Are we going to see another socialist revolution this century?

Are we going to see another socialist revolution this century?

What country?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kulak
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Lenin
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Trotsky
worldnewsdailyreport.com/denmark-new-documents-reveal-lenin-was-a-german-agent/
jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/Trotsky.html
notablebiographies.com/Ki-Lo/Lenin-Vladimir.html#ixzz4Eq1YWikA
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

None because the whole world saw its retarded

I have nothing, lets remove bourgeise private property and lets share our goods.

Turkey

>Marxist country
>has theft as law
Maximum bourgeois m8.

>socialist revolution
Oh no, not this shit again!

user, a socialist revolution is happening right now

And we're winning

Never, because now everyone knows it's shitty.

Maybe they'll keep Lenin in stasis a while longer, but that's as radical as anyone will get.

Lenin was the best russian leader. Fuck putin

We're headed toward luxury communism eventually, but capitalist automation -- not violent revolution -- will get us there.

Or the world will be brought back to the 14th century by Muslim fascists and European fascists. Who knows.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kulak

yeah m8 go and kill those fucking peasants lmao

Lenin literally ruined Russia.

Putin is shit too though.

What's the status of the MLKP?

Do you actually think the Turkish left has a shot?

now I know you're a Jew looking to destroy something, you've been completely beaten in this very thread.

Reminder that Lenin adopted capitalism in his last years and died before he could make Russia a prosperous state

>dog sees cat
>dog wants cats weak
>tells cats that the alpha cats are oppressing them
>cats go in class war
>dog eats cats

I'm neither a Jew nor looking to destroy anything. I want the working people of the world to be in control of their own destinies.

What don't you understand?

>Europe
>relevant

We're probably going to see a slow deteroriation of nation states and a greater use of regional hegemonies.

>I want the working people of the world to be in control of their own destinies.
Then enforce higher pay.

If a socialist revolution happen, the country will receive support from russia LOL

>Hohol faggot
Everytime

You don't believe thieves should be punished? Are you a liberal?

Only full-on tankies and autistic leftcoms believe that market socialism is capitalism.

>le "educated" communist bean
topkek

yes
world wide
its the only way

No u, proxy scum

Kulaks are fucking peasants you retarded commie.

What year do you think this is, 1999?

As neoliberalism crumbles, more and more people are drawn to non-liberal alternatives. Radical Islam has become incredibly powerful, socialism is once again a force in global politics, and nationalism of a kind not seen in half a century is erupting in the developed world.

Either people are serfs or "kulaks" there can only be one.

Nationalism doesn't erupt dumb Jew, it is nature.

>implying the EU itself is not a Socialist entity enforcing laws forcibly equalizing its member states and attempting to create a European monoculture by way of unchecked mass migration.

The Iron Curtain may have fallen, but the intellectuals and architects of the ideology simply abandoned ship, moderated slightly and changed the label of their mass mediocrity worship.

Easy way to bet is somewhere in South America doing a Venezuela
Longer odds but close is a military coup in the South Pacific characterising itself as a people's revolution, so say PNG or Fiji or Nauru
If they tried it on in Nauru it would be Australia's Granada.

Kulaks were the petty-bourgeoisie; prosperous farmers who became wealthy by exploiting poorer workers. They wanted to keep their status over their employees, even though their employees were suffering.

I don't think any Kulaks should have been killed, and Stalinism is obviously unforgivable, but Kulaks were wealthy to the detriment of their laborers. I feel some sympathy with them, only because rural Russian conditions were still essentially feudal. Exploitation was all that most of the Kulaks knew. They didn't see how their actions were hurting others.

I'm pretty sure that's not how dogs work.
Or capitalists, for that matter.

Kulaks were land owners, there's enough land to give every citizen in Russia land, yet they did not do this, instead they went and took the land from the peasants who had land which they worked generations to obtain.

Kill your self, you've proven yourself an enemy to all workers.

This, Lenin was a fanatic, who ruined Russian Empire. I think every party (workers, Bourgeoisie, peasants) in Russia could cooperate and figure something out. But no, bolsheviks siezed the power, when Russian new government were too weak, and turned their propoganda machine on. Then, a lot of bydlo became ideologised and Civil war started.

