IT'S ALIVE
Other urls found in this thread:
bugzilla.mozilla.org
bugzilla.mozilla.org
bugzilla.mozilla.org
developer.chrome.com
hackademix.net
chrome.google.com
enable-javascript.com
twitter.com
And I wish I was dead.
...
It's barely functional.
It keeps crashing my tabs.
This may end firefox for me.
NoScript was the core reason I used FF.
FF55 + NoScript is faster than FF57.
I keep getting ads and garbage in my window without NS
That's it
Bye FF
>uses CSP instead of removing JS altogether
I'll stick to my uBO/uMatrix setup.
welcome to vivaldi
t. sans firefox user
Sorry OP, I'm a uMatrissile now.
You didn't have to remind me.
works fine for me. I haven't had any issues with the new Firefox
[spoiler]I'm on a MacBook™ [/spoiler]
>uses CSP instead of removing JS altogether
the fuck?
Dumb API limitations that Mozilla didn't bother to fix before 57 got to release channels. This rapid release schedule has only brought everyone bloated version numbers and allows copious amounts of unfinished shit hitting the release, especially for a drastic change such as 57.
bugzilla.mozilla.org
bugzilla.mozilla.org
esr it is for now then
I’m starting to question the point of esr 52 when less and less extensions support it
why is everything going to shit?
why?
>IT'S ALIVE
It's lobotomized
It doesn't have a lot to work with.
So again, why would you use this over uMatrix?
Enjoy your lack of multiprocess
I already switched to uMatrix after using noscript for years. uMatrix is superior.
But is it better or worse?
Left click instead of right click, the menu looks simple...
just switch to waterfox famalam
Same. It could do with a minor interface overhaul, but really gets it mostly right.
I've read about clickjacking protection and a few other things noscript has, does umatrix have or can it emulate those features? I'm using a combo of ublock and umatrix, is there anything I'm missing out on with these two?
>options available: enable scripts yes/no
wow thanks, I couldnt do that before in any browser since forever, I really needed an extension for that, finally, you saved my life wow
No, and it blocks scripts from running instead of truly turning them off so elements don't work.
You can force multiprocess by using different profiles
It doesn’t work near as well as 54+
what is noscript supposed to do?
>FF55 + NoScript is faster than FF57.
kek what?
every browser becomes the fastest when you, you know, disable javascript and basically 99.99% of the internet
This is a minor complaint, honestly. At this point, most sites attempt to force you to run scripts because muh user experience, i.e. so they can run botnet.
I would not be surprised if there is a move soon to deprecate altogether because you why would anyone make a site that actually worked without botnet? For best user experience, of course.
how the fuck do I get umatrix in waterfox
Terrible UI
ultimate proof that javascript is AIDS
so why were so many retards crying about firefox being 'slow' instead of just installing noscript 10 years ago?
I use uBlock origin, does basically the same thing
true
i tried noscript. But I didn't bother learning how to not fuck up every site that i visit. hence i just said meh
don't know what is it with crying over browser speeds though. This only happens when fanfags talk about their favorite software and immediately start screeching at people with different tastes
>mfw staying on FF 56.0.2
>mfw not letting my current add-ons automatically update
>mfw upgraded to 57
>my 3 addons updated to work with it
>it all just werks as usual
>mfw upgraded to 57
>4 of my 15 add-ons updated to work with it
>it's all broken and doesn't werk at all
>having more addons than brain cells
you did this to yourself
Speaking of FF scripts, is there an alternative for YouTube Link Title yet? That shit was the best.
Use umatrix
So at this point, noscript can't do anything that you can't already do with uBO blocking mode? This fucking sucks. I hate how uMatrix and uBO break every site by default and you have to allow scripts to make it useable. How long until NoScript goes back to shutting off Javascript instead of blocking it? Or is that functionality forever gone now?
I really prefer having control over what the processes are for. With extra profiles I can control a lot more and even keep a logical seperation in behaviours. Fingerprinting is still a bit of an issue but thats what the default profile is for.
Why are you using firefox, which fucks everything up all the time, instead of Waterfox, which goes out of its way to support addons?
Old Noscript was superior to uMatrix though, due to it shutting off javascript instead of blocking it. UMatrix, with all its seeming complexity and options, at its core, you still have to allow inline scripts if you want any site to function properly. Which completely defeats the purpose of having all these blocking options. Noscript allowed you to access sites without breaking them, without having to allow any inline scripts. That was an invaluable feature to have, especially in a browser that doesn't allow you to manually disable and enable javascript on a site by site basis.
Why does this say I'm on FF v52?
This. Waterfox is literally Firefox Unfucked. And if you don't need an unfucked Firefox, you're better off on anything other than FF anyway.
There's no reason to use Firefox proper at this point.
At this point in time, the API needed is being discussed. A few hours ago they realized that chromium/chrome actually has an API to disable (instead of blocking) JS.
