How can lincucks ever compete?

How can lincucks ever compete?

Lol why. Stupid idea

And winfags still don't accept that Windows 10 is a botnet.

>Windows can detect mental illness and reach out for help on behalf of the user
Thanks Microsoft, you always have our backs.

>taking away user autonomy and privacy
>a good thing
Pick one

There's going to be some spam then because continuing to use Windows is a mental illness.

Literally spyware

Maybe next they can work on detecting the early signs of freetardation, before they're too far gone to behave themselves around normal people.

>LGBT support websites

LMAO, do they mean porn? that's hilarious

>using software that Windows doesn't like is a mental disorder
I wonder who you're working for
I think they mean lgbt support sites, but I'm sure other sites are included

Apple has being doing this for years - if you own one their products , then you're a fag.

I said nothing about using Macs, did I? It's just you evangelical freetards that can't accept that you have a problem.

>over bearing parents turn this on
>beat him even worse after browsing sites
>MS gets sued for mental anguish

this could actually happen

Parents who understand computers could do this anyway. Of course libtards primary concern isn't that windows is a botnet and all they care about is that the evil christian parents are going to find out their kids are faggots.

I don't go around pushing Linux onto everyone, but thanks for lumping everyone who uses Linux into some strawman caricature that fits your narrative

you can do this right now regardless of OS
lmao do people still not know how anything works

also btfo fags

>Compares the most common and useful operating system for end users to mental illness
>Doesn't go around pushing Linux onto everyone
Pick one.

I never said using windows was a mental illness, so I'll pick the second one

Linux is the most useful operating system.

On one hand it's a botnet, on the other hand fags will get snuffed out before they become a problem.

>doesn't have a girlfriend/fiancee/wife who brings home other girls for the two of you to enjoy, sexually.
There is nothing wrong with lesbians

now this is a botnet I can get behind

see:
>continuing to use Windows is a mental illness

putting windows 10 on all computers i can get my hands on
it's time to weed future node developers OUT

Ok, that's not me though.

The first thing I hear from microsoft that isn't complete retardation.

but still spyware

You can automatically tell if your child is gay if they're using MacOS so it's not like it's any better than Apple

>people care that parents are going to use this societally-endorsed surveillance to beat their kids up for daring to go against their morals
what a fucking horrible reality.
i have and always will believe that faggotry is a mental illness, but this isn't okay.
in the real world, we can't prevent this from happening in full, because we can't take kids away from people who are objectively wrong, (this includes "non-violent" members of the cult that is islam) but this is still a bad thing, and we take kids away from their parents for schooling because of this.

xDD Aplel iz so gay rofl

Basically. Not only is being gay not a crime, but this "feature" is pushing a civilian police mentality, where we are obligated and encouraged to police the actions of our friends, family, and loved ones because these corporations just make it so easy to do. It's disgusting

>out people to their parents
Isn't this what the lgbt community wants?
I've seen lots of hostility to privacy from that front.

>kids
>privacy

Do you even know who the CEO of apple is?

>this thread
so Sup Forums really wasn't against botnets for privacy's sake but rather because whatever implicated corporation wasn't fronting their identity politics. shocking.

They want people to be able to speak to their parents about being gay or whenever, not have them found out because some faceless email server sent an email to their parents saying "your kid went on (lgbt site)". There might be some who want forced outing like you say, but they're probably the extreme ones
yes user. My parents firmly believed in me having my privacy unless they had a reason to revoke it temporarily. Did yours not allow you to have a door to your bedroom? Did they force your to leave the bathroom door open when you showered or used the toilet?

You called?

No one here actually goes on Sup Forums.
>le pol bugiemen xd

They make gayness out to be like some kind of disease, and on the same site they'll talk about gay pride festivals and how gay is ok.
Which is it?
You can't have it both ways.

Tim Cook. And before you ask, yes, I know he's homosexual.

you can still be a Sup Forumsyp and not go on Sup Forums. wasn't my point anyway.
also i find leakage not being a thing pretty hard to believe considering its popularity

Holy shit

I'm screwed

I don't know how you can be "outed" by a fucking email, gays these days are so goddamn loud and vain that you can see it coming a mile away.
How do you know if someone is gay?
Don't worry, they'll fucking tell you.

>they want people to be able to talk
But why do they hate privacy so much then? This is actually the first article I've seen where privacy has been shown in a good light from that end. It's always hostility towards others opinions or the idea of outing people as [insert wrong opinion here concerning any topic in the world].

