Your country

>Your country
>Do you support this based man?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=IyqYY72PeRM
snopes.com/bernie-sanders-audi-8/
stormfront.org/forum/f222/?s=is_berniesanders_homosexual
youtube.com/watch?v=Ct1Moeaa-W8
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frédéric_Lordon
atterres.org/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I thought he died?

Yes

>Communist claiming to be liberal claiming capitalism is communist
youtube.com/watch?v=IyqYY72PeRM

>He doesn't want things to become free and to get paid a living wage

Bootlicking cuck detected

Yeah, he did a great job fucking things up for Hillary for a bit.

not really but I like his car

snopes.com/bernie-sanders-audi-8/

It's kinda sad he had to appeal to the regressive morons, would've chosen him over Trump if he had a chance to win.

I want to own a Lamborghini and live in Madrid. This is the fantasy the US government forced on these banks to make loans to people they knew would never be paid off. Bernie Sanders represents the culmination of every retarded liberal thought.

no, the fact that he was a more popular democratic candidate than Jim webb who was in the jungles of Vietnam when bernie was smoking pot in college and who was secretary of the navy when Bernie was fucking bum doing odd jobs says a lot about democrat voters.

I just hope to see him creating a third party.

But then I remember that I always hope retarded things.

stormfront.org/forum/f222/?s=is_berniesanders_homosexual

>linking to Stormfront
>ever

You should be hang for this

>He doesn't want everything to be free

nice try, capitalist bootlicker

He will be reincarnated as an independent.

Nice impersonation of a retarded liberal

Sanders doesn't want things to be free, he just wants a more active government and that poor people get a living wage.

Americans pay more than the rest of the world in both private and public expenses for healthcare, because without regulations companies can charge like 200$ what would cost 5€ here, and the government pays the bill when poor people can't.

Flag
Eh I knew he couldn't win, but I liked him the best of the options given. He just went way too hard on all the things he wanted, instead of taking smaller plausible steps to set the stage for them to come to fruition.
Now we're left with Trump or Hillary...

I like that he wants universal health care and tax-funded higher education, and America can afford these if it cut back on the bureaucracy a bit.

Wouldn't want to have his policies in my country though, we can't afford that shit. There's just not enough tax revenue and we're already running up the deficits.

>that poor people get a living wage

Do you not realize that will lead to unemployment?

Watch this video:(only 4 minutes)
youtube.com/watch?v=Ct1Moeaa-W8

Change your flag to Venezuela you preteen cunt.

I generally like Sanders, although it doesn't matter because the DNC will never endorse him. It's going to come down to Clinton and Trump. I've always voted democrat, but given the choice between the two I'll vote for Trump.

A man comes to you, says "These people are fucking you," (something you already know) and presents you with evidence. He also shows you how to stop being fucked, all you need to do is provide your signature.

But you won't. You will continue to support those people with money, sweat and blood. And that is why they fuck you.

Thank you for the capitalist propaganda, the 500th time it really manage to get its point across

If you can't afford to pay an employee a living wage then your business plan was unsound. Period. I suggest you start working with 9$/hour and try to live with it before using LearnLiberty, PragerUniversity and other shit like that.

As for the usual : "but people will get fired !"
I don't think an employer can afford to run a business with one less employee, or at least not with the same efficiency. The guy is shooting himself in the foot. Maybe he will get less in personal benefices - while a guy won't have to chose between eating and clothing. I see nothing wrong here.

Finally, any increase on the poor wage has a direct effect on economy, since they have barely their basic needs covered. With these new 5$/h, the worker will be able to buy new clothes, better food, books, repay his crippling debts (many Americans are indebted to unreasonable amounts), save for his son's studies... While giving more money to the rich will result in him placing them on a fiscal paradise, or spending them abroad and not in America.

I hear a lot of people saying "BUT WHY NOT MAKE THE LIVING WAGE 500$/hour!111un!". I find a bit hypocrite because one could answer "Then if low wage = more employment, let's pay them 1$/hour ! In company scrip ! Jobs for everyone ! What do you mean, it's slavery ?"

Yes, let's get rid of the minimum wage. People will be making a dollar an hour, but hey, everyone will have a job!

Strangely enough we have no minimum wage, but even the lowest paid people are paid much much better than in the USA.

It killed "jobs" such as bagging, because nobody wants to pay people that much for menial tasks.

>I suggest you start working with 9$/hour and try to live with it before using LearnLiberty, PragerUniversity and other shit like that.

That doesn't disprove what they're saying though.

The point is that raising the minimum wage is SUPPOSE to help minimum wage employees in theory, which I'm sure anyone will agree is a great thing. But the fact of the matter is it harms them the most.

>Tfw i made 12 out of high school by doing carpentry
>tfw i live in a right to work state
>tfw cost of living is cheap as fuck because i dont live in a liberal shit hole.

why are you alive?

>But the fact of the matter is it harms them the most.
So what, we should just keep it stagnant forever? The minimum wage is not even keeping up with inflation, which is not unreasonable to ask for, as it's not an extra burden on the company.

Look I'm not the boss here.

I'm just pointing out that most well-regarded economists do not believe that raising the minimum wage is a good way to help minimum wage workers/the poor.

>tfw I get to top-tier, with Muricans guest from MIT to be seen, Uni for 600€/year
>tfw I get my expensive as fuck medicine (by Yuropoor standard, 60€ a month) paid almost entirely by Healthcare
>tfw I went to psychotherapy free of charge
>tfw half of my rent is being paid off because I'm a student

Armchair economist. Workers on minimum "wage" are not living, they are surviving. You're enabling a modern form of slavery, nothing less.

