3.5gb enough for anybody at 1080p they said

>3.5gb enough for anybody at 1080p they said
>no one needs more than 3gb of vram for 1080p they said
>why u need 2gb of vram they said

Other urls found in this thread:

skse.silverlock.org/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

12GB 1080Ti here. Feels damn good.

You already posted this today, fuck off.

Stop using 4k textures in a shitty game then.

oh i'm sorry you got proved wrong about your shitty 2gb vram card. enjoy your 8gb of ram as well while youre at it.

>just turn down the graphics
>hurr shitty game i don't like because i'm autistic who masturbates to cartoon porn because i bought into the yellow fever fad

Stop buying cheap GPUs then.

Do you spend all day here? Sad.

>install 4k texture mods for everything, even the smallest snow particle
>huur duur why I dont haev enough memory

How do you get your GPU to show up on task manager? Is it only an RX thing?

>4K textures
>still looks like muddy shit
I'm sure blown the fuck out. There is no doubt devs will abuse the newly gained VRAM for garbage purposes

Pic related, game from an age where 1280x1024 was the 4K of gaming. 62mb VRAM usage.

>have 8gb of vram
>create thread talking about games using more than 3.5gb of vram when Sup Forums says 2gb of vram is eough for 1080p
>get told turn down the grapghics because you don't need more than 3.5gb of vram
>then get told by said person to stop buying cheap gpus after told by said person to turn down the graphics becauser you don't need more than 3.5gb of vram.
>stop using high textures and told to stop complaining about lack of vram even though i'm only using 5gb of vram on my 8gb vram card and not complaining about lack of vram but rather complaining about idiots on Sup Forums who say 3.5gb of vram is enough for every body

>why u need 2gb of vram they said
What game even uses 1gb?
You only need 0,5gb as of now.
Look forward to 200mb the next year.

...

stop playing video games manchild

It is enough, retard. Games don't use raw 4k textures like your shit mod do.

I don't know that the fuck you are doing, the highest Skyrim even used with textures mods was around 1.7GB here. Vanilla users like 500 to 800MB.

fall windows creators windows update. works on any gpu.
you should try playing newer games then like doom on max settings and pubg. even destiny 2 will use ~3gb of vram at 1080p. and thats a console port. 4gb of vram is bare minimum if you want peace of mind.

>look at all the texture ram I'm using
>that fucking hilarious hand texture straight out of an N64 game

Sorry the dev for your bad game is incompetent, user.

Is that SE? Kek, don't tell me you bought that piece of shit

8 GB HBM +11 GB HMS :3

>buying amd gpus
>ever

You know those games just keep the textures in VRAM because they detect you have shitload of it and just proceed to keep it there because why not? Like I wouldn't buy a NEW card with less than 4GB now, but only because I would expect to use it 4-5 more years for as long as I can keep atleast 100 frames regardless of settings.

oh so what you're saying then the extra vram is not a waste? well, who would have thought.
>pic related
fallout 4 vram usage. i run it at fullscreen 1440p. only a handful of texture mods and all 2k since i run at 1440p.

>trusting Sup Forums

Technology board. How new are you?

HBCC is a neat feature, even if it's not really useful right now. I also like how FO4 runs like fucking trash on ultra setting regardless of what GPU you have.

>I need at least as much vram as is allocated
kys brainlet

Just because it's being used doesn't mean its needed
games cache stuff into vram just like regular ram.

Everyone that had Skyrim got it for free on Steam when it came out.

Doesn't matter, it's the inferior version.

Wow that's nice user. Have you soldered an extra dram chip on?

Turn off ENB [spoiler]fag[/spoiler]

>a shitload more stable
>actually supports 64-bit so you can use a lot more RAM
but
>no SKSE so 90% of the fun mods don't work

>C:\Users\(((YOU)))\Documents\My Games\Fallout4
>Fallout4Prefs.ini
set
>[Display] - section
>iPresentInterval=0
then open radeon settings
>gaming tab
>fallout 4 (if not there, add its profile by clocking add - browse - add its .exe)
>enable frame rate target control - set this to 60 - 70fps. up to 100 is fine for fallout 4 but to keep it safe 60 - 70
and run the game fullscreen since frame rate control ONLY works in fullscreen mode. not window fullscreen, but regular fullscreen.

you will get better performance because by default fallout 4 enables not just vsync, but tripple vsync. so if you have a 144hz display, the game will run around 45 fps. this causes insane low gpu usage which causes it to run like ass.

doing iPresentInterval=0 disables this but causes fps to skyrocket which causes the engine to freakout. so setting a frame rate control keeps the game running smoothly with increased performance.

>playing 3d games
wewlad

it does have skse now.
skse.silverlock.org/

>still playing skyrimjob in 2017

A reminder that anyone here who has 2gb of ram to kill yourself, stop slowing down performance for people who are not poor retards by shilling that “LOWER THA PERFORMANCE NAOWW!!! TOO MUCH WAM!!!”

I know you’re reading this. Just do it, you big dumb faggot.

fuck off manchild

>listening to Sup Forums

Unfortunately it's still not running amazing, figured out one issue was Radeon Chill, wasn't sure what it did, I assumed it would only lower framerate in menus and shit, but it lowers it to 40 in game. turned that off and it helped but still hitting 45-50 in the city. I think it's an I/O bottleneck, checked my disk usage and it's at 100% on a 7200RPM HDD. I'm sure switching it to SSD would probably help, but mine's only big enough for my OS.

2gb of ram? what do you need 1gb of ram for?

Also it's not really a huge deal, if I turn down settings it runs fine, it's just surprising how the game isn't fully utilizing my GPU in Boston. My 980 that I upgraded from had the same issue, at 1080p it was just sitting there doing nothing while my framerate would drop to 45.