Who would win if these two sides went to war with conventional weapons only (no nukes)?

Who would win if these two sides went to war with conventional weapons only (no nukes)?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentina–Brazil_relations
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Why do you ask?

Blue

those questions are fucking pointless if America is included

>send pacifist POO IN LOOs as cannon fodder to distract chinks and ruskies.

>bomb chink and ruskie industry and factories

>win war

FRANGLOSPHERE

if india was red then the numerical advantage would be laughable

russia + china would be invencible in a convencional war, desu.

also:
>win a war with frogs and spaghettis like allies.

lmao

>WE WUZ CONKWEESTADORES N SHIT

>if just this were the ww2 scenario

>Brazil allied to the US going to war against Argentina
no just no

Russia and China are so big to conquer both would be near impossible desu
neither of them have the naval strength to reach America so it would probably become a stalemate

>Who would win
The Hispanosphere.

Ah, excellent, let's take our rightful clay.

The Blue team also has the only three true blue-water navies and again has far superior naval dominance generally.

It also has 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 10, 11,13 ,as opposed to 2, 4, 12, 15 in terms of economy.

The Blue team has the 7 of the top 10 strongest militaries and the U.S. which is about two tiers above everyone else.

Pretty clear isn't it.

US would occupy European Russia before Putin even gets his pants up, eventually leading to a collapse of the Russian State.

China's fleet gets destroyed and navally blockaded.

Germany? hahaha

Pretty confident no one would.

US and UK would find a way to jew everyone and end up on top though.

If US could defeat Russia there would be no Russia

>US would occupy European Russia before Putin even gets his pants up

You are retarded.

Tell me how many forces we even have in Europe.

The U.S. can't do anything because of nukes but in scenario there are no nukes.

60 000

>mark balkans blue
blue wins
>mark balkans red
red wins

why?

>russia + china would be invencible in a convencional war, desu.
>what is chink navy

Dont even get me started on both of their air forces. It would be us invading them

>This

Aerial battles are keys in winning modern wars, if you do not control your own airspace, you're fucked. That means you can only supply by ground and you're bound to get fucked and sabotaged by airborne missions.


Blue wins as of now. Ask the same question 10 years later and the answer will be red.

What about this? No nukes

>what is a nuclear deterrent

Blue

China would win, JSDF can't do shit without big daddy US.

Blue

Blue
China is willing to do what America was not in Vietnam, India is shit, Japan can't take on China by itself

mongolia

I'm not sure they can stop all of them, remember, China is shit at wars

why not include the saudis

Far more likely to happen than we going AGAINST the United States.

>remember, China is shit at wars
When your enemies are shit, you don't have to be great

>mongols, Japs, Viets

Blues are fucked

You underestimate how much Vietnam hates China

The premise of the map is pointless and ludicrous. The USA alone could take on the other side.

...

Argentina and Brazil have been friends for over 100 years. We cooperate on countless things together. In fact, I don't think there is a closer relationship in Latin America.

>Today, the strategic relationship between Argentina and Brazil is considered to be "at the highest point in history".[4] Argentine foreign policy has given special emphasis in "deepening the strategic alliance with Brazil in all its aspects".[5] Likewise, Argentina has been "an absolute priority" for Brazilian foreign policy.[6]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentina–Brazil_relations

India and Nepal have Gurkhas.