What evidence is there of Russia hacking the DNC?
However, we do in fact have evidence of the NSA using tools to make it seem like a hack originated from a certain country.
What evidence is there of Russia hacking the DNC?
Bentley Moore
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Grayson King
Go back to NeoGAF or something. Anyone who knows anything about hacking knows all this "Russian hacking" shit is a total an utter meme.
Not technology, because there is no technological basis for "Russian hacks".
Lincoln King
3
Cooper Bell
Russia will probably provide evidence of to ask them. Just to confuse people even more. God I love modern politics.
Austin Hill
A big nothing Burger
Gabriel Ortiz
Didn't Russia release that shitty notPytra ransomware into Ukraine the day before their national holiday to help fuck over their economy?
Evan Cox
it's a nothing burger?
Samuel Perez
Fancy Bear pls go
Elijah Jackson
...
Kevin Thompson
>tfw you can't even trust wikipedia anymore
Josiah Thompson
...
Carson Morgan
talking about the US election. Every random DDOS and malware spread isn't "hacking the election".
Dominic Martinez
>linking to wikipedia over political matters
I seriously hope you don't get your worldview of ongoing political issues from Wikipedia. You're literally cucking yourself to a handful of editors who are willing to filibuster articles more than anyone else.
Ayden Lopez
Yeah, because the 300+ sources and the thousands of people who edited the article must be wrong!
Go back to jacking off to drawn chinese-style characters and leave intelligence analysis to the career professionals
Adam Butler
>However, we do in fact have evidence of the NSA using tools against ourselves
yup
gg trump
Julian Martinez
>Huffington Post opinion-pieces is reliable sources even when written by people with obvious conflicts of interest
>anything that disagrees with me isn't a reliable source
That's pretty much how citations work on Wikipedia. They're whitelisted and blacklisted based on domain of hosting, no other context is considered.
Brayden Ortiz
>wikipedia
>career professionals
do you understand how easy it is for a site like that to be politically biased?
I'm not saying that there's no way such a thing ever happened, but that, as of now, there's still really nothing substantial to it, certainly not to earn it an article of that tone and length.
also:
>not watching anime
Adam Green
Nice vase
Where2cop?
Daniel Cooper
There's not a single Huffpo opinion piece listed as a source in that article. The one Huffpo link is a news-style piece written by a legit journalist (e.g. with journalism degree and working experience with more traditional news organizations).
Keep crying though!
Hudson Carter
>career professionals
Which ones, the fellows of "Cyber Statecraft Initiative" at think-tanks whose sole reason for existence is to perpetuate the Cold War?
Brandon Myers
whoops forgot screenshot
Wikipedia has a well-known neoliberal bias.
>news-style
So, opinion masquerading as news.
ok Dmitri whatever you say
Sebastian Edwards
>Some people actually believe in the Russian hacker boogeyman
People really are cattle huh
Grayson Harris
>defending HuffPost
you couldn't even bother to talk about how reliable sourcing is abused on Wikipedia, you just went right after defending HuffPost (a more embarrassing, and undefendable example).
Ian Ortiz
>Keep crying though!
the absolute state of this man