We could have waited for Uchereditelnoe Sobranie and establish a better government, which were alright for everybody.

What's the outcome? World revolution did not happen, a lot of people die from Civil war, Lenin literally devided our country for a century, communism never happend, and at the end USSR collapsed. Thank you very much grandpa Lenin.

At least Stalin did something for the country. But in his place might have been anybody, a Russian Premier-minister for example. Industrialisation and technological advance are no these things which come only with communism.

Nationalism is a modern phenomenon. It's a liberal innovation that didn't exist before the enlightenment.

Read Evola, he's far-right and will help you express your reactionary thoughts more intelligibly.

idiot, they were an average hard working peasants which had more money because they worked hard unlike those alcoholics.

>tribe wants other tribe dead
>says the other tribe doesn't exist
>tells the other tribe that their leaders are oppressing them and everyone should be a leader!
>tribe conquers the marginalized and individualized tribe

The EU is the most powerful capitalist institution in the history of the world

What do you think socialism is?

>by exploiting poorer workers.
another idiot.

i missed you a lot fag churka

Serf or Kulak, choose what you want to be.

You should stop digging downward

what, I'm not churka

But Kulaks were the wealthiest 5% of rural workers. I think forced collectivism in the Stalinist style is wrong, but I don't think the oppression of the Kulaks is worse than the centuries of oppression wrought upon serfs by Kulaks.

Kulaks were peasants you idiot, family farms and shit.

then a liberal fag haha

Are you retarded? Rich peasants weren't wealthier because they "oppressed others peasants". They were wealthier because they had huge families and everybody from their families worked hard. FUCKING PIECE OF AMERICAN DUMB SHIT STOP GETTING YOUR INFORMATION FROM JEWPEDIA!!!

I'm not a liberal fag either
I like Stalin kek, he was based
USSR was based
It's just Lenin, who turned our country (RE) into complete turmoil.

Why haven't any so called "socialist" states distributed all the land equally to all citizens?

A Kulak is, by definition, a rich peasant who exploits a poor peasant. The word is a Russian pejorative meaning "fist", to suggest how serfs lived under their thumb.

A Kulak is a land owner, a serf is a landless peasant.

Mensheviks should have won

Russian slaves hate lenin cuz he gave them freedom; the thing russians hate.

it was commie definition and it was false and a huge lie! Rich peasants didn't exploit anyone. Commies sent them to the Gulags because they needed cheap labour and they pop that "crime" our of their ass.

hopefully never

My family was repressed as kulaks and they owned nothing but flour mill!

what?

another bulgarian told me about people like you...for example that you could be part of the turkroach diaspora or a faggot

Socialism implies the rule of the proletariat which rose due to abusive mindless labour, the which was only possible due to the proletariat being in absolute majority.
>The western world is mainly middle class,
>The third world is either rising or too unstable to follow any kind of strict ideology
>Neomarxism is retarded

Not only them
It should have been a proper government, whith all the parties represented
But of course, bolsheviks didn't want that. There were only 5% of so bolsheviks in the parlament

Fanatic Lenin wanted a World Revolution, and he did basically coup d'etat. And then Civil war happened. Way to go, blyat'

My family was sent to the GULAG because they were considered kulaks and they owned a mill without any land. YOU FUCKING RETARDED PIECE OF SHIT

Ah, I read your "as" as by.

Yeah, Communism is simply taking all power away from people by design with fantasy philosophy.

I'm sorry Stalin confiscated your grandfather's farm, Anatoly

Are you seeing now proper goverment wihin all parties represented? I don't. I see the only party under several names. Revolution will come!

Kek I love this

The USA

"russian revolution" was not a revolution of poor people or even Russians for that matter.

we are too smart to cuck our rights away.

Actually, it was a revolution of poor people, who were decieved by bolsheviks' propaganda.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Lenin
Alma mater Leningrad State University
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Trotsky
Odessa University

both trotsky and lenin were filthy rich.

I don't care. I would prefer a foreign goverment to our thiefs and 'based strong fists'. Fuck putin, fuck stalin, fuck tsar.

