>22c/44t Xeons BTFO by stock threadripper.
Oy vey. Delet.
22c/44t Xeons BTFO by stock threadripper
Kayden Cruz
Other urls found in this thread:
ranker.sisoftware.net
tomshardware.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
phoronix.com
twitter.com
Tyler Price
I agree that TR makes the entire Xeon lineup obsolete 20 cores and down if you don't care for support.
But Sandra is a really garbage benchmark
Asher Stewart
It's selling like hotcakes already. That is crazy high placement for a $1000 CPU.
Kayden Anderson
Michael Morris
Nuclear clocks on the 7900X
Ethan Perry
delid your thread op
Liam Collins
I CAN'T TAKE THIS ANYMOOOOOOOOOOORE
Brandon Anderson
That's pretty low clocks. Unless it's conventional cooling. With LN2 that thing should easily go over 5GHz.
Jose Wright
How is Linux support for thread ripper?
Jonathan Butler
That thing is already north of 300 watts at those clocks
Dylan Perry
which is nothing.
Chase Thomas
tell that to the boards VRMs that resiliently try to melt themself at this power draw
Jose Campbell
properly cool them.
Grayson Morgan
Same as ryzen 7
Cooper Bell
If you're doing that level of OCing you can afford to mount some fans or even water cool your VRMs
Cooper Hill
low clocks on 7900x with so many cores...
you had 0 on physics eh
Xavier Gray
SHUT IT DOWN NOW
Noah Evans
7900x runs at 4ghz stock, a measly 10% OC is already pushing thermals, have you missed all the skylake-x coverage about this?
These things get so hot you can't even stress test them properly.
Blake Green
Yeah, they are low clocks. You can easily go over 5GHz with LN2.
Jaxon Sanchez
Yes with air cooling or low level water cooling.
I'm not retarded though if I'm pushing 250w+ through a CPU and VRMs I expect to be cooling them adequately.
Jacob Reed
what about a 340mm rad at 30mm deep.
Shouldn't that cool it down?
Isaiah Foster
and then your motherboard traces start melting because the board manufacturers were not notified that the board would have to feed >300W to the socket. Or the socket itself starts to melt, as happened with many overclocked 8350s when they were drawing that much power. 300W isn't nothing. No sane person would clock a 10c part that high. There's no reason to.
Alexander Taylor
NO IT CAN'T BE!!! I JUST MORTGAGED MY HOUSE FOR A XEON!!
Kayden Johnson
>There's no reason to.
Says who? More performance is always needed.
Tyler White
480mm rad is low level watercooling? Tom's had to use a fucking COMPRESSOR for theirs at 4.6Ghz because their AIO amd custom loop failed.
Gavin Wilson
Come on dude. There is being tech illiterate, and then there is this. You're going full retard.
If you want to talk about "no reason", there is literally no reason for a normal person to buy Intel Skylake-X platform. Ever. If you're not OCing one on LN2 for sick scores, then you have no excuse to own it at all. So fuck off with your "no sane person would clock a 10c part that high". No "sane" person would buy this in the first place, fuckwad.
Isaiah Ramirez
Holocaust 2.0
Robert Kelly
NOOOO I GAVE UP MY FIRST BORN FOR A 22c XEON NOOOOOO HOW WILL I TELL MY WIFES SONS MOTHER NOW
Nolan Thompson
No sane person would buy a xeon? Not very bright are you.
Liam Hall
that could be remedied though but a water cooled cooling plate on the back of the motherboard
that case is going to be the EATX case with or maybe even two of them.
I've seen FX9590 setups run super cool with this set up with a max temp of 65C at Max OC
Just how much heat are we talking here?
Austin Davis
you must be retarded
Dominic Foster
>4k usd server cpu btfo by 1k usd desktop cpu
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Colton Ramirez
Let's hear it for the incredible shrinking clockspeeds. The 18 core CPU will probably only be 40% faster than the 10 core due to the massive disparity. Of course, it'll still cost twice as much. Intel!
Caleb Smith
If I wasn't bright, I'd actually be buying this garbage.
Oliver Parker
Bulldozer was soldered, this isn't.
Lucas Brown
DELE DIS
Thomas Bell
Also, speaking of not bright. We aren't even talking about the Xeons. Nobody should buy those. Not even LN2 OCers.
Jordan James
who will buy xeons when threadripper and epyc is well above them costing less and having less tdp ?
yeah you guessed right the imaginery intel buyers
Robert Morgan
Intel cpus are battle tested. Fuck off goyim.
Christian Lewis
i can imagine they are full of battle scars and burned pins
Charles Perry
Xeons are still prefered for rotational databases, EPYC doesn't fare to well there due to the MCM design.
Let's not pretend Xeons are useless just because EPYC is impressive
Owen Hall
>Just how much heat are we talking here?
We are talking "massively inefficient thermal transfer" levels of heat. tomshardware.com
Nolan Garcia
>yfw Intel user
>yfw happy AMD can finaly bring some competition
Coffe lake 6c/12t here I come
Christopher Roberts
Are these Skylake-X xeons or Broadwell Xeons?
Alexander Long
I want to see some specs and pricing before I start hyping up Coffee Lake.
Easton Cook
why not just switch to AMD?
Aaron Baker
It's another iteration of kabylake/skylake so clockspeeds should be good
Jonathan Wilson
Skylake -EP
Juan Baker
cause he believes that intel will provide low tdp with monster high clocks
Joseph Cox
Because on the gamer side of things, which I mainly use my cpu for, Intel is still king.
Although I wouldn't argue that the 1600 isn't the best bang for buck because it is.
Henry Peterson
Except it has two more cores and the same TDP, which means lower clocks and worse OC because they still put toothpaste under the lid.
