Trump praises for Saddam Hussein's efficient killing of 'terrorists,'
>"He was a bad guy -- really bad guy. But you know what? He did well? He killed terrorists. He did that so good. They didn't read them the rights. They didn't talk. They were terrorists. Over. Today, Iraq is Harvard for terrorism," Trump said.
Trumpdrones are literally defending Saddam Hussein
What a world
Angel Russell
Assad did it too.
Luis Gomez
Idiot Trump said he was a bad guy
David Perez
I'd say Afghanistan is the Harvard of terrorism since all those important lads like Bin Laden, al-Zarqawi and Azzam radicalised there.
Iraq is like the Yale at best.
Dylan Gutierrez
well some people praise their country for using nukes on civilians so theres that
Landon Lee
>I know words. I have the best words. Is trump able to speak in sentences more than 3 words or is that too complicated for him?
Elijah Baker
Why does Donald Trump speak in grammatically incorrect sentence fragments?
Brandon Baker
telling an Iraqi you like Saddam is like telling a German you like Hitler he's really a genocidal maniac, bush not having good intentions doesn't make him a saint
Daniel Morales
I think he's trying to be as colloquial as possible. It makes him easier to understand and easier to quote.
James Roberts
Says more about his audience than him.
Kevin Campbell
Kek, you should see some of the Facebook comments from "Iraqis" on the Chilcot enquiry. >When Sadaam was the ruler the country was more or less in peace >Free water >Free healthcare >Cheap petrol >People living in peace >Going to school college uni. >No one shooting each other >No one bombing each other...
Ryder Baker
lmao well if those people approve of peace through exterminating anyone who isnt of his sect/ideology then hes not bad
James Scott
But he's always like this though? Listen or read his meeting with the Washington Posts editorial board. It's really something.
Lincoln Anderson
Ouch.
Angel Gray
>only
You are forgetting about a lot.
Trump is correct though.
Zachary Rivera
Did he do that? I thought he killed less people than the dudes now.
on that note:
Was Gadhafi better than how it is currently?
>He kept fugees fromdrowning at least...
Lincoln Mitchell
rumsfeld sez 'its chill'
Aiden Sullivan
t. "Libya is totally better now that it's in civil war" shill
Pew Polls showed that the vast majority of Iraqis preferred Saddam to now. It also showed the same for Libyans and Gaddafi.
Zachary Brooks
Why was Saddam a bad guy and various dictators funded by US not? How would a Harvard proffessor answer such question?
James Ortiz
>Saddam exterminated shias
William Diaz
It's a negotiating technique I think. I can't remember it's name but he's basically trying to create a kind of false familiarity by talking in a colloquial manner.
Gabriel Harris
yeah he did >was Gaddafi better we're recovering from a bloody civil war so its shittier than under gaddafi slightly but im happy with current Libya link me the polls, srsly i hate polfags >he hates dictators >hes a shill go suck a dick gawad en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Saddam_Hussein's_Iraq
Connor Martinez
this USA aren't saints either but cuz USA are shit doesn't mean the dictators they took down are saints , either
Nathaniel Williams
based baath knew how to deal with k*rd menace.
Matthew Gonzalez
>yeah he did
Source?
>I prefer civil war Okay.
>link me the polls You do it yourself.
They are a google search away.
>wikipedia Could I have a better source for genocide of shias? Because every source I see is saying that there were massacres but not a genocide.
Dominic Evans
>Source? I just sourced it >Okay. I prefer not having to bribe a banker to get my paycheck >You do it yourself. I just googled and found nothing im 100% you just made that shit up >Could I have a better source for genocide of shias? Because every source I see is saying that there were massacres but not a genocide. what?
Xavier Gray
Wikipedia is not a source. That is a link.
Christian Allen
Holy shit you're so retarded go back to your containment board
Michael Baker
you seriously need to get a gun and shoot yourself
>Iraqi views can again be described as conflicted: 22% saying they are happy; 35% saying they are worried; and 30% saying they feel both emotions. where does it say they love Saddam?