The middle class is just a comfortable proletariat

Don't you dare taint Comrade Squidward with your reaction

Proofs. They didn't have a big castles and tons of money like putin has.

worldnewsdailyreport.com/denmark-new-documents-reveal-lenin-was-a-german-agent/

Jacob Schiff was head of the New York
investment firm Kuhn, Loeb and Co. He
was one of the principal backers of the
Bolshevik revolution and personally
financed Trotsky's trip from New York
to Russia. He was a major contributor
to Woodrow Wilson's presidential
campaign and an advocate for passage
of the Federal Reserve Act. (p. 210)

Which is why they won't rise. That would risk their comfort.

Most of these papers carry orders emerging from German ambassador Hans Freiherr von Wangenheim, and are destined to two Russian agents codenamed “der Bankier” (the banker) and “Maulwurf” (the mole), which have been identified respectively as Alexander Parvus and Vladimir Lenin. According to these documents, Parvus would have served as Lenin’s liaison officer, transmitting him the orders and the material that came from the Germans through Jakob Fürstenberg, Lenin’s most trusted agent who was also known by various aliases such as Hanecki, Kuba, or his Party name, Ganetsky.

Second him.
Actually it happens in Syrian Kurdistan right now and it happened in Nepal in 00s.

I think maybe USA or Turkey. Some African place.

Using term "revolution" lightly though. Perhaps just a major swing to the left by any sort of means.

yes

Several contemporary politicians had already alleged that Lenin worked for Germany, but without presenting any solid proof. Aleksandr Kerensky, Grigory Aleksinsky, and other Russian political opponents, had already accused the Bolsheviks, especially Lenin—of being Imperial German agents provocateurs, but presenting forged and inconclusive evidence. British prime minister Winston Churchill had also blamed the Germans for the the rise to power of the Bolsheviks, writing “They transported Lenin in a sealed truck like a plague bacillus from Switzerland into Russia“.

jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/Trotsky.html
I don't know if he was wealthy, but supposedly his family was. It's also (((Trotsky))) aka Lev Davidovich (((Bronstein))).

As for (((Lenin))) who was also ancestrally Jewish: notablebiographies.com/Ki-Lo/Lenin-Vladimir.html#ixzz4Eq1YWikA
>Because Lenin's father had risen into the ranks of the Russian nobility, Lenin grew up in fairly privileged circumstances.

CRINGE

We might be the ones... I may even support it. If Trump wins our economy tanks and the long term viability of the project our elites have been pushing since the 1990s becomes fully discredited, it might be the tipping point given everything else we've been enduring such as the drug war and the self destructive greed and corruption of our establishment. We've industrialized and seen very little in return, our 1% is literally one guy...

Revolutions only hurt the poor and pave the way for the ruthless to rule but sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do...

No. Kulak is a peasant who gives credits to other peasants making them work those credits out. Kulaks were village bourgeois.
This. Rise of political Islam happened because of USA ruining left wing parties all over the world so people who would become left wingers to seek social justice are becoming Islamists. Now Europeans complaining about "leftists" while ALL their major political forces are neoliberals, the most left they have are left liberals in some countries.

Lenin was as Jewish as he was Swedish, but you never hear about that for some weird reason

There is no Swedish tribes though.

>No. Kulak is a peasant who gives credits to other peasants
That's what jewish commies told you, retard. There weren't any credoits in Tsar Russia, idiot.

Are you idiot? EU is totally liberal. It was created by capitalist countries to unite their markets to multiply the effect.

>that's gommie Russian episode

Islamic gommunism in germany

He's probably a brain-dead conservative

Lol. So that's why USSR was superpower?

The lenin's period had so much freedom.
In 1917, the Russian Revolution saw the overthrow of the Tsarist government, and the subsequent foundation of the Russian SFSR, the world's first socialist state, followed by the founding of the Soviet Union after the end of the civil war in 1922. The new Communist Party government eradicated the old laws regarding sexual relations, effectively legalising homosexual activity within Russia, although it remained illegal in other former territories of the Russian Empire. Under Lenin's leadership, openly gay people were allowed to serve in government. In 1933, the Soviet government, under the leadership of Joseph Stalin, recriminalised homosexual activity with punishments of up to five years' hard labor

USSR was a state, it is as an entity a superpower as is United Nations a super power.

Is that actually a thing? I thought your Turks were very pro-Erdogan.