Why do people use AMD when their products clearly are inferior to Intel and Nvidia?

Why do people use AMD when their products clearly are inferior to Intel and Nvidia?

emotional investment

>clearly
must be conspiracy

(((you)))

Nonsense.
Just wait for Vega.
And by that, I mean drivers enabling next generation geometry.

Because they make you money. Vega 64 has like 40 MH/s rate right now. A gtx 1080 has like 25 lmao.

>next generation geometry

what

>i wonder who could be behind this post

> comparing to a CPU that came out in 2014

Why do Intel shills always try to shoehorn themselves into nvidia's constant success even after Nvidia snubbed them? Intel is dead

I have a 290 X, but in 2013/2014 the competition as tight enough to actually justify buying AMD.

>what goyim you want only the gpu for $500
>vega is now just $600 with 2 (((FREE))) games
>what a steal goyim

Uma

>AMD has only one division

a 480 also has 25 MHs.

The tranny CEO has the final say on all matters regarding pricing and sales.

Because it's open source. If you want your data to be sold by Nvidiots and Shintels be my guest.

Someone change this image, nvidia teamed up with AMD so now AMD should be Anakin.

>Because it's open source.
amdfag still living in the past I see
not true for both ryzen and vega

price

>ryzen
>inferior
>for USD100

tell that to my Nvidia graphics card where the DisplayPort is dead.

don't insult mama Lisa you fucking kike. It's not AMD's fault that Intel has condensed the holocaust in sgylag egs.

Try using a real operating system like Mac or Windows instead of the shitty hobby project called Linux.

Someone photoshop this plz

That's obi wan.
>and those two at the top get killed eventually

so does the guy at the bottom

woops misread that post.

>new competitor approaches

To be honest this has to happen.

>mama Lisa
back to /r/amd retard

back to /o/ven you kike

He comes back

only to die again

>unironically being emotionally invested with some ceo or company
consider suicide

More bang for the buck. At least that's my motivation. If you don't intend to buy the most high end hardware AMD will usually offer better performance/dollar. And also higher power consumption but that's another story

>unironically defending kikes
don't consider suicide, just do it now.

to spite you.
yes, specifically you OP.
just to make you angry.

I have been you twat. It's not the cable, either. HDMI works just fine.

>defending kikes
projection much?

>higher power consumption but that's another story
Not really. It might be cheaper for the hardware but more expensive in the long run due to the power consumption adding more to your electricity bill.

Isn't it ambiguous after Palpatine shocks him

Really? Odd, my R5 1600 has a lower TDP than an i5 6700K. So I'm paying less, for more performance, and using less electricity.

from 2014 and is still 650$+ in US, lol yeah thanks for proving my point

Because they aren't.

[citation needed]

Everyone loves an underdog story.