>"The laws of mathematics are very commendable, but the only law that applies in Australia is the law of Australia"
>The statement came during an exchange with a technology journalist at a Sydney press conference on Friday, after Turnbull had laid out government plans that seek to give police agencies access to encrypted messaging platforms like WhatsApp (owned by Facebook) and iMessage through a warrant.
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.fo
youtube.com
twitter.com
asies started shitposting IRL?
*aussies
anglos and their orwellian dreams. in the meantime the elite jerks off on cp and fiddle little children
>Sup Forums will defend this because muh nothing to hide
never use Facebook, or WhatsApp again. Real simple.
Damn, why is it always the conservatives who spout dumb, anti-scientific horseshit?
>buzzfeed
fuck off
>the only law that applies in Australia is the law of Australia
He should ban the laws of thermodynamics too.
What's so bad about BuzzFeed?
Clickbait galore, it's an entire website of nothing but clickbait articles like 10 things only 90s kids will remember.
>Conservatives spew anti science bullshit
>Liberals spew social science bullshit
I want to get off this wild ride.
fuck off, are you telling me Trumps golden shower was clickbait? kys liar
Its sole purpose is to harvest information about their users. Thus, articles such as "17 Things Only Asian Men Will Understand", "4 Signs That You Went to OSU" and so on.
So you guys are just jelly because they had the idea before you?
No, that was just defamation.
>What's so bad about BuzzFeed?
Everything
>strawman strawman xD epic win
(You)
>Board with the most normalfags won't defend this
They will
Nooooo! Now they will know I look at cuckhold porn now that my connection to blacked.com isn't over SSL!
most australians are idiots, so im not surprised the prime minister is.
Here you go boys
archive.fo
Thanks, Norwegian user.
sadly I'm not based norwegian bot
EXCLUSIVE OR BANNED IN AUSTRALIA
Assies*
What does Sup Forums have to do with this?
Being against NN ≠ being against encryption you fucking autists. You just want a reason to shout about muh Sup Forums boogeyman.
No one is "against encryption", you retard. We're against uncontrolled military grade encryption.
what's the point in using deliberately weak encyption?
you might as well not be using encryption if your system is designed to be broken anyway
It's supposed to be broken only with a warrant.
>what's the point of having a door if it's designed to be broken by the police anyway
cuck
So you want police to have free reign of your data?
Because, unlike terrorists and child pedophiles would like you to think, we aren't against privacy, we're just against it getting in the way of justice.
The fourth amendment will still protect it against unwarranted searches.
the only way to enforce that is to disallow anyone except those who will respond to such a request from holding decryption keys, the strength of the encryption doesn't matter
breakable barries such as doors work like DRM, the act of breaking them may be made illegal, regardless of how weak the barrier is
like police tape, it might be illegal for you to cross it, despite being trivial to do so, it just helps form a definitive line that makes it clear to someone who seeks to cross it, that they are breaking the law
Literally KYS.
nope, we've been trashing on every aussie we see.
||
||>
||3
||
Gee, I wonder who could be behind this post.
You do understand that if it exists, it CAN AND WILL be used by black hats, right?
>he wants to stop the terrorists.
>they all use telegram and facebook
>bikies are switching to blackberries and getting their chink friends to install an app that fries the mobo on swipe.
>enough is enough
The train will never stop
>muh military grade
oh shit dude. when you said that i almost spit out my military grade water. they drink this stuff in the army so its gotta be controlled right?
JUST
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOO STOP USING ENCRYPTION THAT IS ACTUALLY EFFECTIVE
That's all I hear you saying. What would be the point of using encryption at all if it could be easily defeated?
Mark distefano is buzzfeed (Australia)'s only good writer
Why does he waste his life to ((them))
BAN MILITARY-GRADE ASSAULT ALGORITHMS
DO NOT LET YOUR CHILDREN GET NEAR PRIME NUMBERS, THEY ARE INTERNATIONAL TERRORIST PEDOPHILES
Emu War 2.0?
BAN CERTAIN COMBINATIONS OF ONES AND ZE- oh wait
The brits are pushing this mandatory backdoor bullshit too.
