Why is every british colony a successful country but every spanish one is a cartel ridden shithole?
Why is every british colony a successful country but every spanish one is a cartel ridden shithole?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Chile has a lower homicide rate U.K.
>Every british colony
Its bait, go away plumber
Because your premise is incorrect
Fuck you
DELETE
good get
Britain was interested in the new world, Spain and Moortugal just took all the gold back to Europe.
AFRICA
Fuck this country, I had my phone stolen from a Taxi driver. I hate being Latino, every one of us is shit tier. Nuke us please, or let Islam take over. White USA is way better, fuck the Spics & Niggers there also.
>tfw you will never be a french colony
Nice proxy Pajeet
>every
the Southern Cone is not as bad, dumb pole
Sure, Britain was interested in the exceptional countries of Somalia, Sudan, Zimbabwe and Nigeria.
Can't forget about India either. That gem.
Defenitly all countries better than Argentina and Chile.
At least in America they were interested, Canada, Australia.
Spanairds mixed with tbe locals, Brits killed, concentrated, reeducated, or relocated the quarrelsome natives.
Spainards mixed cultures together, hence the weird forms of Catholicism we sometimes find in south and central America blended with pre-Columbian religious practices, or adoption of hybrid architecture etc. Brits just rebuilt British towns and churches in the New World.
Chile likes the UK.
yes
Delet this.
We are the great mata piratas.
Sure m8, just forget British west Indies, those monsters of progress.
It has nothing to do with the dedication of Britain to their colonies, it had to do with the ammount of white people.
Spanish repurposed the natives, Portugal injected niggers while Britain genocided everyone and replaced them with white people.
In a sense, you're right. Brazil would be a better place if it was colonised by the UK because Brazilians as we know them today wouldn't even exist.
BEcause spain.
>Being this ignorant
>It has nothing to do with the dedication of Britain to their colonies.
>It had to do with the ammount of white people.
And I'm the ignorant one?
you guys did good. i cant complaint about the way stuff happened. Brazil will get out of the mud in 20 or 30 years.
>imitate anglos
>do well
really makes u think
Why do Brazilians hate Portugal? It's not Alberto's fault your country is shit. Portugal were actually fairly gracious colonial overlords.
You fucked it up when you abandoned your last emperor, Pedro II
You are pretty much.
...
I don't hate portugal, they just fucked up by bringing 5 million negros here.
this
conquistador genes desu
Youre missing some for portugal
>Can't forget about India either. That gem.
*The Jewel in the crown of the British Empire
WTF I love Spain now!
>Can't forget about India either. That gem.
India was a pretty big deal back then. Literally jewels, spices, textiles, all the good shit.
Jamaica and Belize are shitholes below the Latin American average.
india only turned to shit when we left
French colonies didn't work out very well did they
Well there was a small bit about famines and that, but still.
Most of the British Carribbean other than Jamaica is above average though - Bahamas, Barbados, Grenada, etc. are better than Honduras, Dominican Republic, El Salvador....
>small bit
Superior Protestant work ethic. Lazy papists don't do any work
Yeah it's called sarcasm, well done for greentexting it.
I know that feel bro
Ayy i have that webm any backstory
damn it i've been trying to get 3 7's all month
fuck you thief!
Yeah, get back to
some cholo fucked some vato's latina gf and knocked her up
then he didnt want to take care of her kid
shit happens all the time
dawg
Why are french colonies so shit?
As you can see all of them have high or very high HDIs. The top 5 are/were all british
The spanish had no interest in settling in the new world, they just wanted to get rich quick. British colonies had settlers and set up colonial governments early on giving them a chance to be civilized.