480 fps

But why?

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com/r/GlobalOffensive/comments/3oyilo/if_300_fps_is_better_than_144_fps_on_a_144hz/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

It isn't even useful for anything

Military and scientific purposes, maybe? It probably feels real good to play vidya on, too.

anything more than 144hz/fps is a waste

You won't need any version of adaptive sync?

It would be amazing for 3d single player games, since low server ticks make high fps multiplayer worthless.

So this panel tech will be the stuff in version 2 vr headsets. One panel, 480 hz, which is 240hz for each eye.

good luck getting that framerate in a game to match the sync rate

...

>anything below 4 ghz

porn. gotta see that jizz flying off, every frame counts.

It would be hard since most/all gpus won't output more than 240fps.

333fps or go home casual

The human eye can't see more than 1 fps. Is there anything faster than 1 second? Didn't think so. How can more than 1 "thing" happen per second. You can only see 1 second per second. Checkmate Republicans.

>most/all gpus won't output more than 240fps.
Where the fuck are you getting this laughable claim from?

This is false.
Same GPUs start to whine due to ridiculous high FPS (think 1000s) when a dev fucks up and forgets to FPS cap the menus for instance.

Human eye can only see 60hz, no bait

source; my ass

Check your gpu specs you dumb faggot.

Checked. There is no mention of a max framerate because there is none, you fucking retard. Show me a GPU that has a hardware cap for 240 fps.

what gpu do you have?

He is right, there's no video output that supports 1000fps on GPUs, you're right though that the GPU can be processing 1000fps even if it can't output that

took this sceenshot just for (you)

>Human eye can only see 60hz, no bait

You can't apply a fixed hz cap on the human eye since it is an analog system.

It's just a matter of bandwidth, isn't it? DP 1.3 can deliver 4k at 120Hz, so it ought to be able to deliver 1080p at 480Hz.

>technological progress is bad because i don't need it

>880hz
Get on my level normies

This. A gpu can process over 1000fps , but it won't output more than 240hz.

>Checked
And you skipped the part that it can only output at 240hz?

the AVERAGE human can only see 30hz per eyeball.
high performance athletes can see up to 60hz per eyeball

Literally stupid as fuck. You really think your gpu is pushing 1194 fps out of your dvi/hdmi/display port?

R9 390x

has disproved your erroneous claim.

see You're fucking dense because there's no such limit. It's a matter of bandwidth on the display protocol used. It can easy output 360p2000fps on DP1.2.

Yea man you're just stupid.

At 600p? Sure faggot

At any resolution.

halo product, whoever made this is flexing like a mad bitch so plebs will buy their other garbage

They did a test with a pilot and proved that he can see above 300fps

And your numbers are fucking wrong btw

Haha you took the bait

Yet to see a claim of a limited GPU.

I was right, you were wrong. You can stop the disinfo, OP.

This person posts on Sup Forums.

this thread and board is cancer. the fastest monitor in existence, does 4k@120hz, and Sup Forums finds a way to bitch about issues that aren't even real because they are ignorant about technology.

I guess if you're 15 and a poorfag you gotta find an excuse not to purchase something to make yourself feel better

anything above 144hz is pointless. there's already 240hz monitors out, but you're not gonna notice a difference

This
all visual tech is spearheaded by porn

There's been 300hz, and 666hz monitors out for decades. why is 480hz impressive?

I don't see much of a purpose to having more than 240hz monitors.

As a daily user of a 144hz monitor, I've never felt that I needed more. The jump from 60 to 144 is like whiplash inducing in itself. But I don't think that packing in 100 more fps would result in any major advantage

I just think the 480hz is useless, I mean some games are soft capped at 300fps like overwatch and csgo(I'm pretty sure it is) or like CS1.6, 100fps is the max

Agreed

...

Anything over 60hz is a waste. The human eye cannot see faster than 60fps.

good meme
checked btw

...

>Blown the fuck over one post
Did you just find out why your gpu can't output more than 240fps?

This is false.

Anything more than 60Hz is a waste for adults that don't play kiddie gaymes.

CS:GO meme players

>Not an engineer.

Wrong. Just the general smoothness in everything is so much better.

It's arguable whether it's worth it right now, but if the "gamer" standard becomes 480Hz and most affordable monitors start packing at least 120Hz then everyone definitely wins.

