Overclocked Ryzen 3 1300X ($129) beats i7-7700K ($339) in PCMark 10

>Overclocked Ryzen 3 1300X ($129) beats i7-7700K ($339) in PCMark 10.
IT'S OVER, INTEL IS FUCKING FINISHED!

Other urls found in this thread:

tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-3-1300x-cpu,5149.html
computerbase.de/2017-07/amd-ryzen-3-1300x-1200-test/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

RIP in pieces

it's not even 8 threads right right?

That's a cherry picked as fuck benchmark, but the reality still is that an overclocked R3 1300X is a great CPU.

>Stock 7700K

How the fuck.

oy vey, this is very disturbing.. we'll have to up our rebates

Intel pajeets btfo

1 Ryzen core vs 1 Intel thread, maybe?

Mother of all programs!

...

ahahah

How the fuck indeed. It's even faster that Ryzen 5.

new stepping ;))))))))))))))

noooo!! this can't be happening

The question is can I mine monero with it?

No 7700K in this one. But look at the productivity score.
It does seem high for the overclocked 1300

Yeah and make $3 a month.

Sure it is. Look at the OC3D review. It's a subtest of the PCMark10 benchmark.
But it's somethign to try to understand about what goes on with these chips!
And that's the great part about this. Gallons and coffee and review upon review!

+24% performance
+140% cost

what are you some kinda a poorniggerfaggot?

Enjoy the OC housefire

These userbenchmark and cpuboss sites are shit though. I'd have to read up on my specific kinds of software.
Would I pay twice the price to render 25% faster in Premiere? Probably.

Not mayo TIM though. The guy who made OP's graph said he cooled the overclocked chip with the stock cooler, without seeing alarming temps.

Using cpuboss in 2k17...
>nomie

>amd
>housefire
>not intel
I hope you realize how retarded you look right not

Literally doesn't make a difference. People who buy those $100-$300 CPUS only care about video games or budget. Why to fuck even the 4c Ryzen can't oc beyond 4Ghz is a mistery to me.

Node limitation.

tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-3-1300x-cpu,5149.html

Intel BTFO

What was the power consumption though?
I don't care much for performance, I'm interested about performance per energy consumed.

Fuck all according to gamers nexus.

Sick graph mate

>bought 7700k
>underclocked
>undervolted
>turned off hyperthreading

pretty comfy here

What does the red graph represent?
Sorta want

Doesn't that just turn it into a 2500K?

Hardware Unboxed is hellbent on shilling Ryzen by making cherrypicked graphs

He literally OCs 1200 and 1300s and compare them to stock Intels

i3-7350K shouldn't even be on the list as it's in a completely different price bracket at $160 w/o a stock cooler and requires Z270 mobo to OC.

Too bad it's utter trash for gaming

Sup Forums - Gayming

This fuck that fanboy

Too bad you already tried this song and dance in that other shit thread and got your stupid ass handed to you there, too.

You're right, most people will ofcourse buy that cpu for running passmark all day

>I ignored the facts and tried to get the 7350k out of the equation
>this way the 1300x seems less bad

Doesn't change reality that this thing is horrible for gaming.

Look at it, it's literally below a 930 in 3 of the benchmarks

that's the point though

if Ryzen sucks at gaming, then why doesn't it come with an iGPU so you don't have to buy a dedicated GPU?

AMD are retards

Is this trolling? You can't OC locked Intel cpus, it's not AMD's problem.

>you can't oc a 7350k

Along with bentium, i3 and, golly, an i5

7350k+z chipset+aftermarket cooler puts it against 1400, not 1300 or 1200.

i7-930 is a 4 core 8 thread CPU that cost $300 when it came out, so your comparison is pretty retarded.

What an amazing gaming cpu

>you can't OC a 7700k
>you can't OC a 7350k
>you can OC a k Intel CPU

It's not retarded when a 2 core 4 thread cpu from Intel (the 7350k) is miles above it but the 4 core 4 thread cpu from AMD is below it.

Try again

How the fuck does it beat the r5's

Here's one with four games in one graph

They don't seem to want to understand this fact.

You can, it just so happens to be a R3 review, so its contenders are unoverclockable 7100 and 7300

Not if you factor in more expensive memory kits you are obligated to use with Ryzen

And even then, considering how big the gap is, that looks like 20$ well spend

>tfw my 4770k is literally the same as a 1700X

Welp

I guess I'm waiting for Cannon Lake or Ice Lake

>muh gaymes

Back to your containment board Sup Forumsermin

They don't seem to be overclocked. But feel free to call the developer and ask how PCMark 10 is put together.