Jordan Ortiz
So shouldn't the Libyan link the sources?
I could post links to StormFront websites that assert Egyptians were Nordic. But that's not a source.
Sebastian Howard
>But he posted a link. Not a source. >Secondary sources are not sources Did you finish high school?
Joshua Foster
forgot to say the question asked in the pol is what they feel about USA leaving Iraq
James Ramirez
Where did I state "Iraqis love Saddam"?
I call you a shill because you never address the argument or provide sources. You always try using your own anecdotes or link wikipedia.
That's literally what Sup Forums does in arguments.
Oliver Richardson
Wikipedia is not a secondary source you retard.
Which connects directly to them removing Saddam... We wouldn't be there if we didn't remove Saddam. Are you being purposefully obtuse?
Jeremiah Barnes
He gave you a link to a source. Are you really too lazy to scroll to the bottom of the page and find the source for yourself? Think you're just being a contrarian, shit-stirring mong tbqh.
Charles Cook
>Where did I state "Iraqis love Saddam"? >Pew Polls showed that the vast majority of Iraqis preferred Saddam to now. It also showed the same for Libyans and Gaddafi >I call you a shill because you never address the argument or provide sources. You always try using your own anecdotes or link wikipedia. >That's literally what Sup Forums does in arguments. sooo wikipedia is not a valid source? are you trolling? i'm pretty sure you're trolling
Joshua Nelson
Oh, does he mean the Kurds that Saddam bombed indiscriminately and that we promised to protect? What a fucking retard. He keeps on saying the stupidest shit, it's like he's trying to sink his own campaign. The only thing holding him afloat is the power of retards to believe in him no matter what he says.
Lincoln Murphy
>a link to a source
No he did not. That's a link to a website. Not a source.
At least fucking greentext the area that talks about Shia genocide. Linking a website is not linking a source.
Wikipedia itself is the link to the source. Are you merely pretending?
Easton Powell
No he isn't Watch some of his older interviews
James Watson
>In scholarship, a secondary source is a document or recording that relates or discusses information originally presented elsewhere. Thats literally what Wikipedia, a history book or a dictionary does super autismo man
Andrew Young
So you were incapable of showing where I stated "Iraqis loved Saddam."
No but doesn't make the good things any worse The good things we should also do
Anthony Roberts
>wikipedia is a link to a source
He linked www.wikipedia.org
Not sources from wikipedia.
Cameron Walker
So again, you're just too lazy to scroll to the bottom and find the source yourself. Playing semantics isn't making you look like any less of an idiot.
Gabriel Bennett
The thing is, sandniggers can't handle democracy. You need an average IQ of 90+ in your population for a democracy to work. They don't have that. Sand niggers need a brutal dictator to keep the barbarians in check otherwise they start allahu akbarring each other.
Andrew Bailey
You seem to have trouble reading your own dictionary.
Secondary sources are interpretations of primary sources. Not interpretations of secondary sources.
Wikipedia is not a source. It's a repository for links to sources.
Jacob Roberts
I did. There was FUCKING NOTHING on Shia genocide by Saddam.
Chase Hernandez
>good things such as? pic related
Hunter Parker
>Proven wrong with sources at the bottom >Instead of using the sources to show what's wrong, spergs out "WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A VALID INTERNET DEBATE SOURCE WE4RE IN HARVARD HERE EVERYONE MUST SPEND HOURS TO DO HIS RESEARCHES"
Xavier Fisher
You have failed miserably and therefore resort to ad hominems.
Pathetic.
I used Harvard to prove Wikipedia is not a valid source. You were incapable of showing where I supposedly claimed "Iraqis loved Saddam." You were incapable of providing a valid source for your claims of Shia genocide by Saddam.
Pic related will soon be you.
