Hi Sup Forums, we are anti-NN here right?

Hi Sup Forums, we are anti-NN here right?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=le2R2Ps58pQ
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>Hi Sup Forums, we like getting raped by big ISPs here right?
ftfy

go away Sup Forums

D.A.D.
youtube.com/watch?v=le2R2Ps58pQ

No we don't suck trump's dick on every subject

So you liked getting raped by Silicon Valley fuckers?

You're getting raped by muzzies and all you can do is make forced memes? Fucking euroshit cunts can't even do brexit right.

>get raped by big ISPs
>get raped by Silicon Valley
either way you're getting raped.

Oh look, another fucking Europoor.

the watermark makes it even more fucking hilarious

Old world only internet when?

How is this shit allowed on an SFW board, the amount of Trump dick-sucking here is obscene

>

Das right. Its a whoever wins we lose situation. Soros/Google on one side and ISPs on the other.

>he added too many arrows

can you just nuke silicon valley instead?

I wish

Of course we are. Sup Forums is an Indian board.

>make video criticizing NN
>Banned from youtube the next day

What did Google mean by this?

...

BASED PAJEET PAI

Oh my god it's true!
Holy fuck...

This happened to him before and it turned out to be a glitch. The guy is relatively tame compared to say Sargon or Black Pidgeon Speaks. Wonder what happened.

Anyone who is against net neutrality has never had to deal with Comcast. Fucking pieces of shit I hope everyone in the company dies in a fire.

>mfw I just realized I won't be able to post that after net neutrality is gone

iDubbbz got fucked too.
They are all coming back.

Well, as someone from a country without net neutrality and working free market(every small town has it's own ISP, and in big cities it's even better), here's how we have it:
-every ISP throttles Youtube. Most throttle torrents. There's no option to pay more and stop it. No conspiracy here, they simply understand that it's more cost effective to throttle. And they're already obliged to have the necessary hardware because:
-Governmental censorship. What, you thought NN was responsible for that?
-ISP censorship, as a consequence of the way the governmental censorship is implemented. The government might ban a single page or an image but the ISP is free to ban the entire site to avoid future hassle.

And America has no free market for ISPs. New ISPs can't enter the market because it's already decided who has exclusive rights to make new lines. And all of this began more than a decade before NN. Big companies support NN for themselves, obviously, but they're in the same boat as you - they're ISP customers.

People on Sup Forums made this UNIRONICALLY AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

>everyone I don't like is Sup Forums
sorry sweetie

yeah but the Silicon Valley fucker has a small dick that you barely feel, and the ISP fucked you with your mum's XXL Russian nesting doll collection

fuck off CIA nigger

>careless bandwidth usage
No such thing. Currently ISPs are selling bandwidth they simply don't have and they want us to believe it's NORMAL. Fuck them.

>american ISPs
>losing money in major markets
HAHAHAHAHAHA

Yeah were's our 1980's telecom act money and the fiber it was supposed to pay for by the way?

Comcast user here. Literally no issues. Maybe you should do some research and stop blaming your ISP for when your shitty Wal-Mart brand router overheats transferring 5Mbps files.

No net neutrality means free market and the feds won't control the internet and the free market means more competition. But Sup Forums is full of communists who hate nothing more than a free market they can't control.

>netflix need to paid isp or else
Now instead of competing in """services""" for user, the streaming service will compete in who can bribe the isp most.
And that supposed to be a good thing. The state of mercunts, really.

Net Neutrality exists because there can't be a free market. ISPs have municipal monopolies with and without NN and removing NN only gives them even more leverage.

Trump wants to make america great again by removing anything that creates a monopoly. It'll be a bumpy ride for a while, but communists will get BTFO like always

>No such thing. Currently ISPs are selling bandwidth they simply don't have and they want us to believe it's NORMAL. Fuck them.

> what's oversubscription
> what's a statistical model

and this is supposed to be a fucking technology board

Take down all existing ISPs to create a level playing field for the free market, and I'll consider not supporting NN.

are Sup Forumsacks seriously this retarded? Do you really think that Netflix and Google are going to get "fucked over" by ISPs as punishment for censoring you edgy opinions?

with NN:
>internet companies fuck you over
without NN:
>internet companies still fuck you over
>your ISP fucks you over too

> what's oversubscription
> what's a statistical model
Fancy words for false advertisement.

Shoo shoo communist

>imagine being this much of a fag

Communists are faggots of the highest order

kill yourself

You first, communist

i fucked your mom

Isn't it past your bedtime kid

We live in the age when communists care more about your rights than you do. Let that sink in.

what the fuck emotion is this image supposed to represent?

I can't believe this many people can be convinced to vote against their own best interests. We need another big ISP breakup like we took the Bells down the first time.

Communists have never once cared about your rights, ever.

They do right now. And that's the most absurd thing. But here we are.

>This change will put ISPs back into Bells status
>Bells made Unix
>Unix inspired GNU, Linux, and *BSD
>All those things are fantastic
wtf I hate net neutrality now

Right, like how SJWs, communists, and communist sympathizers like antifa are going full on anti-white right now. They sure care about your rights all right.

