Are Slavs white?

Are Slavs white?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov–Ribbentrop_Pact
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camps_for_Russian_prisoners_and_internees_in_Poland_(1919–24)
youtube.com/watch?v=2sV0s5-gXkM&feature=youtu.be&t=83
wspanialarzeczpospolita.pl/2014/08/22/jezyk-polski-na-sri-lance/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoamine_oxidase_A
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Kempka
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Nobody is white. Welcome to the post-Obama world

Slavs are eastern finns

Russians*

No

they're butifel elves

>"are Slavs white?"
>posts a Finn
And no, Slavs are not white
Russians who live in Far East near border with China are obviously completely indistinguishible from Chinese

We are Sarmatians and Wends, I'm a Jew

Balkans are Turks in denial except for Macedonians who are descendants of Alexandros ho Megas, Greeks, and therefore OBVIOUSLY not white

Hitler said no

>We are Sarmatians and Wends

MY

>I'm a Jew
I am Greek.
You can find left in Poland/Czech and Baltic states and you can fin right in Germany.

Unless that's how average male looks like, stop posting this bullshit,

Just look at the skin color bro

Russians said no to Hilter.

nope, they aren't

they're like meds, white people's superior cousins

nope, shitskins

>Russians said no to Hilter.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov–Ribbentrop_Pact

No.

Poland especially isn't white, they're most slavic

Poland plz.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camps_for_Russian_prisoners_and_internees_in_Poland_(1919–24)

thank you darling :*

Funny you give that example.

It's like comparing 5 star hotel to a fucking gulag.
Not slavic, but most PIE.

np.

These evil white men want to steal our identity, culture and achievements... baka senpai

They are white until there are no more Arabs/Blacks and you need another bogeyman to blame your problems on.

This kind of cherrypicking and dehumanising is exactly what I'm talking about.

>Not slavic, but most PIE.
wait, we are again some ancient shit from babylon?

People in the European genetic cluster are white.

they put benis into each other butts the way that no any animal does, or so I heard

youtube.com/watch?v=2sV0s5-gXkM&feature=youtu.be&t=83
>slav in anglosphere alma-mater - London

Proto Indo-European, my friend.
Look at pali language and look at Polish

wspanialarzeczpospolita.pl/2014/08/22/jezyk-polski-na-sri-lance/

WE

I have urgent masturbation at my shedule, I'll give it a look once I'm done

>It's like comparing 5 star hotel to a fucking gulag.

>Between 16,000-17,000 (Polish figures)[2] and 18,000-20,000 (Russian figures)[2] died, mostly as a result of harsh conditions and epidemics which raged in the camps.

No, Poland, you deserved it, evil motherfucker.

That's racialist bullshit. You can find a thousand reason to divide the Europeans people.

There is no such thing as a "white race", since races are gradients with no clear cuts boundaries. Example are the Spaniards, at the boundary between "white" and "Arabs".

Some of them look white but they're not white on the inside.

user, all people are red if you pick inside them.

Russian lives don't count anyway.

You're all peasants that rebelled against your Polish Pan.

?

Slavs are essentially white niggers.

It's genetics. It's the same metric biologists use to differentiate between subspecies.

I will move my hand up and down while grabing my penis. Don't tell me you never heard of it

that would be germans

>lesser degree of shoveling

What did he mean by this ?

I don't know, most Poles don't look like Slavs, for example I'm Jew converted to Catholicism generations ago.

N-no

A full blown nigger is someone who has 2R MAO-A.

>An association between the 2R allele of the VNTR region of the gene and an increase in the likelihood of committing serious crime or violence has been found.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoamine_oxidase_A

don't ever do this, it's a sin

>against your Polish Pan
Like this one?

it's more related to finnic blood
he's a kike, so no

No anthropologist classify human subspecies, and even there were, the master race would then be mixed race individuals.

Also if they are subspecies, then why are Asian races generally put to the top now when they were at the bottom a few decades ago ?

Probably a technical term.

Yes. Studies show that blue eye colour actually comes from Eastern Europe and not Northern Europe. So they're whiter than you originally though.

This man is saint and because of you, animals, we have just one left. Don't even fucking think about it.

Too late now :(

Slavs being white supremacists, especially neo-nazis makes zero sense to me... didn't Hitler want to exterminate Slavs?

I'm aroused right now

>didn't Hitler want to exterminate Slavs?
While having Croatians and Slovenians in his amy.

Stop this bullshit.

you will burn in hell forever
still, imo worth it

Also, Jews in army and as elite SS

and Polish chauffeur of Hitler
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Kempka

>flag
no shit

>While having Croatians and Slovenians

Pragmatism. Same way he allied with Soviet, same way he gave away right to Ukrainian minorities in occupied Poland to piss off poles and appease Ukrainians before their turn would come.

>No anthropologist classify human subspecies
Because of political correctness

>, the master race would then be mixed race individuals.
This is nonsense and I'm not talking about "master" races. I'm talking about biological data.

>Also if they are subspecies, then why are Asian races generally put to the top now when they were at the bottom a few decades ago ?

Complete irrelevant nonsense. An existance of subcategories does not imply any kind of hierarchy.

...

