Best Up and Coming Youtube Alternative

Let's face it, Youtube's on the way out. Where will the mass exodus migrate to?

Other urls found in this thread:

vid.me/
vidlii.com/
dtube.video/
steemit.com/dtube/@heimindanger/dtube-0-2-faster-to-serve-videos-stronger-to-resist-censorship
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

ebaumsworld.com

>on the way out
>implying anyone else is willing to lose money as a charity

>Let's face it, Youtube's on the way out.
No it's not.

>Where will the mass exodus migrate to?
Nowhere because noone else wants to or is even able to throw millions of dollars a year into the money sink that is a video sharing website. You might have little sites cropping up here and there, but there will never be any sort of "mass exodus" unless you can get some eccentric billionaire to throw his money away on an alternative.

YouTube is such a massive site, popular with so many retarded conformists, it's really hard to say.

inB4 amazon makes yt competitor

Minds.com replaces: Twitter, Facebook, Patreon, YouTube, etc.

And it respects your freedom of speech with a passion. As well as your privacy and security.

Honestly, everyone should just abandon everything else in favor of it.

>Minds.com
Read the tos compared to bitchute and vidme, they won me over. I will now champion minds as I gathered from their tos, they are the true absolute freedom of speech/expression platform.

Minds are run by snowflake cucks

they banned hentai translation groups because they hurt some roasties feelings.

>implying anyone else is willing to lose money as a charity
agreed. the only plausible alternative is sites like BitChute who offload bandwidth using P2P.

Did they actually ?

Was it direct harassment or something deemed offensive, I genuinely want a freedom of speech/expression platform to champion.

I want to someone to steal bitchute code and overhead design. Then apply purer freedom of speech/expression, their tos reads as the MUH MORALITY poltards.

>their tos reads as the MUH MORALITY poltards.
Well their actions read that they don't seem to give a fuck. If you want absolute freedom of speech and expression then use ZeroNet through Tor.

They say that now, but let's be honest any sense if ideals ends when it becomes either inconvenient or politically painful. If you'll recall Googles slogan was once "Don't be Evil" for alot of people that's got to be said when a tone of sarcastic irony

Ehhhhh, my gripe is that if I can't create a murdoch murdoch, south park or blazing saddles on the platform according to tos. I can't view it as a pure freedom of speech/expression platform.

My gripe with zeronet, I can't say I see the mass adoption happening, which would make it not worth taking on the platform. I would love to be wrong on that, but it takes additional work by your average person and then it sounds dark/risky to them.

Good thing they plan to decentralize and shit as well then.

>can't create a murdoch murdoch, south park or blazing saddles on the platform according to tos
How so? The most worrying part of their TOS to me is:
>We may terminate your access to and use of the Service at our sole discretion, at any time and without notice to you.
Which I think just about any website nowadays will say this. It isn't ideal, but if the creators of BitChute start being really tyrannical we can just move elsewhere, as their P2P model enables on a low budget. Till then BitChute is pretty nice, I like it. They just need to improve the interface and video player.

>My gripe with zeronet, I can't say I see the mass adoption happening, which would make it not worth taking on the platform.
The main thing I don't like about it is how it seems to host an entire site's data on your machine for anyone to download. If I'm on ZeroNet Sup Forums and someone posts MLP child porn on the neighboring board I don't want to host it unknowingly, or at all. That's a big advantage centralized servers have.

about 6 months back weebs flocked there because twitter can be a bit finicky at times

a few big sadpanda translation groups migrated, some even donating to minds themselves. Then some christfag feminist reported their H-translations to a Minds dev (justified it with some vague feeling of needing to protect the image of cartoon females and chillians).

the next morning later he holocausted pretty much every account even remotely involved with H-translations, even those that donated shekels. No discussions nothing, just a big fat b& notice.

>promoting or glorifying violence will not be tolerated.
>Content containing or promoting pornography will not be tolerated.
>Showing respect and decency towards fellow members of the community and others is required.

It reads as MUH MORALITY to me and it's the other spectrum of sjw's. I want things to be absolute and not what simply appeals to you. Old youtube was pretty good in hindsight, where looking back now, they allowed some pretty controversial stuff to at least stay on the site.

Death to white knight beta orbiters, who prioritize females they don't even fucking know over core principles.

They've been quite clear about how their model won't allow them to cave in to pressure, and they seem to genuinely care about this.