Dylan Parker
Saddam? What Trump said
Carson Murphy
I have no idea how we got here I'm sorry user i love Gaddafi i'm gonna hang a green flag on my house forgive me I have learned my mistakes
Evan Price
Well then link the valid source and not Wikipedia, fuckwit
Oliver Watson
Nice strawman after losing the argument.
1. Wikipedia is not a valid source.
2. Nowhere in the fucking entire Wikipedia page was there anything to do with his claimed "Shia genocide by Saddam."
3. Stop being autistic.
Adrian Miller
>I KILL YOU BCUZ YOU SANDNIGGER DURR DURR HURR BUT DONT YOU DARE CALLING ME A TROLL
Cooper Martin
>you in this thread
Parker Stewart
Im not trying to prove anything are you unable to understand human communications? Im just mocking the retard you are
Hunter Moore
Where did I claim Gaddafi was good? I only mentioned him once in the post about polling.
>I'll kill you
Nope. That's the work of ISIS with Libyan militias. Stop being autistic.
Noah Wilson
>Trump says something that is pretty obvious >"OMG what a monster!"
Elijah King
Oh yes surely this postwasn't trying to attack my character.
What a completely pointless discussion with a bunch of autists.
Cry me a fucking river And go back to tumblr or whatever your preferred sjw site is
Easton Roberts
wait a second hating dictators is sjw stuff now? only sjws hate genocide? what happened to this world?
Jonathan Anderson
>saying genocide is bad is now tumblr-tier What a time to be alive.
Alexander Morales
No, he said that the murikan was a disgusting human being, and for what?
Ryder Sanchez
For mocking someone from a country in severe political turmoil, posting pictures of the recently deceased and implying that said person should join them.
Charles Adams
Exactly. Shit that happens here every day If that makes you feel disgusted, sick and triggered, then please, fuck off back to tumblr
>bad things happen all the time so bad things are ok You've let too much apathy into your mind, user.
Asher Sanchez
This is a place for "bad things" If you don't like it, go somewhere else
Camden Wright
No it isn't, it's a place for (relatively) unmoderated discussion. People here choose to be vile, it is not enforced.
Parker Phillips
And people on tumblr choose to get offended by everything, like you do, so why don't you go and be with your kin? Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.
Wyatt Cox
last i checked the description for the board was >a board for international discussion and culture
Blake Brooks
So we all agree that its better to keep a dictator in charge of a country instead of removing him and thus creating a power vacuum which will be filled with unchecked extremists?
Jaxon Davis
Your obsession with tumblr aside, words can hurt people, only the mentally ill are never hurt by what others say.
Dominic Watson
Meant Sup Forums in general And it's completely normal to get upset about something an anonymous American said about some anonymous libyan?
Wyatt Ross
I know empathy isn't very cool or edgy but it does actually exist.
Jaxson Russell
Internet isn't all serious business lad
Dominic Wood
Phone's dying lads
Jason Garcia
A lot of it is though. Are you trying to imply that the post in question was some kind of joke?
Zachary Powell
Well I'm implying that you shouldn't take it too seriously either And my point was and still is that if that kind of posts disgusts you maybe this isn't the right place for you
Kevin Ward
I've had many interesting discussions here; I'm not going to leave just because some professional apathists want to make everyone feel as miserable and hollow as they are.
Jaxson Morgan
Hook it to the charger lad
Wyatt Baker
You know you can hide posts that make you upset?
Ian Reed
I do know that.
Henry Jenkins
>"He was a bad guy -- really bad guy. But you know what? He did well? He killed terrorists. He did that so good. They didn't read them the rights. They didn't talk. They were terrorists. Over. Today, Iraq is Harvard for terrorism," Trump said.
My god, that speech Is Trump a 10 years old ?
Gabriel Jackson
You know You can speak differently to make a different effect on the listeners For instance, our retarded ex-pm always listed three things no matter what the subject was