>While having Croatians and Slovenians in his amy.
Bitch please. He have blacks, arabs, gypsies in his army, but only germans was in real battalions, all another was like guard dogs.

>but only germans was in real battalions
see

...

He made up stories about their origins.

Slovenians = Germans
Croats = Goths

>Because of political correctness
Nope.
>The rejection of the race concept by most anthropologists beginning most recently in the 1960s, was based on the genetic evidence... Conformity to political correctness was not the cause of these changes.[2]

>I'm talking about biological data.
>An existance of subcategories does not imply any kind of hierarchy.

Why bother categorising then ?
>Race is not an accurate or productive way to describe human biological variation.
—Edgar & Hunley (2009)

Also, funny how two black-skinned population (Africa/Oceania) have the highest distance. And funny how said distance is only 25%, which means 75% of those 120 classical polymorphisms are shared. Also, there could be a bit of Levontin fallacy here, there are much more than 120 polymorphisms to define us.

the one on the right looks like my cousin

What are we if not white? Black?

Caucasoid-Mongol, which the majority of Slavs are.

You, my dear friend, are a steppe archer.
I am a big fan of yurts.

>1960s
The decade which marked the birth of political correctness and before we knew much about human genetics.

>Also, funny how two black-skinned population (Africa/Oceania) have the highest distance.
It's called convergent evolution. Who cares about skin colour?

>Why bother categorising then ?
The genetic metric (used to generate the map) between two chimp subspecies is greater than the distance between Africans and Australian aboriginals. Why do we categorize animals? Because of human curiosity.

Put Mongol first and you are correct.

We are Mongol - Caucasoid, not the other way around.

I'm not Kazakh, I'm Russian.

Your Caucasian features are more prominent than your Mongoloid features

Also, Slavs have no soul

good thread

We are all steppe archers, we slavs

though granted only kazakh still live in the beautiful yurts.

obviously never met a slav.
That's simply not true.

We have people of Mediterranean complexion among ethnic Russians

They look like Southern Europeans, but with more pale skin

Just like the French have no balls

>Are slavs white?

Huh, yes?

>The decade which marked the birth of political correctness and before we knew much about human genetics.
The decade we also learned much about biology and all.

>It's called convergent evolution. Who cares about skin colour?
A lot of racialists, and apparently this thread too. If you establish that there are human subspecies,

>The genetic metric
Levontin's fallacy, there are tons of metrics, and here only 120 are measured. At least in they tried to show more metrics.

It's not just political correctness though, Aboriginals, Blacks, Arabs and all are human beings sharing much more than what divides them. I don't see the point in divining them for 15% (in most cases) of variations.

t. russia's backyard

Say that to the 2 millions who died during WW1, more dead than your whole population you gypsy horse fucker

post qt serb girls pls

Being white or shit is about where you live and where your ancestors lived, because of the climate. Put an average autistic mongoloid Finn somewhere hot and he will most probably die.
Look at niggers in USA. They are more brown than black, unlike their brothas in Africa who are black as coal.

Were Slavs at any stage white?

Like the inhabitants of Iberia were once white before the Moorish occupation, however now they are just brownish Moor offspring. A lot of the Moorish traits can be seen in today's Portuguese/Spanish people.

Does that mean Slavs were not always non-white, and at one stage in history, white too?

They're not even human.

they're not white.
I am greek

I dont think so. Its like, if you cant play a piano and match the native abo music right next to you, you arent white.

I'll better say that to those who gave up Northern France to Hitler without a single gunshot.

No.

We are originally mongol.

Hello brotherly steppe archer

what do you think about us, french user?

North western russians and finns and lithuanians are the purest "whites"

The highest percentage of blondes and blue eyed peoples are in the baltic region.

almond shaped eyes are almost never seen in this region, almond shaped eyes are semitic/african in origin and for some reason people automatically assume "slanty eyes" to be a non white feature when it actually is.

>look at niggers in the USA, they are more brown that black

thats because of the racemixing, and i dont even mean the recent racemixing, their slave ancestors were literally raped by thier white masters regulary, thats why almost every african american person has some white in his DNA

are u the tatar serb with the throat vocaroo? hello my slightly autist friend

It is not their fault you french are stupid as fuck

>germans have machine guns
>we better run towards them
>200 000 died inside 3 days

???

I see your point

No, but you piqued my curiosity.

dosta je bilo momky

You're pretty much at a border "racially" speaking between Asians, White, and Arabs.

I wished you were more secular. I think I met some turks in my neighbourhood, seemed kinda nice.

The iberians were never white.
They were of semitic/berber origin, the romans who were themselves questionably white described the iberians as very swarthy and curly haired.

The only reason why iberians today are somewhat european is due to mass constant migration from central europe for thousands of years.

Slavs have always been white, slavs and people from the baltic region are less mixed than western europeans.

...

>The decade we also learned much about biology and all.
The studies on human genetics are fairly recent.

>It's not just political correctness though, Aboriginals, Blacks, Arabs and all are human beings sharing much more than what divides them.

Sounds warm and fuzzy except people other than white humanitarian liberals are ethnocentric and ethnocentrism is a winning strategy:

jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

> I don't see the point in divining them
They're already divided. People tend to form enclaves. And there is a biological and evolutionary basis for it. Lying about biology is not going to unite Africans and Aboriginals.

...