You can't have one without the other. Implicit in privacy is that you don't have an arbiter. It wouldn't be private otherwise.

has microsoft directly dabbled in idpol?
also whatever this atricle's referring too could just be a side-effect of whatever feature this is supposed to be

how do we use this to our benefit Sup Forums?

...

Who is this "they"? Lgbt advocates want kids to feel comfortable talking to their parents about it. I don't think they hate privacy, considering privacy is in some cases the only thing keeping them from being kicked out, beaten by family/friends, etc.

No that's not true user. There's homosexuals who live in heterosexual relationships because stigma against homosexuals.
I don't really care if some kid in the west is outed to his parents but there's parts in the world where people might get tortured or killed.
Infect victim with a bot that plausibly visits a continuation of sites that'd implicate them in things they weren't involved in. Or better, implicate them in things they've been involved in.

You know, if you're in a country where being gay is grounds for stoning, I doubt you're going to want to browse lgbt shit unless you have a death wish.

i hope everyone excited about this gets their porn history emailed to their grandparents

>Who is they
LGBT groups i read about in the papers mostly. Locally (in my country). I don't concern myself with such details on a global scale. Too much work.
It's a fair point but I personally believe careless people have the same human rights as the rest of us.
The same could be said in this situation. It's not stoning but if you're not out don't browse gay shit in an OS that doesn't respect your privacy.

we share new discoveries all the time
unlike you fags

Huh, I've never heard of that happening. I don't think I've met any lgbt support people or groups who actively want to remove ones privacy to make the come out to their family/friends sooner. Which country do you live in?

Careless people are literally retarded.
People have a self-preservation mechanism that kicks in when they're about to do something that might be potentially deadly, if yours doesn't work when living in a country where anal sex = death penalty, then you're too stupid to live.

LOL you share your porn history with your grandma?

I can hate the botnet and gay people. It's not hard user.

>certain people deserve to die if they don't take the same precautions that I do to ensure I'm not doing anything wrong
how can one person be so self centered?
I don't think that's a valid counter argument to his point

..but in hating the latter in this context, you're supporting the former. that's called a cognitive dissonance, user. it's a thing idiots do

it's not cognitive dissonance to hate both botnet and gay people. if gay people came out against the botnet i'd still hate them.

Don't be mentally ill and you won't have a problem.

Where did I say I supported microsoft or botnets?

>lol just be normal, I can do it so it must be easy

>be retard
>break laws
>get punished
You're effectively advocating that gays break the sovereign laws of their own country, I bet you're one of those "fuck borders and shit" liberal retards.

>I've never heard of that kind of hostility to privacy
No I'm not talking about specifically forced outing. I haven't heard of that either. I live in Sweden. I don't have the perspective but I don't expect them to be more radical. Gay rights issues are fairly minor here right now. But privacy issues were hot ~10 years ago due to certain bills being passed and basically everyone had an opinion.
>they deserve it
That's your view. I don't think people deserve to die based on their inability to protect themselves.
The only thing I see justifying death in others is if they directly harm others sufficiently. And that's in direct response, not a death-penalty justification.

>Tell me more about Linux
>okay, this is the command line...
>Excuse me a moment

>26th August 2015, 6:07 PM

but you love the botnet when it outs gay people against their will. IE you love the botnet in its function
your argumentation with me on this to begin with. if you're ok with what this article's implying, you're ok with botnets violating security.

How retarded are you that this was never obvious? Sup Forums and tumblr have always been the same

>implying he isn't just a projecting retard himself

>if you're ok with what this article's implying
When did I ever once indicate I was okay with it?

I've never said anything of that sort. No one should be killed for their attraction to whichever sex. At the same time, when you live with suppressing who you are, day in and day out for years, sometimes you need an outlet. Just a day to talk to someone who understands, who doesn't hate you for such a small thing.
>laws are always just, even if it means killing people for being different
I hate people like you, but I still think you deserve privacy and to not be spied on, or to have your sites sent to your parents because, let's be honest, you still live with them
Without a doubt he is

..you haven't said much at all against it. only pedantically stammered to me about the non-existent nuance in your retarded politics.

It seems you're incapable of getting the point. Your opening post in the thread is a false dichotomy. There is nothing stopping me from hating microsoft and fags. Hell, it's actually pretty easy these days since tech companies are ludicrously liberal now.

