>Download Windows 7, 8, or 10 iso
>install
>30 days pass
>"Windows is not activated"
>Consequences: fucking nothing
You lose the ability to change your wallpaper or theme, and you can't get drivers through Windows update. That's it. The core of the OS remains completely functional.
Any time someone tells you windows costs money you can tell them they are full of shit.
Other urls found in this thread:
onhax.me
twitter.com
windows has been free since win8
>he can't spend $5 on a Windows key
>he can't spend $0 and install Linux
this is what I do on my macbook
activating windows is a meme
if you don't use it as your main OS why do you need to change the wallpaper
They gave me a free Windows 10 key with my laptop and they stored it in the BIOS
lolxDDDDDD
>Not downloading Windows 7/8.1, use Kill MySelf, then accessibility upgrade to Windows 10, before wiping the install with a clean copy
>faggots in this thread are talking about paying money for Windows
>paying for Windows
>ever
Holy shit! This is the current state of Sup Forums
>not being a uni student and getting it legitimately for free
Too bad windows costs next to nothing compared to my tuition...
Watermark?
>He thinks they didn't just add the windows cost into the tuition
>using Microsoft dream-spark and not knowing it expires.
Enjoy your community college.
Windows is only free if you think your personal integrity is worthless.
>Implying Microsoft themselves doesn't have worthless integrity
KEK
this applies to all free products/services by the way
Stealing from thieves doesn't keep you from being a thief yourself, user.
If someone holding immense power is a thief, that only sends a message that being a thief is fine. Hence, why not.
Deciding that your usage data is a fair trade for a product or service is not the same as deciding that anything you can pilfer should have been better secured, user.
>Hence, why not.
If one's own integrity is worthless, nothing.
Typical. Next time don't make brash statements and upon realizing it also applies to you and your habits, make excuses for them.
Everyone have worthless integrity. There is no way out of this. If you buy Windows, you simply support coporate tyranny and monopoly, and by extenstion you lack integrity. Those who claim to have that are just blatant liars.
>You don't pay for Winblows
>M$ makes the money out of your private information
Also happens if you pay them...
a FREE botnet? Sign me up OP!
Based on your posts, you value your personal integrity far lower than I, while valuing your privacy more highly.
You are lying, and by extension, a liar who doesn't have integrity.
As intended since more people using Windows --> good for MS. Now if you're a business, prepare to be berried.
>Everyone have worthless integrity.
Incorrect. The person who eschews Windows to use free alternatives has more integrity than the person who liberates a copy of Windows. That decision makes me more inclined to employ them, in fact, which would raise their worth, in my estimation.
>You are lying,
Not at all. The few Windows installs I have are all legit. Mind you, I only run Windows when people are paying me to run Windows, so the cost is something I pass on to others.
CIA NIGGERS
(you)
A lot of loyalty.
Not an arGNUment
MORE CIA NIGGERS
>Download Windows 7
>install
>Crack it
>Update to win10 (you can download it cause Microsoft have a program for disabled people, literally it's free forever)
>Get an license win10 for free
Later:
>Reinstall win10 (if you worrying about cracking)
>Enter into Microsoft.com account
>License attached to your account
Better system ever
Incorrect? You are so full of yourself, as shown in this post , babbling holier-than-you gobbledegook. As I said, there is ALWAYS a reason to accuse someone of having no integrity. I can argue that people who use Linux supports communism, instead of meritocracy, and hence have no integrity. Ranking them off with your own arbitrary conditions only reinforces the fact that you are just a narcissitic scum, which in itself is a sign of someone with little to no integrity.
Mind you, Microsoft provides students some versions of Windows absolutely free. By your comment , it can be implied that students who leverage this method to obtain free Windows lack integrity. There are also groups of people who encounters activation errors with their legitimate key due to a problem on Microsoft's side, and if they use tools to circumvent activation, they also lack integrity by your definition. Basically, you are a delusional egotist that claims to be in a better moral state than others, when in fact, you are just as bad, or in fact worse.
Finally, passing costs onto others is also not a very nice thing to do. Are you sure you have integrity?
>shilling against the premier botnet OS
>must be CIA
Seems good to me.
>The core of the OS remains completely functional.
Of course it does. Are you surprised that if you decide not to pay for Windows 10 it will stop spying on you?
>Microsoft provides students some versions of Windows absolutely free.
That is Microsoft's choice, not the students. It has no bearing on the students integrity at all.
>There are also groups of people who encounters activation errors with their legitimate key due to a problem on Microsoft's side, and if they use tools to circumvent activation,
Before or after they contact Microsoft to straighten things out?
>Finally, passing costs onto others is also not a very nice thing to do.
That is literally business. If a client insists that I run a particular set of tools for their project, they pay for them.
>Are you sure you have integrity?
Only on the issue of paid operating systems, which is all that's germane to this thread.
If you're not paying, you're the products.
A different point, I think, than the one we're working on here.
On the subject of keys:
>Install Enterprise win 10
>Try to use education win 10 key
>Accepts key and prompts me to upgrade
I thought Enterprise was the top of the line?
Kinguin keys are like 20 bucks, are you that poor?
top of the line is server datacentre and MS are practically giving it away for free to students via dreamspark
>not downloading MS toolkit and activating windows with a click of a button
kek you faggots are something else
MS gives away all their shit for free to students (for 1 or 2 years, theres a time limit) cuz they want to keep the young generation indoctrinated with MS bs
just use kms activators u dumb fucking spastic
yeah I admin some 30 workstations at work. Do you mean I can just install windows on our PCs for free and get off scot free?
i guess not, as windows is not free
and we run stuff on server grade hardware so we dont generally shut down anything, ever, so that fucking watermark...
luckily I only run linux in my household so I don't have to worry about windows licencing
Where does one acquire an LTSB key for free?
90 day trail with
slmgr -rearm
And Linux is only free if your time is worthless.
You cannot make money running windows unless you have a Windows Professional License.
>I can argue that people who use Linux supports communism, instead of meritocracy
Hey, american friend, you shouldn't really talk about communism, it's idea has been warped in your minds to make it a scapegoat. And no, I don't think it has happened to me the other way around since my nation is pretty much the only case of a NATO, fascist nation where the culture (books, films etc) were communist. And remember, while fascism is something that can actually happen, communism has never been in any country's political system. You can argue about whether you're talking about communism, socialism, marxism or whatever, but they're all utopies, not plans for the future (they were, but USSR changed that). So, for example, Marxism and IIRC communism are pro-meritocracy. Marx was a high-merit person in a meritocracy, since he studied a lot of history, economics and so on, so he wouldn't have been privileged in a socialist country where everyone got paid the same and the only jobs considered 'good' were the manual ones he couldn't do.
BTW I'm just guessing you're from the USA since it's the country where this type of error is the most frequent.
You people are intolerable
>he thinks integrity can be categorized by a topic, and not present or absent as a whole