Malcom is a fucking dumbass
Reminder that Ajit Pai sued Netflix for using encryption.
Just a matter of time until same happens in the US.
>the only way to enforce that is to disallow anyone except those who will respond to such a request from holding decryption keys
Which totally won't be a problem.
I mean, who decides which countries get keys? Are the governments of Russia, Iran, China, etc any less entitled to these encryption keys once you decide these WORLDWIDE COMPANIES need to start making backdoors for you?
Yeah, I am totally sure Russia will only use the keys in order to stop illegal activity and not to decrypt tons of international traffic.
Every single country who talks about this shit is only thinking of their country. Even if they don't understand the danger of backdoors in security they don't even think about all the other fucking countries that will legitimately be able to demand the keys.
People always love to bring up the "terrorists" and "pedophiles" as being the justification, we can't fight them because they use encryption! But law enforcement is managing. Every day you hear about more pedophiles being arrested. For every successful terrorist attack in the west others are prevented. Some of them don't use encryption. Some of them don't even use electronic communication.
The biggest problem law enforcement has is manpower. That's all.
>Voting in conservative retards that don't understand how technolo/g/y works
SASUGA AUSFAILIA
that's a nazi symbol, user
Yes, every digital problem ends in naked children pictures.
I'm just going to get cybernetic implants and encrypt my whole body. The point of it is for it not to be broken, you fucking retards. If the government can get into it easily, criminals can get into it easily, and there's no point in having it at all.
>jelly
He talks like this unironically
Cryptography is literally Hitler
>'straya
i do love that video.
must be weird being
Deciphering cryptography is literally computers.
(and gay).
It's going to be amazing when all the limp wristed aussies finally get the immigration they've been praying for and blaming on the PM the country is instantly turned into a third world shithole.
did you just assume my true age to be my biological age????
no, actually, i wasn't talking about you, but in general
>did you just assume my post's intention?
Australian here AMA
Person in Australia but isn't Australian here, AMA
Doors aren't designed to be broken by the police. There's nothing stopping you from installing a bank vault door on the front of your house. Most doors are ABLE to be broken down by the police. But it's the responsibility of the police to break them. Door manufacturers aren't required to provide the police with master keys for all their doors.
...
it did not
"hello there, matey. If you'd just like to step to the side for a moment, nothing to worry about, just standard procedure stuff."
They both spew anti science horseshit
>
>No one is "against encryption", you retard. We're against uncontrolled military grade encryption.
>militar grade
He's back guys
>be teenager
>try to buy alcohol
"I identify as a 20-year-old".
Dumb animuposter.
(((science)))
>safe schools
Oh No
BRING
BACK
TONE
We hate the NSA, retard communist nigger.
The US, UK, Australia, Jesus. Anglos have a real tendency towards bootlicking.
>we hate the NSA
>we just hate "terrorists" more
Fuck off, you capitalist pig!
get out
Can't they just make personal encryption illegal?
Commie filth get out. Sup Forums is a national socialist website.
>pi is de jure 4
Yes, Richard Steele's dossier was unreliably sourced and mostly fabricated.
It's called cryptanalysis faggot
Isn't whatsapp end to end encrypted right now? How would they implement a backdoor, a special client that snoops on cleartext on demand?
>get out
Make me.
>supposed to be
>neoliberals
Are you really this trusting?
>terrorists
Define terrorists, and compare and contrast with bourgeois politics.
Enforcing the use of a particular group for Diffie-Hellman would do it. See weakdh.org
>on Sup Forumsnulag
>national socialist
I think you should reconsider your Boardchoice Sup Forumsfag
>unironically using the word "bourgeois"
>implying that muh private property is any concern of the propertyless employee
So he's the guy from Life of Brian arguing he should have the right to have babies even though he physically can't?
youtube.com
they both do that
republicans and democrats are the sides to the same jew coin wake up shill
If your idea of national socialism is making frog memes and welcoming in redditors, I'll pass.
What's wrong with using the word? You probably live in a bourgeois "democracy", at least get into the habit of using the word while you're at it.
>something about a board I don't like with no reason to think the board says it
Sup Forums is anti nsa, pro privacy.
>>Class analysis is degenerate REEEEEEEEEE