Parents have the right to spy on their kids online activities, but your OS shouldn't come with built-in spyware. It's not complicated.

There is nothing wrong with policing the actions of your children. Your kids are probably going to grow up to be degenerates.

>Parents have the right to spy on their kids online activities, but your OS shouldn't come with built-in spyware.
how does the former mentality not inevitably lead to the latter in function? here we go again with the cognitive dissonances. is this your brain on id/pol/?
yep, looks like it.

That's a good feature tho

>how does the former mentality not inevitably lead to the latter in function? here we go again with the cognitive dissonances. is this your brain on id/pol/?
Are you retarded? I said "built-in spyware." Do you seriously not understand the difference between installing FOSS monitoring software yourself and proprietary backdoors?

>not following your narrow-minded worldview is degeneracy
why should I assume my kids have no right to privacy, when they've done nothing wrong?

>browsing the internet on a designated "family" account with parental filters and expecting privacy

Microsoft is just taking something that's normally an add-on product made by someone else, i.e. missed revenue, and turning it into a built-in feature of their OS as more of a reason to purchase a w10 machine or upgrade to w10.

Fact is, the type of parents that would utilize features like this would purchase third party products that do the same damn thing anyway, so anyone vilifying Microsoft for it has their moral compass pointing the wrong fuckin' way. Guaranteed, you can do this on ANY operating system currently in use on consumer systems today.

The fact that you fucking kikes actually believe an internet meme proves what mentally ill cock-sucking faggots you are. Please kill yourselves.

how is FOSS monitoring not just localized spyware? you clearly don't have a problem with it in general. you don't care about privacy as long as the outcome fronts your identitarian agenda. you are exactly who i was talking about in my first post.

porn lesbians are fine
lesbians in reality != porn lesbians

Source on your claim that parents who would use this would already be buying third party software to do so?
I don't know user, my girl has bagged some good looking women. They were probably bi though, so that might explain it

The fact that said software exists in the first place? Are you fucking retarded?

I'm officially out of this thread. The idiocy is too thick.

By giving your children "rights" you're just giving the opportunity to do bad things that they otherwise couldn't get away with.
Since when does browsing Sup Forums mean that you think people should have privacy? There is no idealogical requirement to post here.

My parents wanted to know what I was doing online but they didn't buy said software. Ease of access to the functionality is the tipping point, I'd argue. I bet there would be a lot of parents using this feature that didn't even know other software that does the same thing already exists.
I don't want to live in a police state, or scare my kids into doing the right thing by enforcing such measures in my house.
>implying kids don't have rights
how often do you get outside? Just curious

By giving your country's population "rights" you're just giving them the opportunity to do bad things that they otherwise couldn't get away with

Exactly.
Nobody has rights. If you violate someones rights nothing happens to you because they are imaginary.

>Since when does browsing Sup Forums mean that you think people should have privacy? There is no idealogical requirement to post here.
since when did I say or imply that? all i was saying is that you're a retard for it. stop with fallacious questions. though i've got a question myself. since when are you not proving verbatim that you're exactly the type of person i was talking about in my first post? since when did you not miss my point entirely?

Lol okay user. Go shoplift and tell me how that works out for you

>nobody has rights
..except parents who want to spy on their children, apparently. this is some entertaining mental gymnastics, i gotta say

pinko begone

(that's not what you call fascists)

(it's a tough distinction nowadays)

Make Windows Great Again

You become a continuation of that user's ideals by replying in your manner. We don't have sufficient information to determine you as your own individual.

>2 hours later
Whatever helps you sleep at night

I just found this thread. I am continuing the ideals of the previous user by replying to you.

Ah, so you're projecting. Well user, just because two people say something similar about one topic doesn't mean they share the same ideals or are the same person. In fact, if I were to apply your own logic to yourself, I'd say you are the same user as the one I was talking to before. You wouldn't want that, since I've already figured him to be a corporate onahole and you probably deserve better

Projecting is a better term, thank you. You are right in the sense that I would not ideally want you to believe that I am the same individual you were originally referring to. I personally think/feel that because of the nature of this image board in terms of separating individuals into their own entity's, reading all the replies in a linear fashion then adding on top of it is the most efficient way to contribute to the conversation in a productive and a fun recreational way. I agree that I myself do not actually have the ideals of the user before me to the best of my knowledge and as such I am projecting as you said before while adding my opinion to the reply.