If CP is immoral because it finances the production of CP, then pirating CP must be morally permissible

If CP is immoral because it finances the production of CP, then pirating CP must be morally permissible.

Right?

You can't pirate something that was never released. It's like getting in trouble for buying rice.

Piracy actually promotes the financing of the product, because it raises awareness for the product, and thus the demand, which in turn pushes more people to spend money on it.

Also, discussion of your topic is against the global rules of this website.

Piracy has been shown to increase sales though. Enjoy your time in prison, OP

I assume you are talking about Carrot Pie?

I agree that suck a thing is immoral.

So discussing piracy is against the rule of the site?

Secure tripcodes are for jerks.

Yes, discussing piracy is against that rule. Discussing a crime in the media is also against the rule. It's a very vaguely worded rule

IMO CP is fundamentally immoral; paying for it is much worse but not paying doesn't get you off the hook.

based on feels?

>t.pedo looking for confirmations

No, because then you break the copyright laws. Making it hard for the original creator to make a profit off it.

yes as long as you seed to ≥2.0

That's hilarious. There is a whole board dedicated to torrenting yet discussing piracy is against the rule

All morals are based on feels.

That's not true. Certain morals can be logically deduced to self-interest.

Not all shared content via p2p services falls under pirating.

Depends on if the download was recorded or not.

Downloading CP where somewhere or something knows you downloaded it means that it was recorded as being "in demand".

If there are 100 seeders or leachers then 100 people are wanting it or wanting to give it away. It encourages people to make more CP aka it encourages the abuse of children.

I believe purchasing of searching for cp is bad and encourages child abuse. But if the information is there and can be downloaded easily, such as the way it used to be linked in the hidden wiki, I do not believe that encourages child abuse.

Realistically, the abuse of a few children in order to produce child porn so that thousands of millions of others can jerk to it and not abuse children is better than all of the pedophiles not having access to a forbidden fetish and going out on their own to abuse children.

Does that make sense? I rambled. I'm in a coffee shop waiting to go for a bike ride

Illegal content is illegal

Self-interest is also a feel, called selfishness.

>not discuss anything that violates US law
>can't talk about murder or any crime