipshits from Madenhead didn't vote Lord Buckethead. Anything May does now is your own god damn fault!

Conservashit voters will ruin this country

t. UKIP voter

>Everybody is safe
>A handful of inter-business communications are safe
Hmm, I wonder which one is superior.

why him of course, since he's such an upstanding citizen fighting for our rights and liberties :^)

Everybody is safe if and only if the government has access to all communications in the nation.

That is far more dangerous than the occasional terrorist attack killing a handful of people (which it won't even stop, they will simply stop using it).

it's down to those 5 scottish constitutencies who went tory after at least 2 decades of being snp/lib dem/labour that even gave the tories a chance of forming a coalition in the first place, this was scottish sentiment 20 years ago for some context: www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1uSSRcn7UE

I hate the EU but holy shit it's impossible to symphatize for the UK either.

>Let the jihadists back into the country from Libya full knowing they would do something like this.
It's not really that simple to restrict people from entering the country, especially if they're UK nationals.

>Sup Forumscucks will defend this

When a candidate is smeared across left, right, center and endorsed by David Icke, you know they are a genuine threat to the establishment.

that is true, but it's also a slippery slope

It might not be simple, but it is far easier than trying to totally prevent the use of any and all obfuscated communication and then having to go after talking in coffee shops because if encrypted messaging becomes impossible they will simply go back to doing it the old way.

it's not even true unless you consider thought police to be acting in your interest

That was an understatement; what I should have said is that it's basically impossible to restrict citizens from returning to their home country. You can have increased scrutiny on these guys, which I believe they did and still do, but essentially what you're talking about is a ban on travel to Middle East/North African countries, which is problematic for a number of reasons

Again, more problematic than trying to outlaw hundreds of pieces of software on millions of devices, restricting access to those pieces of software without destroying software development in the UK and wrestling half of corporate America into submission? I'm dubious.

You don't need encryption, what are you trying to hide? Anyone against this is basically a cuck because they hate order.

Hand over your chat logs then. I'll be waiting for the pastebin link.

Someone already tried that one.

You haven't answered why you need it

>privacy is bad

...Also hold on, how is opposing order being cucked? Is supplicating to other people not pretty much the definition of being cucked?

but I did.

All your chat logs, now.

It gives terrorists protection so yes. Hitler saw privacy as a jew idea and the third reich was free of degeneracy.

>Listening to the ideas of an obvious Jewish plant
Who do you think wants all your data unencrypted, goyim?

>It gives terrorists protection so yes.

ira were bombing northern ireland and england long before encryption was a thing you dumb shit

Hitler wasn't a jew plant, goldberg

They do it all the time in "random" searches at airports, it's not uncommon to get taken aside in Heathrow if your beard is a certain length and you're brown enough
Yet they conveniently neglect to search the guy who's already been reported numerous times returning from a vrazy place like Libya

...

>Hitler
Literally the reason why the Jews are currently so powerful.

More jew lies, you're obviously not white.

>The man who gave the Jews all their power in the modern world was in no way part of the plan
Really makes you think.

eat shit

Yet another jew lie, hitler was based and got rid of all known marxists and other degenerates.

UK status changed from KEKED to KEKED TWICE.
And you know what?
UK cunts enjoy this.

Clearly he didn't since marxists and jews run the world now.

Doesn't prove anything that hitler was a jew plant.

Fuck off SJW

Good goy. Encryption is for terrorists.

Ron Paul is a race traitor jew lover, nobody here ever liked him.

What if I happen to think we need less immigration to our tiny island, because this causes a strain on public resources?

theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/16/man-arrested-facebook-posts-syrian-refugees-scotland

Or what if I want to quote a former prime minister?

breitbart.com/london/2014/04/28/uk-cops-arrest-man-for-quoting-churchill/

I have multiple bank details encrypted on my hard drive. I need access to them to pay my bills, but I also need them secure so nobody can take my money.

I bet you don't use https Sup Forums then.

>Trusting an idiot to completely liquidate your economy's wealth on social programs
I'd rather just leave that country at that point

No.
>Implying socialists don't have a history of violating people's privacy

when it comes to privacy they are one and the same

Honestly can't wait for all those white dudes to be locked up because they criticized religion.

Ron Paul is irrelevant to this conversation. We're discussing English politics.

Here's hoping some of the DUP guys slap down Mays attempts at putting through this internet stuff.

>What if I happen to think we need less immigration

couldn't find said facebook posts but given other highly publicised cases of people being arrested for what they've said on twitter I wouldn't be surprised if the facebook posts were vitriolic

>Or what if I want to quote a former prime minister?

not what he was arrested for, but I do think it's slightly ironic that one of the bills he was arrested for violating was introduced by the conservatives

neither of these situations relate to encryption, they both relate to things people have publicly posted or said

either way, I do think both of these cases should be protected under constitutionally protected free speech and privacy, it's just too bad the uk offers neither of these things and the tories are too interested in eroding our human rights

>desperate naivete

I know this is bait, but for the sake of others who genuinely think along these lines:

In all the major cases of Muslim terrorism (Westminster, Manchester, London Bridge), rape gangs (Rotherham, Oxford, Telford and many more), etc the culprits have already been known to the authorities and yet they were still allowed to commit their atrocities.

Yet when it comes to "extremists" on the right (nationalists, anti-islam figures, etc) they seem to get swept up pretty efficiently.

May banned Richard Spencer from entering the UK for fear he will give a pro-white speech, whilst openly anti-white, anti-british, hate protests not only get allowed, but in many cases actually protected by police.

The case is the same for most terrorists across Europe, so lack of information is clearly not the issue here.