Nice goalpost moving.

Yeah, like you even know what they mean

>Communists care about your rights
>However, all these communists who hate whites and white rights don't count, communists still care.

Remember, UNIX was mired in licensing costs and issues. Linux was made in response to the evil that Bell Labs created.

This, except you can avoid getting raped by SV by simply not using their services and blocking ads everywhere.
There is no way to avoid getting raped by your ISP, however.

So if the choice is between getting raped by ISP or SV, I'd pick SV because I don't use their services to begin with, and it wouldn't affect me. Sup Forums and various niche forums are the only social media websites I use.

Exactly.

They care about one right that will affect you. You don't.

WOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOO NET NEUTRALITY ABOUT TO GET REPEALED *dabs on the haters*
>>>>>>>>>>>>PICKLE RICKERS IN THE HOUSE TONIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So where's the third option?

This. If you dont use normie sites then NN is simply better.

worst case schenario bro
normie sites too

ITT: Commies desperate to get rid of NN and cement their monopolies.

This post is unavailable.

You've used up your monthly allotted data available to read posts from this site. Please read posts from Facebook.com or Twitter.com instead if you want more social media. We're providing these sites to you DATA CAP FREE, thanks to net neutrality's repeal.

-ad-
Yorkie doodle binbong. Enjoy the many memes on sponsored these sites, and don't forget to subscribe to the TV package.

>Commies
>monopolies
Is there anything burgers won't blame communists for?

>lets exchange one monopoly for another
>this is somehow progress
Murrimutts are literally the dumbest

I've toyed with the thouggt that ending NN will get people to set up their own networks and connections, and go back to owning parts of the internet themselves, personally, rather than using it as a platform for consumerism. The average person would likely have their own homepage hosted on their PC, and friends would organize their own personal networks. The best thing about this? No more NSA spies. Ending NN would decentralize the internat greatly, and essentially destroy it, which is a good thing.

>what the fuck you can't make bakeries sell wedding cakes to gay couples their business their rules
>REEE YOU CAN'T JUST BAN ME FROM YOUR SERVICE FOR VOICING MY OPINIONS 1st AMENDMENT FREEDOM OF SPEECH

you have to be literally retarded to be against net neutrality unless you're on some ISPs payroll

Coming from the country that invented the world wide web, you guys sure do have shitty internet. What has NN achieved for you faggots since 04?

t. New Zealander posting on a gigabit connection without NN

>>>/dumblr/

Fuck off.
At least most of Europe is white, unlike Amerimuttistan.

Not for long it seems. Soon enough all of western Europe will turn into Muslim caliphates

The first one is bullshit though. Give me one good reason why other people should care what other people do in their bedroom and why any business should not service based on the fact they are gay.

Why should anyone be FORCED to sell something.

It is ridiculous that a business is forced into doing business with someone for ANY reason.

It stops the ISPs from fucking amerimutts even more.
I think datacaps in current year is already a punishment enough.

I love how triggered americans are over this meme. So accurate too.

I'm an idiot so bare with me on his

Net Neutrality rules didn't come into place until Barry forced them in 2015 because of Netflix throttling.

So why do people think things will suddenly becomes data plans and "loot boxes" because rules that have only existed for 2 years are being revoked?

Is everyone just fear-mongering at this point?

Haha yeah! Comcast and Verizon are our friends! They wear the Pepe masks and want to MAGA! They are our greatest ally!


Fuck off, kike.

1. It's only been around since 2015
2. It just stops us from getting fucked harder. It just stops us from being throttled on certain websites other than it has nothing to do with internet speeds
>Europe is white
Kek your kids are already 56 percenters

I'm pretty sure that ISPs are low-key backing up the fear mongering since whenever NN laws get btfo, literally NOTHING the ISPs will do will get even remotely close to what people are speculating they will do, so normies (aswell as many anons) will let that pass.
It's important that, while NN laws were for the worse and their dissolvement is for the better, we remain critical of what ISPs do no matter how insignificant these actions may be.
Don't forget that in any market, everyone is out for gain and it is up to the consumer to keep said companies in check

>oi u cheeky wanker
lost

We are for net neutrality in preventing ISPs from giving preferential treatment to their own services over competition. For example they partner with Hulu and decide to speed up that connection only in the hopes you will switch from Netflix.

We are also against throttling connections/monitoring what you do. So say you game a lot/watch a lot of porn. Your ISP shouldn't collect that information or decide you need to pay extra because of what you're using that bandwidth for.


We also don't like data caps and overage charges. You already deal with that crap on your cell phone.

The big divide is actually over the other crap they shoehorned into the bill. Consumer Protection is what Sup Forums wants, the difference is how we're getting fucked by the legislation in the long run.

That particular case involved employees of the bakery being at the wedding to deliver/arrange the cakes, which is what they took issue with. They even offered to sell a cake, just didn't want to cater the wedding.