Sup Forums, what the fuck is the W3C?

Sup Forums, what the fuck is the W3C?

Does it even exist? It doesn't seem so. We've all been duped.

youtube.com/watch?v=S97TCpuBvnc

Instead of attaching "eye catching" images to your boring threads as a way to beg people to respond can you just not make shit threads instead thanks in advance.

This is actually important, you fucking faggot.

>posting GD-triggering gifs to draw in (You)s

Should be a bannable offence desu

It's a random gif. Sorry you haven't seen a AFK girl in forever that your attention is automatically consumed to digital images. Fucking brainlet NEETS

fuck you i'm constantly horny

>the W3C is a conspurrrrrraaaaaaahceaaay
>"actually important"
Please jump off a 4 story building and land on your face.

Does anyone know what happend to these girls when it went viral?

>doesn't watch video
>jumps to conclusions

Think you need to do what you suggest, yourself. The world would be better off without your downs syndrome spreading everything.

>hey bro, watch this 18 minute video about this nobody ranting about shit he has no fucking clue about

Lunduke is alright, but his product reviews are pretty shitty I have to say

>he's not popular
>who cares what he says

Again, you don't know how to think. Why are you on the technology board again, you wannabe? Go back to Sup Forums.

>ranting
He's actually digging deep into a subject that is, indeed, important.

Also, there are questions in the OP unrelated to the video. I know you brainlets usually have ADD, but those questions can be answered, preferably by someone other than your retarded self.

What is a "AFK" girl?

Girl on the right probably became a pornstar, if she wasn't already.

they married each other

away from keyboard

>Sup Forums, what the fuck is the W3C?
Supporting google/microsoft/mozilla agenda?

What does her being away from a keyboard have to do with anything?

>Why are you on the technology board again, you wannabe?
Why are you, posting fucking "tech reviewers" as source?

>He's actually digging deep into a subject that is, indeed, important.
LOOOOL okay bro

>He's actually digging deep into a subject that is, indeed, important.
He should stay with FOSS things. He can't stop censorship and user hostility of nasdaq fags with his vlog and stuff.

The girl in beige is the Corporate botnet, the girl in black is the W3C -- notice how she's smiling? This is clearly a relevant jif.

Not posting as a source, but as a starting point for further discussion.

Why are you using an unnecessary comma?

MOMMY

I'm open to this idea, but your condescending tone throughout the entire video is autistic. Your audience is unlikely children, so stop treating them like they are.

>GD

Please tell me this doesn't stand for gender dysphoria.

He hasn't seen a girl while HE'S been away from his keyboard--i.e., he's seen girls only on his computer.

>LOOOOOL okay bro
Facebook fag.

If the W3C isn't a legitimate business, which is what it looks like, then that is fucking important.

Sup Forums just takes the opposite position to whatever anyone is talking about. They will literally suck Sir Tim Berners-Lee's corporate sponsored dick just to spite you. I'd give up dude, the upside is when the last vestiges of the free web die off, everyone who is here has been tracked by google for a long time (check out the scripts embedded), so we are all going to be flagged as miscreants later on.

stop arguing faggots just post more qt schoolgirls please

Yeah, I know, user. But there are a few people that care, and those are the people that I'm reaching out to; the trolls are there, there's nothing anyone can do about that.

I'm looking for the scripts now, can you point me in the right direction? I've just installed Privacy Badger, love it so far. I'll block the scripts.

Here's one more.

>you
Autism.

deled dis

haha faggot

wut?

>the unconventional scissor technique

these are actually two males, which makes more sense

shut up

Reminder that Bryan Lunduke is a performer and a drama queen, not a good source of information.

His initial claim to fame was his "Why Linux Sucks" talk, which he made with minimal actual knowledge of Linux mostly because it got a reaction out of people who appreciated the comedy of the structure of the talk (where he first ragged on Linux for various reasons, and then turned around to praise it for those same reasons).

Now he's making clickbait about the W3C "not existing" because the W3C is currently a hot topic with the whole DRM thing, and he knows coming up with "dirt" on it will get him attention.
His entire reasoning for why the W3C doesn't exist is because it has never applied to legally incorporate itself, so it isn't a distinct legal entity. And no shit, it doesn't pretend to be a legal entity. It's a consortium of prominent internet pioneers that put together standards that they think should be followed, and implementors have liked their suggestions enough to generally follow them. That's all they've ever claimed to have been, and that's all they need to be.

They aren't.

"Internet Pioneers" that happen to have to stump up large amounts of cash for a vote.

Lunduke is an actual journalist. Hardly any of his content has to do with "reviews", and the ones that do are incredibly transparent.

>this is actually important
>posts porno
i hide threads started with women, fyi. no good ever comes from them. not a high IQ discussion .

I didn't know having ADHD was a valid argument for why someone else's point is worthless

You can't stop a hurricane. Does that mean that journalists shouldn't cover it?

He's a former software engineer and a member of the OpenSuse committee. He knows a lot more than he lets on. And the "Why Linux Sucks" talks were profound as commentary on how we appreciate GNU/Linux. And he's probably the only journalist in the tech industry that's even covering w3c at the depth he is. He was the only journalist who even showed up, even. And you missed the entire point of the video, where he addresses precisely why the w3c should be treated as something more than a loose "consortium".

put your trip back on bryan

If you wanted an interesting thread, you should have used this image.

Has Bryan ever posted here before?

Idk I know he responds to things posted on the linux subreddit

...

I wish I was a Japanese lesbian, it's all I ask.

Oh, you mean an IRL girl.

That's completely different.

yes, but i was talking about the trip in jest.