Google was funded by the CIA. "Don't be evil" was always a bad joke. Really bad example.

>promoting or glorifying violence will not be tolerated.
Ah. I honestly don't think that they are going to get on your ass about some cartoon violence, but maybe I am wrong. I think it's fair for them not to want gore compilations on their site. There's other places if that's what you want
>Content containing or promoting pornography will not be tolerated.
I don't think that's even based in morality. BitChute isn't a porn website, just put it up on pornhub. I'm glad they have this in there, when I want porn I go to pornhub when I want media I go to BitChute.
>Showing respect and decency towards fellow members of the community and others is required.
Yeah true they could get Nazish on interpreting that one. But I haven't seen them do anything unreasonable yet and it still seems like the best most viable YouTube alternative. I think BitChute going full 1984 is far in the future and by then there will be alternatives to it. For now it itself is still a YouTube alternative in its infancy.

>minds.com
>minds
Yeah I'm sure this isn't a psyop

MediaGoblin.

You combine those rules, you deduct you can't create a murdoch murdoch, south park or blazing saddles. Which has a mixture of every element listed in the tos.

Minds had the better tos laid out and what i would look for in a freedom of speech/expression platform. But it deeply saddens me it's just meaningless words to them and they wouldn't die for freedom of speech.

Another gripe with the promoting porn part, so you're telling me as a content creator I can't create a list of pornstars ? I can't mock porn stars? I can't joke about porn and promote grotesque degenerate nonsense in satirical fashion? It just screams, I support freedom of speech when it appeals to me. But, MUH MORALITY.

>Another gripe with the promoting porn part,
Oh shit I didn't see that actually. I missed the 'promoting porn will not be tolerated' part hahaha. That does almost sound like the creators are Christians who want to be anal about it or something.

Well, still probably better than YouTube. You're right they're definitely not ideal, but I love their P2P model. Someone will probably make a clone if they start being nazis about enforcing their ToS.

As I said, I take my tos reading seriously to understand who they are before undertaking championing a platform.

And yeah I agree, I love their model and want it in different hands for their p2p model.

>And yeah I agree, I love their model and want it in different hands for their p2p model.
It's pretty interesting though, there's the issue that content creators can't seed their videos, otherwise they would expose their IP to subscribers or worse. So I guess it is uploaded to BitChute's servers first, and mirrored onto other seedboxes of BitChute in other locations or from donors to help the site. People might help them out at first, but sooner or later BitChute is going to have to foot the whole cost of storage and bandwidth in one way or another. Unless they become super free speech and don't even use ads or anything.

So that means that it would only really save bandwidth if multiple people were watching a video at once & seeding each other thru WebTorrent, thus only marginally helping with bandwidth costs.

When I first heard about it, I envisioned that it would be something like you can choose to seed videos of content creators that you like and want to support. Having it fully hosted like that instead of seedboxes like they currently have would make overhead pretty much zero.

Vidme is the prime up-and-coming alternative. Many YouTube creators have migrated there and are uploading content to the site as we speak.

vid.me/

Obvious vidme shill, read the thread, vidme has been confirmed youtube lite who will eventually ramp up to their level if allowed to reach that point.

Vidme is not pure freedom of speech/expression, which is what many of are fighting for.

We just saw a self-proclaimed "free speech" website (Pewtube) take down videos related to communism. Where does free speech begin and end?

Vidme is anti-free speech SJWs. They are just another smaller version of Youtube.

Also, their business model is fucking shit

Read the thread, we concluded there is no platform that is absolute yet. The closest is bitchute, but they seem like moralists who only like it when applied to them as well.

I also read the pewtube twitter, combining that with his marketing, branding, revenue generation. He wasn't a bright person, nor destined for tech greatness. Ignore and cross out pewtube, he fell for a very weak bait, even showed his hand when fell for the bait. He just got darwin'd. As a reader of tos, minds was the most pure tos that has risen, but it was brought to my attention that it has infringed their beliefs, over a random person to white knight for. The best route is to follow the bitchute p2p model where some of the server costs is mitigated, then have a free market advertising system, where it's at the discrepancy of the adverser if they want to place an ad on certain videos. While always vowing to remain creator first and never bending at the knee for advertiser standards.

Don't fix it if it ain't broke

Youtube is broken, very broken, care to elaborate on your comment?

I want bitchute to grow.

