Were already at 8k

>were already at 8k
When will we reach 16k?(aka infinity k)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Toft6fMvByA
twitter.com/AnonBabble

8k is situational, and 16k only possibly maybe has a market in Times-Square-level presentations.

HDR and other technology that enhance the actual quality of the pixels is the future economically
unless the PC crowd manages to have their 'muh 144hz' wind caught by a top executive at LG or Samsung.

>When will we reach 16k?(aka infinity k)
When the flat panel cartel decides that they have sold enough 8k displays to us consumers, and need to force everyone into adopting a new standard, so the money keeps a coming goy.

Already done. youtube.com/watch?v=Toft6fMvByA

you realize 16k is literally just 4 4k tvs stuck side by side. there's nothing special about increasing resolution. it's only better if your hardware is better.

Are you on drugs? You probably shouldn't do drugs.

>quality of the pixels
lol

I can already imagine 16k phones being released to the market and Sup Forums fags posting stuff like
>muh quality
>real phones are 16k
>16k master race

>phone screen
>16k
so damn dumb.
you would not be able to tell the difference between 4k and 16k looking at a 12 inch phone screen.

Yes, but 8K will be 2020 - 2040
Need new tech as MicroLED

Note some fake chart are around use iPhone retina definition as base, real chart is on pic.

>1990+27
>fake graphs like this still exist
it's remarkable how many autists would believe those slopes when there's noone in the world who can distinguish between 720p and 1080p on a 30" screen from 10 feet

>12 inch phone screen.
lol

>feet
>inches

This image is useless. Thabks for nothing, user

>metric
>and imperial together
Sad!

>1080p 60fps
>Drawing 124 mpixels/s
>4k 144fps
>Drawing 1.1gpixels/s
>8K 144fps
>Drawing 4.7gpixels/s
>16k 144fps
>Drawing 19.1gpixels/s
153x the processing power of 1080p 60fps
20x the processing power of 4k 144fps
TWENTY TIMES THE PROCESSING POWER OF 4K
JUST TO DRAW YOUR FUCKING DESKTOP
user, ASK YOURSELF WHY THIS ISN'T A THING JUST YET

Nigga it's four by four 4k tv's. That's 16 4k tv's.
You're either on drugs like user said, or you're beyond fucking dumb

We'll be saying that exact thing in 100 years, and you'll be looked on as an absolute moron.

>100 years

I'm not saying it's not a good idea, I'm saying we don't have the silicon to drive that shit yet.
Sure, spread it over four graphics cards driving four screens each, but if you want just one card to drive just one display you'll have issues

Resolutions above 4K are mostly bullshit and definitely not worth the effort and price at this point.
Being able to do HDR10 and OLED properly will yield much more noticeable results.

so according to it a 6 inch screen at 1ft distance will require 8k

there is even an easier self test to see the nonsense in that plot

Kappa if I have 4ks and I multiply that by 4, I have 16ks

I think you're a victim of a common misconception. The -k notation stands for the approximate number of vertical pixel arrays a picture is composed of (a vertical array in a 4k picture has 2160 pixels and the whole picture has 3840 arrays, hence the name 4k). The confusion arises here since technically a 1080p resolution should be considered as 2k (since there are 1920 vertical arrays) but 1440p is commonly understood by the term 2k for some strange reason.

long story short, 15360x8640 resolution is 16k since 15360 ~ 16k.

>you realize 16k is literally just 4 4k tvs stuck side by side

that's 8K you retard

thank for writing that since the other faggots didn't acknowledge.

>16k is pointle-

>a vertical array in a 4k picture has 2160 pixels and the whole picture has 3840 arrays
Nigga horizontal.
It's just the number of pixels on the horizontal axis ffs, 1920x1080, it's fucking 1920.
Now the problem the user you're replying to has is that he doesn't understand that doubling the horizontal and vertical lengths of something quadruples the area.

Say you have a 1x1" box. Now get enough boxes so you can have 2x2 of these. Guess what, you need four boxes, four times as many as you had.
>BUT I ONLY DOUBLED IT I SHOULD ONLY NEED TWO BOXES TO MAKE UP A 2x2 GRID
Our education system at work, people. This user couldn't be younger than 16, and he doesn't understand squaring.

I can already run my games at 16k.
Fucking plebs without quad Titan Xs.

>Nigga horizontal.
no, it is the number of vertical lines (arrays)

>Now the problem the user you're replying to has is that he doesn't understand that doubling the horizontal and vertical lengths of something quadruples the area.
I don't think he fails to understand the basics of elementary arithmetic, let's be realistic now

>Our education system
don't know which third world education system you're subjected to be but everyone who's been to an elementary school must know the shit which you've just explained in a needlessly explicit manner

2K has yet to displace 1080p as the standard screen size. 8K is an absolute meme at this point, let alone 16K.

Stop calling 1440p 2k you fucking retards. DCI 2k is 2048x1280, 1440p is called QHD or QuadHD, because it's 4x the pixel count of 720p HD.

Oh of course I make a typo, it should be 1080 not 1280.

Problem with 8K is we have no proper 8K cameras yet.
So all you can watch is CGI or interpolated crap.

Even proper 4K cameras are very rare (99% of so-called "4K" cameras just interpolate a Bayer pattern)

just give it time

>Kappa
What?

>big resolutions on small screens
No.
PPI high enough so you can't see the pixels + supersampling is the way.
Literal 0 difference compared to super-resolution, with much less I/O strain and much fewer actual pixels to be powered/controlled.
At some point it's just placebo (compared to supersampling of same resolution, not compared to smaller resolution)

Insanely high resolutions only make sense on insanely big screens.

>metric

"4K" is metric and "UHD" is imperial - correct?

8K porn when?

Then why do VR headsets need high resolution screens?
Apparently 4K is barely enough for VR.

Why would you want to see all the skin blemishes and individual hairs?

4K porn is already disgusting.

F L Y S A F E C O M M A N D E R

Have you never had a GF? It's the same shit.

8K porn when?

blemishes is my fetish

Yeah for VR to feel like true real life you'd probably need at least 8k/240Hz. I have a Samsung Gear and even at 1440p you get some of the screen door effect.

See:
>PPI high enough so you can't see the pixels
If you have the screen showed up your face of course you'll need a bigger resolution. Not claiming otherwise.