Friendly reminder that Sup Forums is a pro net neutrality board

Friendly reminder that Sup Forums is a pro net neutrality board.

Neo-Nazis gtfo.

Pic unrelated.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Catalonia
cnet.com/news/telco-agrees-to-stop-blocking-voip-calls/
fortune.com/2009/04/03/group-asks-fcc-to-probe-iphone-skype-restrictions/
wired.com/2011/01/metropcs-net-neutrality-challenge/
businessinsider.com/verizon-blocking-google-wallet-2011-12
washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-tech/post/fcc-fines-verizon-125m-for-blocking-tethering-apps/2012/07/31/gJQAXjRLNX_blog.html
freepress.net/press-release/99480/att-blocking-iphones-facetime-app-would-harm-consumers-and-break-net-neutrality
savetheinternet.com/blog/2013/09/18/verizons-plan-break-internet
pcworld.com/article/169079/ATT_Blocks_Sup
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

no

Google shills pls go

No.
Trump be president now.
The retards are in charge.

Hmm...

>pro net neutrality
>Neo-Nazi

What if you're both?

This

It's the jews who are trying to own the internet, not nat socs.

Alright, I'll bite

What do we do user?

>everyone who doesn't agree with my opinion is a nazi and gtfo
>Sup Forums is pro giving the government an unchallenged monopoly on all internet service

i dont understand the connection between these 2

OP you are a retard

>wanting (((net neutrality)))

>>>/no/

>pro net neutrality
What that means?

...

There's nothing stopping a collective of individuals from creating a *voluntary* communal factory or farm or whatever.

>Sup Forums is pro giving the government an unchallenged monopoly on all internet service

are you serious? is this the bait ive been hearing about? surely you cant be serious... this is beyond retardation.

>implying the capitalist state wouldn't crush the commune if it began to challenge capital.

humans by their very nature divide everything up into categories or dare I say classes. Fuck off with this retardation

You mean nothing but the existing power structure stomping on them, you mean

Literally every time it happens the state accuses them of being "partisans" and seizes it using military force.
See: Paris, Kekalonia

They exist already. The capitalist state doesn't do anything. My aunt and uncle lived in one for quite a long time (I think it was in Pennsylvania). My parents are still friends with some people at a similar commune, it's in northern upstate NY.
>the existing power structure stomps them
What are examples of this?
>capitalist state crushes the commune if it challenges capital
Please elaborate on this
>kekalonia
What is this gay shit?
>paris
I'm not an expert, but that doesn't look very voluntary to me.

you are in favor of giving google, facebook, netflix, and all other corporations a free pass? they shouldn't be considered equal to a townie web service.

You didn't here? We're now Sup Forums - Videogames and Shilling

You're implying that, despite being on board with Trump becoming the President of the United States, I cannot support net neutrality.

I think you're retarded, and the mention of "neo-nazis" in your post definitely alludes to that, too.

>when you hate the american media machine so much you decide to give them full control over your last means of fighting it because you just can't bring yourself to admit you have common ground with liberals

>entire population agrees to it but it's not voluntary
>he doesn't know about catalonia
I'll have to look up on your Pennsylvania commune though. Sounds interesting.

don't you realize! Google and Facebook and Twitter and Microsoft and Apple all support Net Neutrality! They're our friends! CNN and Huffington Post and Buzzfeed support it too! All the good guy underdogs are fighting with you! Even George Soros is gonna pitch in and help! You'd be CRAZY not to trust this group!

Well, the boss is paying them to help him with his project.
The boss need the employee to finish his project, and the employee needs the boss to get paid.

