Define "developed country"

Define "developed country"

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mPne-q4ynts
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

A white country who's not slavic

Trust me
I'm a google scientist

Fucked up jew slaves with no morals and diseased bodies

>Chile
>Argentina
>Saudi Arabia

>korea
>japan
>china
Kys.

>korea
what did he mean by this?

>China
>developped
Unless you're talking about Taiwan, kys

That you are a developed cunt

>turkey

lower industry and agriculture is percent of total output

ouch
Common shitting on street might get in your way to club.

More precisely,country which doesn't grow (Gpd-wise) more than 1-2% yearly. It's developed already, so it doesn't develop futher easily.

and fucking Venezuela

is=as*

>korea
>developed

How developed is India? All memes aside, how long is it going to take until countries like India/Pakistan/Bangladesh reach first world status?

youtube.com/watch?v=mPne-q4ynts
You tell me.

Must be based on HDI much like the map you'd find on the wikipedia article. Saudi is probably not counting the third of the population that's foreigners working as virtual salves and Venezuela is probably creative reporting back when high oild prices made it plausible... Argentina and Chile do have high HDI although their industrial baes are not comparable, even on per capita basis, with those of Brasil and Mexico... "developed country" is mostly geopolitical as a definition, in this sense it should not count any Middle Eastern country outside Israel (even if in fact it's Arab population and the inclussion of Palestine territories in it's economies make it more like NIC) and it remains some matter of debate which Latin America country will be the first to achieve ths status uncontrovertailly. While Chile is generally considered the best candidate I think it will be a much smaller country like Uruguay or Costa Rica even if they won't have had prosperity and stability for as long, as the IMF which is the institution most likely to make it official through it's reports wil probably find it easier to use one of these as a first model for the region.

>venezuela
lmoa

Big dick

A country that shits on a toilet

>how long is it going to take until countries like India/Pakistan/Bangladesh reach first world status?
Quite a long time. Their access to clean water is questionable and it's only going to get worse. Their rivers aren't very well suited for commercial shipping either

>chile
>venezuela
>argentina
ayy

I would say 50-60 years, however some things will not change.

Right now those countries have GDP per capita equivalent to that of US, Japan, West Europe, etc, in the 40s, however, the crime rate of the first world even in the 40s was still far lesser than that of the third world.

Some problems are therefore inherently natural to some countries, while some others can be fixed.

Also, keep in mind, that by the time the countries you mentioned reach the current American level of civilization, the USA will already have developed immortality, quantum computing, etc.

All nations are ultimately doomed to have a development gap between each other, this is clearly seen all across history. Romans vs barbarians, Chinese vs Mongols, Americans vs Mexicans, etc.

We cant really predict with accuracy who will be in the vanguard or for what reason, but its certain that someone will be there.

they will have toilets eventually, but rally tiny ones

At least you'll have employment once the UK officially leaves

Only real pross will work with Indian toilets, that's gonna be some "fixing the watch" tier of job

Low crime, good living conditions.

Predictions are not as straightforward as that and adoption of technology isn't linear, most Indians will own a smart phone befor they have what in the West would be considered adequate sanitation. And smartphones are a relative new development compared to flushing toilets... Even so, most of us do not consider it necessary to own Japanese style toilets with integrated bidets and and a dozen other overengineered options but this is likely the future, even if you still consider it practical to keep a roll of toilet paper at hand in terms of sustainability bidets are much better (less use of water than required to make paper) and they also have the advantage of being more hygienic... On the other hand even Europe isn't quite adopting things like gargage disposals or dish washers which are common in the US.

You mention Americans vs Mexicans, there's nothing that's available in the US that's not available here and on much the same premise (eg for those who can affotrd it) yes, quality of life in undoubedly better for most in the US and more people have access to obtain it but we've gone ahead with things like universal healthcare while they have a looming aging infrastructure problem. A 16 year period of bad calls (eg two bad presidents still winning re-elections for them) and we could potentially catch up to the point of surpassing them in a few small areas. Mexico was not a violent country through much of the 20th century, at our worst our murder rate never went above your nation's which arguably has had some relatively good decades, my pont being anyone can catch up or fall behind, no one is guaranteed success...