>most well-regarded economists

Well there is a world outside of the US and its neoliberal propaganda.

Then what do you suggest to help them, Mr. Economist?

>Workers on minimum "wage" are not living, they are surviving. You're enabling a modern form of slavery, nothing less.

Yes I'm sure we all agree that it's not a good place to be. But the point is that economists do not believe it is an effective way to help them.

you're making it seem like facts and research by people with Phds is evil or that they hate poor people or something

>Then what do you suggest to help them, Mr. Economist?

I'm not exactly sure, I'm just pointing out that the most common suggestion of "just increase the minimum wage" doesn't seem to be effective.

Helping the poor and figuring out how to efficiently allocate resources in a society is a very difficult thing to do and that's why there's hundreds if not thousands of people employed to help create Social/Fiscal policy for a country and figure out the most effective way.

I present to you another alternative, then

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frédéric_Lordon
atterres.org/ (french)

Among many other things that denounce our toxic "ARBEIT ! WORK ! TRAVAIL !" culture. It is bad for the environment, bad for our health, bad for social equality.
The usual answer they give is that to reduce employment and increase happiness we should accept to actually work less with liveable wage for everyone. As I told you, a poor will spend everything of his wage on local economy, unlike a rich guy.

>Among many other things that denounce our toxic "ARBEIT ! WORK ! TRAVAIL !" culture. It is bad for the environment, bad for our health, bad for social equality.

Yeah that'd be great if poor people weren't such consumerists who always want more and right now

>As I told you, a poor will spend everything of his wage on local economy, unlike a rich guy.

What exactly do you think a "rich guy" does when he invests his money?

Why not remove minimum wage entirely to further emulate the Scandinavian countries that "democratic socialists" like Bernie loves so much?

I don't support but I insont hate him either, it is his supporters that are cringy as fuck and annoy the living hell out of me.

BERNIE "VOTE FOR HILLARY TO STOP THAT MEANIE TRUMP" SANDERS

And you morons still shill for this phony.

Even that honeypot piece of shit is more truthful then the commie propaganda websites.

Go give more money to the jew so he can buy more sport cars.

>What exactly do you think a "rich guy" does when he invests his money?
He hoards. Or he invests it in a Swiss account. Or he buy luxury products he doesn't need. Or he gambles it on the market. He doesn't help the local and direct economy anyhow.

>poor people weren't such consumerists
>poor people
>consumerists

Kek, they are struggling to eat and pay the rent at the same time but they are "consumerists"

Factually wrong. Minimum wage in Sweden and Finland is negotiated by all-powerful trade unions, something that will never happen in the country of temporary embarrassed millionaires.

>Even that honeypot piece of shit is more truthful then the commie propaganda websites.
No

L'humanité (paper of the communist party) is the most serious paper out there

>He hoards

Rich people don't "hoard", they invest their money into the market. I don't think you know what you're talking about.

>Kek, they are struggling to eat and pay the rent at the same time but they are "consumerists"

They are, they struggle to pay rent but they buy the newest iPhone and biggest tv they can afford.

>They are, they struggle to pay rent but they buy the newest iPhone and biggest tv they can afford.
Cool, go live on $7.25 an hour then, since it's easy if you're not an idiot.

Rich people do hoard. I've read several studies about it. The Panama papers, Swiss bank accounts, among many other things - what is it except hoarding ? Playing games on the food market of Africa, making the price of wheat unaffordable, what is it ?

>They are, they struggle to pay rent but they buy the newest iPhone and biggest tv they can afford.

That's because America is plagued by a credits mentality, which already caused an economic crisis.
The situation is mighty different for poor people in Europe.

Serious commie pyramid scheme enabling idiot brainwashing propaganda outlet.

>He hoards. Or he invests it in a Swiss account. Or he buy luxury products he doesn't need. Or he gambles it on the market. He doesn't help the local and direct economy anyhow.

He hoards because anytime a commie jew can take his money for dem programs and Audi r8s.
He buys luxury products because of the frivolous individualist modern culture.
He doesn't help local economy because the jewish globalist economy hunt any small business and bring cheap products from slave sweatshops in the world.

good lad

(((snopes)))

Nazis scums back to the containment board
You're just spouting buzzwords at this point

ahahahha

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

buzzwords

pfffffffffff

10 thousand

Thats the amount of jews in my 10 million people state

They are in every position of government, every high place in their multinational business located here

There is no local nothing

Then they all take huge amount of money over things produced here that is sold way cheaper overseas

Then commie jewess daughter of one of the richest people in here says how much of a shitlord nazi my shitskinned ass is and want more money to give to the darker skinned apes

No it doesn't. There is a certain time to pay ratio where it stops making sense to work, and considering muh free trade killed all of the jobs for lower middle class unskilled workers, it's very possible for a substantial chunk of the country to be stuck working at Starbucks.

Brexit, trump and all the rest are natural outpourings of the anger and resentment brought on by this process.

TLDR: although it may cause a higher unemployment rate, the role of the minimum wage in spreading wealth around and pacifying substantial parts of the country is more than worth it.

He can't even stump the Trump

Yes they do. The vast majority of real economists do believe in some kind of minimum wage, only Fox News and ayn rand shills believe otherwise.

No, he's a fucking commie.
That picture makes a good point though, usurious capitalism is just as bad as socialism.

flag
yes