>it was brought to my attention that it has infringed their beliefs, over a random person to white knight for
Source?

You sure on that?

see
Bitchute is opposite spectrum sjw, poltard moralists, who don't actually hold the freedom of speech/expression.

>MLP child porn
Like what, a kid in a pony costume?

newpipe, you can get it on f-droid and isnt that bad

this
I agree isn't concrete and take it at will, but it sounds like a believable story to me.

user if still here who posted that, please post evidence or else we are forced to dig.

>Like what, a kid in a pony costume?
Idk what you ponyfags like. But I don't want to host illegal shit on my computer. Especially if I never even see the thing being hosted.

Maybe it's just regular loli stuff since normalfags think loli is CP

If you've never seen it you aren't legally responsible for it. That's why TOR exit nodes don't get arrested and freenet users aren't arrested instantly.

That's why I asked.

We aren't forced to dig. Without evidence we can just dismiss it.

What about hooktube?

>If you've never seen it you aren't legally responsible for it.
I am not going to count on that holding up in court. It's one thing to host an exit node ( proxy ) but it's another to seed a torrent containing illegal content.

That isn't the only issue with ZeroNet though, if you don't connect through a VPN or Tor all your fellow chan users can see your IP. Tor I trust but is still too slow for everyday use.

I always thought Vimeo was the only website that had a chance to surpass YouTube. Their player and interface are better than YouTube, and you can even make money off the platform.

I'm really surprised people are suggesting these no name alternatives like BitChute when Vimeo has been around since the days of Google Video.

what if content creators used siacoins?
and viewers could donate so the creator has more space available to host

t. sia bagholder

Read the vimeo tos, they aren't any better and sjw.

>Contains hateful, defamatory, or discriminatory content or incites hatred against any individual or group;

>Videos that offer seduction training or teach Pickup Artist (PUA) techniques

>videos need to be respectful and not cross the line that separates criticism from abuse.

Another site that claims to know where to draw the line on right from wrong and wants to dictate morality.

Is there a way to make it so that if I ever just click a youtube link or embed it will just open up to hooktube instead?

Yeah, there's a search feature now. Don't even need to visit youtube and it uses a proxy so youtube won't know it was you. Check the bottom of the page for updates.

Migrate to ashemaletube to upload videos.

i personally use the hookjew

Well, that explains that.

I dislike Pick Up Artist crap as much as the next guy, but banning it?

vidlii.com/
It's literately just a copy of early youtube.

I think you're unaware of just how little people give a shit about Youtube demonetizing select videos outside of le fedora tipping skeptik xd meme community

inb4 they host it on the amazon.com domain buried in the menus so nobody can reliably find it when they want it.

Vid.me hasn't censored MY hatespeech...

>I always thought Vimeo was the only website that had a chance to surpass YouTube.
They have absolutely no desire to. They don't want Youtube's sort of content on their site.

using it with some rss agregator is flawless. No google account and you can still follow channels.

Someone should edit that and add minds

Uhm... You all realize that Twitch has an upload MP4 function now right?

>Youpoop bankrupt and finished

YouTube will not be replaced, it will dissipate. More social platforms are supporting video, so the killer feature that YouTube once had (hosting video) is soon becoming irrelevant.

>But monetisation!

Well, content monetisation is becoming more nuanced and complex. YouTube is clearly failing a lot of producers, their one-size-hardly-fits-all model of monetisation isn't working. There is instead growing interest in patron-funded content, content designed to drive traffic to websites, etc.

>Youtube doesn't make money
>Ads are pulling off, better make rules more strict
This two, don't add up

minds.com is fucking garbage full of unblockable spam.

>unblockable
Why are you lying?

Depends on how you look at it. Youtube in itself doesnt generate enough money to stay above 1:1, but the amount of product placement and reputation google does for their other products certainly generates enough revenue to make up for it. Plus they can pretty much control the masses by promoting certain creators whose views align with that of google without even informing those creators.

Surprised no one gave OP the only answer already
dtube.video/

steemit.com/dtube/@heimindanger/dtube-0-2-faster-to-serve-videos-stronger-to-resist-censorship

Because Steemit is a scam. More than 80% of the money is in the hands of 200 early adopters.

twitch isnt far from youtube, they censor content unless it benefits them and brings them more money like streamers that obviously break the rules but have a lot of subscribers, most of that money goes to twitch