>in 2010

You are not obliged to use expensive memory with r3

Funny thing is. I have never been to Sup Forums once.
Not a single time.

You are, if you want good results because of infinity fabric it is heavily dependent on the use of fast ram

Steve look like a jew, is he ?

I play games in 4k.
Getting tired of my bulldozer are the r3 okay for 4k gayming?

>dat glorious mane
Yeah...no

>z-chipset
Entry level Z270 boards are like 10$ than B350 4+1 VRM housefires
>aftermarket cooler
Just as with Ryzen, you're not getting that 4.0 at 1.35V on the stock cooler. Unless you enjoy fires of course.

Any DDR4 will do just fine. IF scales with ram speed, but so are intel processors apparently.

Samefag. Angry the OC3D graph destroyed his cherry picked points.

Cheapest b350 is 65-70, cheapest z270 is 100-105, that's not a $10 difference.
Hardware unboxed managed that overclock on a stock cooler with acceptable temps. 3.8-3.9 is definitely achievable with stock cooler.

>you're not getting that 4.0 on the stock cooler
Tell that to hardware unboxed, who did exactly that. Said temps were fine.

>Cheapest b350 is 65-70
And the VRM temps are 110+

Again, the differences between ram speed are much greater with Ryzen then they are with Intel due to the use of infinity fabric scaling with memory speed

You're thinking of X299

On a 1800x maybe. Any VRM will easily get you to 4.0 on a ryzen 3, it consumes 40w tops. You seem to have no idea of what are you talking about, so please stop.

>destroyed
>it's still well below the 7350k oc

lol

>Gears of war 4 CPU render
>CPU render
You realize if they had omitted that this graph would prove the R3 1200 is only 9 FPS below an I9 7900X OC in an average over 3 games? Intel can only pull ahead when you go full retard and ignore the GPU. That's pretty embarrassing.

We gotta give Intel this.
Intel stops seeing major gains from RAM speed before 3200MHZ
Ryzen seem to level around 3600

Sure

>4K gayming
Your bottleneck is likely the GPU, but get an R5 so you can alleviate CPU bottlenecks, too.

Actually no, ram scaling is somewhat on par with kaby lake platform. IF only affects core latencies between CCXs, they are not as important for Ryzen 3. Anyway, 2666 is attainable on any ddr4 ram with the latest BIOS.

>source my ass

Your argument was not that the i3 was better.
To my knowledge it's more expensive.
You argument was these R3 chips are shit for gaming. Looks just fine to me for a budget part.

>actualy no
Actualy yes

Ryzen 3 consists of two ccx's with both 2 cores disabled you fucking idiot

It is, and?

It's not fine when it's worse than the competition which is roughly in the same price bracket.

Ryzen cpu's don't exist in a vacuum you know

His point is that then the IF still comes into play

i3-7350K build is $85 more expensive and that's with several mail-in rebates. They aren't in the same price bracket ..

And so it matters

I CAN'T TAKE THIS ANYMORE

Again, you have to understand what IF is for to properly assess its importance. Demand for memory bandwidth is lesser when the cpu has only 4 threads.

>not picking a cooler for the ryzen cpu
>expecting a 4 ghz overclock
lol

>roughly
For the modern penny pincher it looks like a good purchase

In theory, somewhat. Do you have benchmarks to back up your assertion of R3 scaling better with ram speeds than i3s?

Well you can count it out for the use in most htcp's since it doesn't have an igp

Once again. Both OC3D and Hardware Unboxed suggest that that's entirely fine.

well, to be honest the Ryzen also needs a B350/X370 motherboard to overclock, and not the entry-level A320 boards.

idle 44W like the other Ryzens (more than intel), on torture loop some 97-105W.

Another test in German (but the numbers are numbers):

computerbase.de/2017-07/amd-ryzen-3-1300x-1200-test/

Stock cooler is decent enough
Besides you could pick up a 212 Evo and Ryzen would still be $50 cheaper

That still would not close the price gap, and you can get to 3.8 GHz easily anyway.

Here's an even more compelling reason not to bother with the i3-7350K, though.

That's a completely different talk than this gayman shit.
But I fully agree with that. Raven Ridge is gonna make these parts less desirable.

Do you have benchmarks that it to back up your assertion that it doesn't matter for R'3'?

No

Is it reasonable to expect it matters since the r5's and r7's are very sensitive for ram frequency and the r3 is based on the same architecture?

Yes