More information will just mean more being used against the nationalists who actually want to protect this country. There's absolutely no reason to believe Muslims won't get turned a blind eye to as always.

Thank you for your patriotism. Let me see your private keys. You're not some kind of terrorist, are you?

I'm a good citizen so I don't use keys of any kind. Keys have pointy edges which could be dangerous.

They didn't stop Jo Cox's killer.

>Richer Spencer being "pro white"

since when is being a nazi pro white?

Since 1920.

Neither did UKIP
You lads failed big nige

>Americunt
>moved to England two weeks ago
>HDD on shitbox T60 is encrypted
How fucked am I?

not as fucked as you'll be when you have to take that back through us customs

Fair point. Because of that one white guy (who was denied medical treatment the day before) killed an MP we should remember that we are all just as prone to violence as the Muslims who committed almost every other major UK atrocity this century.

I did my bit for our Nige and voted UKIP. I hope Nige comes back as leader now Nuttall's resigned.

He's not a Nazi. Nazis would never say speak so kindly of homosexuality as he does.

Good lad, you did the right thing

>fascism isn't socialism
>national socialist party is right wing
>socialism is about small government and less regulation
>aligning yourself with either party means you're the very extreme of it and agree 100% with all of their policies
very funny desu

Meanwhile in Canada

twitter.com/JustinTrudeau/status/873600926128504832

twitter.com/JustinTrudeau/status/873601054226698242

>Elsewhere in the manifesto, Corbyn said "publicly funded software and hardware" should be open source – making it possible for anyone to recreate and use the creations.
Jezza confirmed /ourguy/

wired.co.uk/article/jeremy-corbyn-digital-democracy-manifesto

>those teeth
jesus christ, if you're going white supremacy at least go with someone that actually sets the standards

>suggesting that she might look to shut down or ban companies that didn't comply with her controversial proposals
You can't shut them down when literally every major website that matters operates out of the US.

>UKIP
>white supremacy
lmao

they shit on polaks because they are white while not daring say anything negative about darkies.

no son
the SS did all the work and blamed hitler for it
their plan was to unite europe with germany at the helm controlling all of the economy, and break up the ussr and yugoslavia... which all happened
ww2 wasn't about ideology, it was about securing money and power
more than half of the surviving documents about world wide spy games, true agendas of various factions of various nations, and etc have yet to be declassified
what we know for sure is that hitler was part jew and part of (((their))) master plan to seize control over the world's financial systems

then whats the point you cuck

kys dumb cunt

>meanwhile if you insult trannys you go to jail

lmao at you smelly nu male leafcuck.
Tech wont matter when people are raping your mum

>In all the major cases of Muslim [...] rape gangs (Rotherham, Oxford, Telford and many more), etc the culprits have already been known to the authorities and yet they were still allowed to commit their atrocities.

wow, it's almost as if you took some of the publicised cases of mudslime rape gangs and ignored all the britfag rape gangs that had people covering up for them, the most recent case being jimmy savile - never mind the countless times the catholic church covered up the abuses of their priests and impeded police investigations by moving priests from church to church

even the founder of the democratic unionist party, ian paisley, was involved in a cover up through not reporting information to the police that one of his close allies was fiddling kids - yes, the same democratic unionist party that is now forming a coalition with the tory cunts

hell while we're on the topic, both a british and an american agent working for mi5 knew in advanced that a car bomb was heading to omagh, and if that isn't enough, gchq were listening live to the mobile calls as it was happening - neither agency informed omagh police of the matter

or how about those secret letters northern irish police gave to ira agents on the run from english police that granted them immunity - which in one case led to the collapse of a trial for a car bomber, at least the DUP were against this one - but they were the wrong type of nationalists as far as the DUP is concerned

if you want to hate muslims go ahead, but don't coat it in a thin veneer of 'but when it's nationalists or white people doing it the police crack down on it immediately'

Why not just strengthen Immigration Laws?

canada isn't immune from it, c-51 ran amok for well over a year and it's looking doubtful as to whether csis will even be penalised for it

this might be in relation to things like gov.uk which are open source under permissive licences - about the only good thing our government has done of late

github.com/alphagov

just like government funded research, if government funded development of software or hardware isn't open source/open hardware what's the point in funding it through the taxpayer?

>they shit on polaks because they are white

poles aren't ethnically white as far as white nationalists are concerned, same for irish, jews, italians, eastern europeans et al

>while not daring say anything negative about darkies

I shared similar views pre-2010 when the BNP were still a thing and had the bulk of the racist lunatics, however you have to have been living under the rock to have avoided the public racism a good deal of ukip members have shared

newstatesman.com/politics/2013/02/ukip-party-bigots-lets-look-evidence
telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage/11467713/No-dogs.-No-blacks.-No-Irish-is-now-Ukip-policy.html
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/ukip-general-election-paddy-singh-north-wiltshire-candidate-suspended-racist-tweets-holocaust-a7746041.html
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-40211531

not even close to what the law is about nor how it is going to be interpreted in the courts but carry on you disinformation spreading shill

>UK thinks they're just going to be able to shutdown it censor non complying companies services
>many of these services being American made and based in the US
>like Google and FB

Enjoy your shitty hugbox abortion subnet you yellow teeth cucks.

Because that would be intolerant, racist, xenophobic, and triggering user. While we can agree to disagree, the new Internet censorships prohibit criticizing immigration laws, Muslims, and Islam. The authorities are on their way to your home as I type this.

Hopefully you can be rehabilitated to the right way of thinking

And then they say shit/pol/sting wont fry your brain. Clearly this stormwiene is way beyond crispiness.

who cares, they are out of the EU, not gonna affect the rest of the EU.
funny that if they were in the EU, such regulations would not have been allowed by the EU.