Lol we have the same skin color as sapin and turkey
Lol we have the same skin color as sapin and turkey
>Australia
>white
AY YO HOL UP
SO YOU BE SAYIN'
*SMACKS LIPS*
WE WUZ INKAS AND SHIET???
This map is fucking fake.
Who are Native South Americans black?
And how are native australians not black? in terms of skin color of course
>tfw from the "no data" zone
What a shitty map, how the fuck is the Colombian pacific coast less dark than any other region in the whole Americas? How are Ethiopians as dark as Nigerians? How is Jamaica less dark than Peru?
just wanted to stop by and say thanks for showing me this video =)
>Galicia
>Spain
Sapin? SAPIN?
Shit map btw
It says indigenous peoples user. That map doesn't take into account recent migrations
LMAO u mad, negro?
Oh, didn't see that, anyways, how is Ethiopia as dark as Nigeria?
this is bullshit, the mapuches here have the same skin colour as a fucking arab
This has got to be fake. I can accept having the same shitskin colour with Turkey, but there's no way we're as dark as Spain.
this map doesn't make any sense
most brazilian amerindians have more or less the same skin colour, a reddish-brown hue. according to this map, amerindians from ceara are darker than people from angola
Nah, it's for indigenous peoples, We only have 1.4 million of them left while your country has around 25 million
arabs and mapuche are shown to be the same color poh
i believe this is just an estimative according to enviromental factors and ignore the real ethnic groups
new zealand is about as light as most of europe and we all know maoris are fairly dark
>congolombia es blanca
yeah, because ;
>Somalia and Ethiopia
>Western South America
>Algeria
>Rif mountains
Meme fake map
Yeah I was wondering that too.
What the hell, indios from Northeast aren't darker than the others.
there's no real citation on that number of turkish tunisian actually.
yeah I checked that before, it's one turkish unknow author from 1950 (Hizmetli, Sabri?), the guy doesn't give any census, proofs or what so ever. Ethnic datas has never been made in maghreb as far as I remember.
The 5% figure seem more logical tho.
Read the part of this book about that, what's his citation?
Turks were 1% of Algeria in 1830 (30,000) and then get kicked out by french to anatolia, how can >1% became 25% in 1950?
Never get his explaination.
check algerian autosomal result.Everything is clear
>"When the French took over on 5 July 1830, most Turks (around 15,000) returned to Turkey"
Who can 15,000 turks so 0.5% in 1830 that get banned by french became 25% in 1950?
Doesn't make sense.
Do you have a link on that?