I know its a shitpost, but just pointing out, 14 frames per second is what the human brain needs to perceive motion, that said, tests have shown people to be perceptible to even 1000fps framerates.

t. Ubisoft PR

Still no proof, only retardation and disinformation from your side.

Give me one source, one GPU spec, that says the GPU, not the monitor, not the protocol, is framerate capped. You didn't, you can't and you won't.

t. Nintendont Switch owner

The proof is in the specs young one.

Isn't 24FPS required for smooth motion? Otherwise the choice of framerate in the film industry seems rather arbitrary and unnecessary (since less frames = less data, less work, cheaper equipment, etc.)

He explicitly said
>name one GPU spec

"The spec lol" is not a valid answer to that

>24
>smooth
Only because your brain is accustomed to watching movies.

Yet you can't show it or point to it, because the claim is false.

Go to collage. Get a degree in electronic engineering, read specs, and pretend that you weren't the guy who was being an actual retard on Sup Forums.

It's not 480 frames per second, it's Herz which means how many time it refreshes in a minute (gray to gray), quite impressive considering human eye cant see over 21fps.

Wrong.

If you don't know from reading the specs then Sup Forums isn't the board for you.

>if you don't know from reading the specs
What makes you say that? You haven't even provided the specs for me to read.

Do that then try again

False.

It's obviously not good enough for things like games, in fact including gameplay footage because
>no motion blur
>jerky movements that happen so fast that adjacent frames are different enough not to be perceived as smooth motion
But given a sequence of frames that follow each other fluidly, 24fps is very much good enough. (When was the last time you noticed the individual frames in a movie?)

People have said
and
And for tis guy.
>DP 1.3 can deliver 4k at 120Hz, so it ought to be able to deliver 1080p at 480Hz.
DP 1.3 delivers 1080p, and 1440p at 240hz max.

TROLLED HARD

Nope, like said, everything becomes smoother with more hz, it doesn't just benefit gaymers

Your claim was the GPU couldn't deliver. Which it can.

The trolls are the people who are suggesting that they can output over 240 frames with current hardware.

>DP 1.3 delivers 1080p, and 1440p at 240hz max.
If it has the bandwidth to deliver 120hz at 4k, it has the bandwidth to deliver 480hz at 1080p. The rest is just software.

A gpu can not output more than it's physically capable to user, sorry for your ignorance. It must have been hard for you.

>DP 1.3 delivers 1080p, and 1440p at 240hz max.
Is this supposed to be a counter argument? Because the ability for 1440p at 240Hz only supports the claim to 1080p at 480Hz

>no proofs

Stay in "collage".

>hurr the only limiting factor is it's limiting factor.

>wants proof.
serious?

Pray tell, which part of the protocol is the one that stops it from delivering more than 240hz?

Sure, though I already know you have none. And I will only get an evading, non-reply to this.

How about it's actual specifications you moran?
Are there any gpu manufactureres who implemented an extention to current specifications for anything? Does nu/g/ need this much spoon feeding?

Still waiting for proofs.

was right

>How about it's actual specifications you moran?
So there isn't any actual reason it couldn't do that, in other words. The specifications are just the limit of what it's designed to do, not the limit of what it can do. And as it happens, the specifications say it has enough bandwidth to deliver 1080p video at 480Hz.

reddit.com/r/GlobalOffensive/comments/3oyilo/if_300_fps_is_better_than_144_fps_on_a_144hz/

Have a thread about people rendering CSGO at 300FPS faggot

...

Oldfags always act like muh sicrit club bsdfagtier muh fuck spoon feeding homos.
Please just post something instead of baiting for the sake of chat flow.

Yes

OS itself becomes a hindrance at such frame rates, any timer below 5ms is unreliable on desktop OS.

This shows the bandwidth limitations of DP versions, not that "GPUs are limited to 240 fps". Which is a lie BTW.

But he's right. GPUs don't have fps limits or whatever you are trying to claim lmfao.

What port do you use that's better than display port?

I don't see a line for 480Hz saying "no"

It must be yes then.

you can use displayport 1.2 to output 8.000FPS at a really low res if you like. Your GPU does not limit the framerate. We have been over this.

Just say it to me: "I was wrong, you were right. Sorry for calling you a retard."

Different user here (I only posted the screenshot), but it seems like you were in the wrong.

If you like I can say that you were in the right, but then we would both be wrong.

>Still no proof.