>bugzilla.mozilla.org
>The chrome.contentSettings.javascript API lets you do that: developer.chrome.com
Also read these bugs It cannot be said when NoScript will work fully again. Mozilla is lazy, it will probably a few months, maybe years.
absolutely this
With so many people using noscript, I would have hoped there was more of an active discussion going on about the lacking ability to disable javascript. But neither Giorgio nor anyone else on the Noscript 10 hackademics blogpost nor the official noscript forum mentions anything about it. They all just talk about the shitty new UI, which IS shitty, but hardly the main issue right now.
There was one guy
>hackademix.net
Why did it take him so long? He had months to prepare for this shit.
but can it run crysis
Probably not: The WebExtension APIs are still missing to launch external applications.
tfw still runnubg 48.0.2 for maxumum debotnet and speed.
Might change to a multithreaded version in the future when they are stable enough.
Block javascript with selective whitelisting, with the intention of blocking malicious scripts.
uBlock Origin basically does the same, but blocks more. I notice a 3x better page loading (on AMD's site, at least) with uBlock Origin enabled. Haven't tested other sites but I assume it would be the same. Honestly Mozilla should just integrate uBO with Firefox.
Either way, uMatrix is in every way superior.
Not like it’s hard to roll one back or it allows 57+ to install
>Double NoScript!
>It blocks JavaScript
>What language is it written in?
>JavaScript
The absolute state of Double NoScript
how do i blacklist only
Ironic.. it could save everything else from Javascript, but not itself
Whats the point of updating browsers, if only security vulnerability youre going to face is via Java. I'm using Firefox 25 on my windows 2000 machine at work. I browse Sup Forums, porn sites, shady porn sites, click random links. Nothing's ever happened to this machine
More like a downgrade version of legacy add-ons version. At this point using umatrix barely has any differences than using this.
Is there any way to get the right click menu back?
Tell me more user. I too had windows 2000 once. Are browser updates truly that much of a meme? I thought html5 required compatible browsers
Can anyone tell me why Noscript is better than umatrix? I've used both but all I can say is that the UI of umatrix is better.
>Nothing's ever happened to this machine
That you know of.
I am sorry, but you have misunderstood me. NoScript is not better (anymore). The new NoScript 10 is missing features because of a limited API. The reason for this is that it uses the same API as uBlock/uMatrix now.
Before FF 57 and NoScript 10 it was actually more usable as a JS blocker because it allowed the so called HTML tags to be rendered by the browser. These are a web standard that has been here for many years that makes many pages usable without JS. If you turn JS off in about:config, you will still get tags, but not anymore from NoScript-addon.
It is not better anymore because it does not do this anymore, just like uMatrix has always done.
Therefore you can stick to uMatrix until Mozilla developers get their arse up and work. (It is not the NoScript developer's fault - well actually he should have made this more clear to the developers IMO. But it sure was not his part to put the API in FF)
Also chromium/chrome has an API to trigger tags. See the post you quoted.
So basically, Chrome is in better condition of having a true NoScript than Firefox?
I'll stick with FF, but holy fuck... J U S T
Yes, it is true. I could not believe this myself. But seriously read bugzilla.mozilla.org
For example one true JS disableing addon for chromium/chrome is
>chrome.google.com
You can test this with no ease in chromium
1.) Install addon in chromium
2.) Go to enable-javascript.com
3.) There is a green box
>Javascript is enabled in your web browser. If you disable JavaScript, this text will change.
4.) Disable JS
5.) There is a red box
>Javascript is disabled in your web browser. If you enable JavaScript, this text will change
in FF however...
1.) Go to enable-javascript.com
2.) There is a green box
>Javascript is enabled in your web browser. If you disable JavaScript, this text will change.
3.) Install or use NoScript 10 or uMatrix or whatever to block JS
4.) NO red box, NO green box.
Yes, but uBlock Origin is much better in Firefox than Chrome. And so is uMatrix.
For a long time the real advantage of Noscript has been XSS/Clickjacking/ABE blocking. The best use case is running Noscript in "allow all globally" mode, and doing everything else in uBlock or uMatrix. What we really need is an addon to step up to the plate and handle those side features exclusively. Of course right now webext Noscript doesn't even handle Clickjacking or ABE, so it's pretty much a bloated XSS blocker if you don't need it as a script firewall.
>Coming soon, in the next few weeks: ClearClick, ABE and a public code repository on Github.
Maybe the Spaghetti delivers.
Like I said, right now. My point was more- Why is this the only addon to effectively tackle that shit, and why has no one forked those features? The new version is fucking awful if that's all you want. You literally can't change any of that in settings now, and you get popups for blocking redirect shit that you can't disable. Even when/if he fixes all of it, it still seems retarded having that kind of blocking available exclusively as a bundled side feature on an addon primarily designed as a firewall.
>no temporary block
this is worst the umatrix
to the trash it goes
webextensions were a mistake
...