Cooper Hernandez
You can get more performance by buying a different part. You might even end up saving money by buying a part that doesn't require an equal value in cooling equipment. You might even end up saving money by not replacing parts every few weeks from the extreme electrical stress you're putting them under.
...you're seriously saying my argument is wrong by claiming that nobody is going to use these things? And I'm going full retard?
At that point you're wasting a ton of money on cooling and there's still no guarantee that it's enough, since the motherboards themselves are probably going to fail. Remember that the boards weren't designed with these parts in mind. Some of the boards may not be able to deal with the nominal power draw of certain Skylake-X parts, let alone overclocked parts.
Seriously guys, the board manufacturers themselves are upset they weren't notified about what was coming with Skylake-X and you think you're just going to add a bunch of fans and be fine? Take a hint.
Samuel Cox
the 7800k doesn't have any problems reaching 4.5 ghz either, so I'm not too worried, and if temps are a problem I can Always...delid
Oliver Williams
It's still mayonaise but now with more cores, it's also denser than skylake-x and thus will be harder to cool.
Josiah Martin
>it's also denser than skylake-x
It isn't, it's also made on a 14nm node
Robert Clark
Thanks user
Goodness its the damn TIM
For fucks sake who's stupid idea was this?
Bentley Reed
>For fucks sake who's stupid idea was this?
Robert Garcia
And it will still be the best, because of the clockspeed advantage.
If you are looking for efficiency or low thermals, you shouldn't be looking for cpu's with those kind of clock speeds anyway.
To each their own
Xavier Collins
it saves them 0.1$ per CPU user. Why can't you understand their sound economic decision?
William Thompson
To be fair, it's a workstation CPU.
Daniel Murphy
just wish they would test them before launch
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
intel.com
Brody Lopez
It's denser, 6 core coffee will be around 150mm2 at most, skylake-x LCC die is twice the size at 308mm2, and that's a CPU only die, the coffeelake shares around half of its tiny die with a GPU, so probably around 80-90mm2 for the x86 parts.
You're not cooling that at high clocks, no way in hell, Intel can't beat physics
Isaiah Reed
As Always, I will await the benchmarks and see for myself.
Grayson Edwards
you are actually thinking that doffe is actually a new cpu?
Hunter Martin
You're making no sense.
Wyatt Sanders
You actually think Intel would rebrand the same CPUs twice?
Justin Miller
...
Tyler Thompson
twice? as far as anyone with a decent understanding goes its 4th time already
Michael Edwards
I don't think its full rebrand I think it might be a refresh of one of the skylake -x chip'sthere are a few mods I can think of at the top of my head that might help limit heat output.
there is a few ways to cheat pyshics its not all black and white.
But if they keep using that shit TIM they can forget any gains.
Joseph Parker
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HUEMONKEYS BTFO
Jaxson Allen
Because clock speeds are lower. AMD struck gold with IF. It somehow allows relatively high clocks while having shitload of cores.
Samuel Ortiz
UMA DELICIA
SOPA DE MOCACO
OY VEEEEEEYYY
Carson Anderson
>7900X @ 4.52GHz
Gabriel Lopez
>r5 2600 comes along
>7nm 5GHz process
>compatible with existing AM4 motherboards
>Meanwhile Coffee lake stuck on a dead socket
Think ahead user
Kayden Bennett
>workstation
>almost all of the motherboards available for it come with RGB LEDs and gamer-related names
Camden Turner
...
Caleb Nelson
ryzen series would infinitely destroy intel if their next revision can hit 4.5ghz.
Zen's IPC is extremely high that they keep comparing 3.7 OC'd ryzens to 5.1ghz 7700k and the results are still hilarious against intel.
Cooper Wilson
DELET THIS NOW GOY
Dominic Ortiz
ryzen 2 will be a full blown second shoah if its on 10nm
Nicholas Myers
Zen2 is in 7nm LP.
Dominic Myers
I think we can all agree that the features of the chip determine whether or not it is workstation class and not the propensity of chinks to put LEDs on the motherboard.
Carter Hernandez
T. Retard
Bentley Bell
>How is Linux support for X?
lol
Xavier Martin
Good goy, remember to buy a new $300 mobo
Cooper Barnes
No. Skylake X and Broadwell E are way to big to be repurposed as a consumer CPU. Not possible for the prices. Their top of the line consumer CPU must be a fully unlocked ship, not one with 40% disabled cores.
Anthony Thompson
>22c56t beats 16c32t
WOAH I NEVER WOULD HAVE GUESSED
Ethan Green
It's the 28c 56t on top, which is Intel's latest flagship Xeon. Learn to read.
Also the flagship Xeon is only 15% faster, lol.
Logan Jenkins
The IF itself actually has only indirect influence on power consumption. The MCM approach allows for better binning. It might be a bit more power efficient than intels mesh, but that's talking out of my ass.
The power saving features and process are responsible for zen being so efficient. They got their power saving features on track while saving what could be saved on bulldozer, and the process itself helps too. While it has somewhat of a hard wall at 4GHz, the sweetspot is also relatively high and the CPUs always operate close to it
Jeremiah Myers
don't forget
Jonathan Cruz
Hoo boy, that gave me a chuckle
Wyatt Evans
SEGMENTATION FAULT
Juan Bailey
UMA
Grayson James
DELICIA
John Peterson
phoronix.com
>As a result of feedback, currently working on some updated results. As some have pointed out, the conftest segmentation faults aren't specific to Ryzen, so updating the tests to avoid confusion.
Asher Clark
...
Oliver Wright
EXCLUA ISSO AGORA MESMO!
Jace Thompson
Hahaha! So funny laughing at Brazillians! SO FUNNY LOL!
Isaac Morris
S O P A M A C A C O
Anthony Diaz
Cool yourself you Hue cannibal glueater.
Parker Stewart
...