>still using CCleaner
>still using windows
wired.com
Still using CCleaner
Other urls found in this thread:
arstechnica.com
piriform.com
archive.is
twitter.com
Pastebin that shit, nigguh
>still using windows
lol no.
>andrew greenberg
ALLAHU AKBAR
Don't companies keep a log of alterations done to a product's code on a regular basis? I assume it would be very easy to spot the employee who inserted the malicious line into CCleaner.
A cheap restaurant can keep track of who opened the cashier when, please tell me a security company would have the ability to keep track of something this basic.
>wired.com
>arsshittica.com
kys you dumb retards for pasting direct links to these CANCEROUS websites that push fake news.
it wasn't an employee
what links should I post?
Oh ok from what I read I thought it was someone inside the company that changed the code.
I would use linux if it had any video games
where did you get that impression?
Faget
This is the chink stuxnet. They're going to sabotage intel's and samsung's foundries in retaliation for the Xeon embargo.
piriform.com
>An unauthorized modification of the CCleaner.exe binary resulted in an insertion of a two-stage backdoor capable of running code received from a remote IP address on affected systems.
When I read that I just assumed someone changed the code without authorization.
>Unauthorized
Aka someone from outside
>Wired
No.
the same news in on tons of different sites. What site should I have posted?
Could mean he didn't have permission to do it. Unauthorised doesn't necessarily mean someone from outside. Not everyone within a company is authorised to do anything.
Post whichever you got first, Sup Forums will fight about anything.
PASTEBIN YOU FUCKING USELESS FAGGOT
so I should copy the article and post it to pastebin? lmao what the fuck?
Yes, or copy paste the relevant information into posts here, try to show at least some modicum of courtesy
>32 bit
>2017
Nice FUD.
>newfags who don't know anything about archive.is
what? why? are you this fucking paranoid about going to a site?
This is plagiarism. Wired owns the content, they deserve the credit, and the control of its distribution.
because you're all too autistic to archive it yourselves
archive.is
its about not want wanting to give them clicks and pageviews
you really think you make any difference?
lurk more
Moving past this, lazy at best, "the ends justify the means" mentality, why would one even want to do this? Does it host malicious ads? Provided one is interested in this particular article, why not reward it with a click? You want more good articles, after all.
Lurk more you fucking newfag
the russians and the chinese are getting frighteningly good at this
archived: archive.is
While I can get behind the anti-Windows sentiment, it's pretty impossible for a medium-sized or larger company to completely ban Windows, inside and outside its network (an employee may read their e-mail on a Windows PC at home and it's still a security risk).
It's okay to be part of botnet if it's against corps.
Soo is this update pop-up legit or what the fuck?
Just downgrade to v5.32 and keep it forever. That was the last good version before Avast acquired Piriform.
It's legit, but you're better off downloading the installer off the website
...
How about I reward my dick into your newfag ass, how about that lol
>32 bit
what?