Which shell does Sup Forums use, and why? I'm using zsh right now

Which shell does Sup Forums use, and why? I'm using zsh right now.

>not using ed or dc as your interface

I really enjoy fish but most of the time I just use bash because it's what everyone else uses.

What are the high points of fish? I'm interested.

i like ac/dc as much as the next guy, but we're talking about shells here dude.

bash, that's a shell right?

I use zsh because it handles multi-line output saved to a variable better than bash does.

I use bash because it’s the default for Ubuntu LTS and it works

What's an advantage of alternate shell to someone who doesn't do programing or use arch?

It's zsh on steroids

Bash, because getting used to the defaults

Sensible defaults, good autocompletion out of the box, simplified syntax makes it much more friendly for scripting, though it's slightly less powerful for some obscure uses.

i was looking into fish and zsh but i figured it would be wasted when the majority of my work is on remote machines

>inb4 change remote machines from bash to alternative
i dont have that type of access generally.
95% of the time its a stripped user without many permissions

openbsd-pkdsh on OpenBSD, mksh on everything else

Zsh back then, fish nowadays.

maybe some obscure plugins that won't work in bash

Currently powershell as I'm stuck with win10 as long as I edit my short film. When I re install my antergos ssd to my shitty ass notebook i'll have my trusty zsh. Also insterested in what benefits would fish add as an alternative
>Yfw Davinci Resolve doesn't run on your pc
>Yfw you would only use linux should it work
>Yfw at least you can play WoW and OSU! on your spare time with your gf so wingblows is not that bad

Bash. Give me a reason to switch.

>god tier
rc
>good tier
ksh
>ok tier
sh
ash
>fuck you
bash
>FUCK YOU
zsh
fish
>shiggy
csh

dash

elvish

What's wrong with Zsh? It is comfy as fuck.

bloat.
also has the same problems as bash

PowerShell.

mksh

ksh, Korn shell, most of the time. Sometimes just whatever is my OS's default.

csh and tcsh aren't that bad
>inb4 csh harmful
Yes, I read it multiple times a year.

yes it's harmful and sux. why do you use it?

For fun, just like anything else in life.

>bloat
Does this really matter when we're talking shells? Even the most bloated of shells still isn't that big by modern standards.

there's a noticable speed difference between rc and bash for example, even in interactive mode

Oh yeah, this is true. I've benchmarked scripts in bash, dash, csh, and ksh93 before.

rc is pretty neat