>how to society

>entire population agrees
Citation needed, it looks like they just took over
>catalonia
Do tell
The Pennsylvania commune was I think Jainist, or some other Indian mysticism. They farmed and shit, I don't really keep in touch with them that much, they now live in a big comfy house in maine, with their kids and grandkids. Uncle was the guy who turned me onto computing, gave me an old PPC iMac, and I learned Unix on it.

of course the trumpster dumpsters dont care, they've never had to pay an internet bill in their life because they still live with their parents

they're in for a nasty surprise when they try to explain to mom and dad why they have to pay 5$ extra for access to Sup Forums though

>trumpster dumpsters
That's a pretty good one desu
>trump voters are all NEETs
I think you're getting them confused with bernouts

>don't you realize! Google and Facebook and Twitter and Microsoft and Apple all support Net Neutrality! They're our friends! CNN and Huffington Post and Buzzfeed support it too! All the good guy underdogs are fighting with you! Even George Soros is gonna pitch in and help! You'd be CRAZY not to trust this group!
wait a minute

Americans are fucking retarded, only in usa something like net neutrality would mean the following:

>one option makes you suck corporate cock
>the other makes you suck government cock

Nice freedom, freedom to let you choose who gets to fuck you in the ass.

Keep that shit in your pocket

The big tech companies that did picrelated support net neutrality, therefor I oppose it. I want them to suffer.

>he doesn't want an Orwellian government controlling every aspect of his life so he's a neo nazi

Unironically hang yourself desu senpai

This right here, all the wrong people are for it.

daily reminder that these people are calling the shots in burgerland right now

and it's perfectly ok to make fun of his crooked ass teeth because he lives in AMERICA, so if he WORKED HARD and got a JOB then he could PAY to fix them. the fact that he hasn't is purely indicative of LAZY KEKED SOCIALISM

The population of Paris kicked out the French government agents and military and said they were no longer going to acknowledge French law. I'm not sure exactly how you think it went down, but nobody had anything against it other than the Prussians and French "feds"

Of course companies like Google support net neutrality, they don't want to have to pay ISPs to get their sites (which provide them with the advertising revenue that makes up the vast majority of their income) included in the basic package.

Yeah, just don't complain later when your favorite site is going to load at 64kb/s because it didn't have the money to pay to your ISP so it won't throttle it.

Net neutrality is a way to go, Trump government is technologically illiterate. but he was the bad thing that america needed.
Also, start to fear when 90% of the servers on the world belongs to Facebook/Google/Amazon/Microsoft... oh wai...

Here's catalonia
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Catalonia

...

the entire population of england has crooked teeth, just for your information, m8

you are fucking retarded. you would rather try to 'hurt' big companies then keep the internet free. do you think ISPs directing your trafic to the sites they deem appropriate will help un-consolidate the web? do you?

Fuck my intension was dam im brainless today

>be socialist
>mock poor people
Why?

I'm reading up on it. I would agree, that that was immoral. However, the French constitution at the time did not guarantee free association or personal liberty. I don't think you can find an example of anything like that happening in the United States.

>wikipedia
Fuck off

Europeans of Sup Forums are pro net neutrality.
Americans of Sup Forums are against because they don't know how the internet works.

Both get what they want so that's good.

Yeah because that totally happened before net neutrality was instituted by Obama, right?

No you fucking retard, Google supports NN because they want a FREE and OPEN internet. They support democracy and freedom and women's rights, unlike the hateful BIGOTS who oppose NN.

It did.

t. virgin shitskin

Why is literally everything in one of the two sides?

Source: your ass

Women do not legitimately deserve rights beyond what they had in the 60's.

Underage.

>FREE and OPEN internet
*with added tracking ads

t. this kid

???
I'm not citing sources for an argument. He just doesn't know what Revolutionary Catalonia is and I'm trying to show him.

Americans are just brainwashed to suck corporate dick, you notice it in every discussion.

because king nigger politicized the issue for no reason at all

Why would you lie on the internet?

My superior

No seriously, stop pulling shit out of your ass. That never happened, but you were probably too young to remember the Bush and Clinton eras.

for someone who claims to hate plebbit you faggots sure spend a lot of time there

>cutting your nose off to spite your face

Global rule 2.
>forgetting the 2007

>its all obummas fault

this isnt going to work soon, friend

If he actually wanted NN he should have kept his mouth shut

*obummer

>Global rule 2.
Same to you, buddy.

