When i3s are beating AMD flagships I think it may be time to stop

When i3s are beating AMD flagships I think it may be time to stop.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=MjnOYv3hsDo
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

when you shitpost is just a turd

>desperately clinging onto single thread metrics

> 2017
> Single thread performance

Maybe you guys can form a cry-in get together.

remember to sage and hide!

>Pissmark

so you like pissmark now?

>7350k beating 7900X
>INTLEL BTFO HOW WILL THEY EVER
Those two don't really match, do they?

>When i3s are beating i9 flagships I think it may be time to stop.

>Processors that cost well over $1000 dollars beating $400-500 processors

really activates my almonds

Not OP, but care to suggest an alternative?
No?
So shut up.

7700k Delid™ edition :^)

...

I like how it's from the very same website OP used to shitpost.

Fuck.
I responded to the wrong post, I meant that for:

>2017
>99% of consumer cpu requirement is gaming
>games all dependent on single core performance

>b-b-b-buh muh niche use case!!! muh waiting 30 seconds longer for video encoding!!! muh task manager doesnt have enough boxes!!!

For fucks sakes 95% of consumers (THE PRIMARY MARKET FOR THESE CHIPS) could get by on shitty ARM chips. Normies are using fucking phones now. You don't need a 16 core $400 CPU to browse facebook/Sup Forums/reddit. If you are a gamer you need single core performance until DX12/Vulkan are non shit. Which will happen in 5 years, but that's not 2017 is it you fucking retard?

If you are a power user who needs a workstation for niche use cases you buy a SERVER chip with a shit ton of cores, possibly multi socket, not a CONSUMER chip. And it won't matter how much it costs because that PC is MAKING YOU A SHIT TON OF MONEY and seconds actually matter because the business owning the computer is paying the professionals needing that PC hundreds if not thousands of dollars an hour.

All the shit in between is literally marketing. You are literally consuming a pile of shit if you are a regular desktop user and if you follow the "community" you are checking out reviews of shit.

If you think you need a $700 processor so you can draw art, just go buy an iPad you dumb fuck.

games make use of multiple cores, it isn't 2006 anymore

>Being this level of an Intel shill on full damage control.

:^)

how about use single core CPU for a week by yourself?
>youtube.com/watch?v=MjnOYv3hsDo

>hurr durr my use case is the only use case ever
>hurr durr other use cases don't exist if i don't want them to

Your use case is not relevant because there just that many people out there adding subtitles to hentai.

Instead you buy shit with disabled cores and neutered overclocks because

>finally AMD is looking out for the amateur anime watcher!
>with Intel I can film myself shoving objects up my ass and they render 30 seconds quicker

>i am totally a tech expert not some consumerist retard who will eat literal shit if it makes me feel good

Wow, he's foaming.

OP is right.
However there's a flaw in her reasoning.
Going intel means i7 7700k as all the other options be it i3s or i5s ALSO have problems as they suffer in the minimum FPS department.

That means AYMDshills are ALSO right to a degree.

Now, intel could absolutely CRUSH Amd with its moarcoar gimmick® if they just gave up on insane margins abit and put a:
>4c/8t
>K
>200$

CPU on the market.

Best of both worlds.
Maybe CoffeeLake will address that?

As of now, Ryzen makes the most sense.
+15% high fps < -300% minimum fps sorry OP

They can't. They have to keep up margins or their shareholders will kill them. They've said they are willing to sacrifice marketshare to retain their margins.

Why does it look like an onahole.

Because everyone in x86 is busy getting fucked.

HOL'UP

This can't be correct.
You're telling me we've gone back to Q2 2007 levels of Marketshare overnight?

If you look at pic related, AMD is doing BETTER than pre-Sandy last time it had slightly superior products with Athlon II and Phenom IIs.

No chance in hell this is right.

It's lower, but historically it's pretty spot on of marketshare growth.

>single core performance
this isn't 2009 anymore

ah yes, very affordable

Hey it worked for me

>I use only one program at a time

>Reasonable
>Low expectations
Yeah if you are a poorfag