*obomber

I'm not the one who got the Internet access in the 10's.

He's the reason the middle east is fucked up beyond recognition, not even bush made it as bad as obama.
Also, he almost pulled america into a new cold war.

t. not even american

>Also, he almost pulled america into a new cold war.
This
Obama was a fucked up marketing king, what's good about Trump is that he can be as bad as Obama but he is not seen as a saint, people know that Trump is a dick.
Obama fucked up so badly, 2 periods fucking it up but he played the democrat card and the black card.

this, people associating Trump with this are inane

And fuck it, I'm even willing to put up with all the SJW claptrap for their support on this.

What does Stallman thinks about net neutrality?

>Our boss needs us
>We don't need our boss
That's why you're working manual labour instead of being said boss. If you didn't have a boss you wouldn't have a job.the government will be your boss under communism. Hell, the person who gave you money to build something is your boss. So long as there is money rolling in there is a boss.
Fucking faggot commies.

Voting rights aren't rights at all. It was earned by signing up to go die in brutal wars.

not an argument

...

>There are people on Sup Forums who actually think comcast will play fair
>Implying they won't block Sup Forums for thought crime the moment they get the chance

I think you mean the FCC

fuck off retard

>I don't agree with the political views of Sup Forums so I've decided to slow it because I can
This is what will happen

If you want net neutrality then pass actual legislation through congress or your state government.
Don't hand the reigns on the internet over to a regulatory body whose stance on things will flip-flop depending on which party won the election.

Already illegal you dumb fucking retard

This is what would happen if the FCC was in control of internet traffic.

This. Also, it shouldn't even be the FCC, since the root of the problem is lack of competition between ISPs. It should be the FTC.

If it's illegal, then why have there been cases within the last decade of services being slowed down or blocked because they didn't like them

Post evidence please.

I like how you to mention that every instance of that happening the situation was resolved via existing regulations

nice octals 2^8

eurocucks don't get the concept of state congress and state law

*fail to mention

if you're wondering what ISPs will do if net neutrality is repealed, we already know.

2005 - Madison River Communications was blocking VOIP services. The FCC put a stop to it. cnet.com/news/telco-agrees-to-stop-blocking-voip-calls/

2005 - Comcast was denying access to p2p services without notifying customers.

2007-2009 - AT&T was having Skype and other VOIPs blocked because they didn't like there was competition for their cellphones. fortune.com/2009/04/03/group-asks-fcc-to-probe-iphone-skype-restrictions/

2011 - MetroPCS tried to block all streaming except youtube. wired.com/2011/01/metropcs-net-neutrality-challenge/

2011-2013, AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon were blocking access to Google Wallet because it competed with their bullshit. businessinsider.com/verizon-blocking-google-wallet-2011-12

2012, Verizon was demanding google block tethering apps on android because it let owners avoid their $20 tethering fee. This was despite guaranteeing they wouldn't do that as part of a winning bid on an airwaves auction. washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-tech/post/fcc-fines-verizon-125m-for-blocking-tethering-apps/2012/07/31/gJQAXjRLNX_blog.html

2012, AT&T - tried to block access to FaceTime unless customers paid more money. freepress.net/press-release/99480/att-blocking-iphones-facetime-app-would-harm-consumers-and-break-net-neutrality

2013, Verizon literally stated that the only thing stopping them from favoring some content providers over other providers were the net neutrality rules in place. savetheinternet.com/blog/2013/09/18/verizons-plan-break-internet

Also
pcworld.com/article/169079/ATT_Blocks_Sup Forums_Stirs_Internet_Hornets_Nest.html

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative

this image is actually perfect for the whole "why is title ii net neutrality needed if the internet was fine X years ago"

Because, data concentration wasn't worth charging for when it wasn't concentrated. now that it is, they found an easy avenue for more money that they want to exploit.

wow a bunch of mobile providers which were exempt from the now dead NN rules

>the left hates classes
>the left hates objectification
Wtf I love Java, C++, and OOP in general now