Hello fellow 4Channers from /G, remember that Sup Forums has always been pro-NN. By the way, Google is botnet...

Hello fellow 4Channers from /G, remember that Sup Forums has always been pro-NN. By the way, Google is botnet, please sign this petition funded by Google!

Other urls found in this thread:

warosu.org/g/thread/S63523404#p63531781
twitter.com/AnonBabble

What is your argument against NN?

kek, fukken saved

Sup Forums supports it because anti-Trump liberals and redittors try to make it out like it's a huge deal when it's really just rolling back an awkward and ambiguous law that was instated like 2 years ago.

Personally, I find the law too awkward and ambiguous to feel one way or another about its instatement or repeal.

The law was made explicitly to prevent shady deals between ISPs and sites which started popping up. I don't mind if the law is replaced by something better, but removing it only makes things worse.

>The law was made explicitly to prevent shady deals between ISPs and sites which started popping up

It's actually sad to see all these obvious shills. You know, often it's hard to tell, like with the Windows 10 shills. There's a significant number of people that actually use Windows 10, so it's hard to tell apart the shills and the real people. Or maybe there are no shills to begin with? Who knows.
But in this thread and the other Net Neutrality threads, it's painfully obvious that y'all are getting paid by Verizon. Because there is no way in hell that ANYBODY on Sup Forums would want to repel Net Neutrality. It just makes NO sense whatsover, you shills should go on Facebook or 9gag instead, where people might actually fall for it.

f-f-ff-fake news

besides if that works is because most people are severely misinformed in the subject (and either supporting or going against net neutrality anyways). If you ever wonder why everyone isn't holding hands and singing "we love NN" don't look at corporations, look at pro NN people that are doing their best not to be informed while at the same time try to push people to promote the message, which turns many away (of which are also misinformed). This is pure politics and you need a good spokesman, less pressure and less retards on your side if you want to win.

Sup Forums has a lot of tech illiterate Sup Forumsermins and Sup Forumstards crossboarders

arnold DUMPFler deleting the interent

Y’all notice how a bunch of people that would near crucify you for “micro aggressions” have suddenly embraced anti-Indian racism and are handing out permission slips to hate brown bodies all of a sudden? Pretty weird...

Both pro-NN and anti-NN are wrong, as on a healthy ISP market, it would be a non-issue.
And by anti-NN i mean pajeets like you, paid by comcast or google.

*upvotes*

Yeeeeah the law wouldn't matter so much if there weren't a handful of ISPs controlling ALL of the internet services for the entirety of the United States. The whole, "let the market decide" thing doesn't really work when you have a service monopoly. Yes, ISPs are monopolies since it is a well known fact that these companies are a cartel that work with each other in dividing up service areas as to not step on each others profits.

To make matters worse, it isn't even possible for a new ISP to be started without billions in start up capital and decades of time. This is because the major ISP players own ALL of the cable infrastructure and piping. Have the capital and want to lay your own lines? Tough, they'll either bribe local government to be against digging new lines or they will just sue you and hold up your development for years and years. Why do you think Google Fiber has taken so long to spread? Why do you think it only announces future planned locatioms and even then the estimates are years and years out? And thats Google of all companies running into this bullshit.

No I haven't noticed its all in your fat fucking head.

Y’all wouldn’t be class shaming me now would ya? Not very progressive. I’m fixin to send your ass to the gulag if you don’t quit pitchin such a fit.

0.01₽ have been deposited to your account Vlad.

Sup Forums was pro-net neutrality when it first came up.
I bet you just don't remember things from some three years ago.
Because you were on reddit at the time and only got here after being 'redpilled' in the last election and now you must oppose literally everything reddit does even if they were curing cancer and reversing entropy because you don't want anyone her to know about your shameful past.

>big time oldfag guis been here all three summers!!!!

Oh wait, it's just you.

Anyone got anything?

you're all three

That FCC gave up its rights in 2015 to oversee ISPs

It's either free market bullshit forgetting that the market is far too corrupt to be free in any sense or it's government control forgetting that there isn't a definitive line between government and big corporations in the US and that the entire telecom field was funded and started by the government for the sake of information warfare.

Or it's calling your opposition reddit. Mostly it's that.

...

brainlet here, from my very limited understanding no matter what happens with NN the average consumer won't notice a different correct? If anything it's ISPs fighting with big streaming services or something?

>the average consumer won't notice a different correct
correct
> If anything it's ISPs fighting with big streaming services or something?
correct

Remember, Google supports FOSS.
Please start using proprietary software only.

>android
>FOSS

android itself is, GApps that google forces on manufactuerers isn't

who /dontgiveahoothere/ ?

Y-yeah goy, it won't be used to fuck over the average Joe, they'll go after the big services with all the power and the top lawyers...

That any retarded dumbass that actually believes the same corporations that purge even basic bitch right-wing normies genuinely believes in neutrality and free speech is a REDDITOR WEEDMAN.

>vague argument
>nothing specific about how this one specific legislation can be used for the specific purpose of eroding the rights of man
I bet you think that traffic rules are fascism as well.

...

>posting on Sup Forums down
>shit up Sup Forums instead
I apologize to other Sup Forums boards that will have to see shit threads like this. They get paid per post.

you are a total fucking moron

Sorry. Did I ruin your shitty thread?
Go make another 18 threads about NN on Sup Forums again.
Oh wait you cant because posting is down.

>Oh wait you cant because posting is down.

I wonder (((((((((((((((((((((((WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) culd be behind that.

If reddit makes a mistake it is that it focuses too much on cost or power. The bigger issue to me is that net neutrality is not only stopping ISPs from throttling and blocking websites for anti-competitive reasons, but also for political reasons as well. This could place sites in danger that are not politically correct, or are criticizing a company, or campaigning for or against a particular candidate.

>reddit, a private company should be regulated to free speech
>net neutrality is baaaad

if isp domination is the problem then why isnt reddit fighting agints isp lobbyists.

net neutrality repeal would be fucking amazing if we got rid of lobbyist faggots

but no, net neutrality is more important than that

>prohibit blocking any site for any reason, including political
>somehow, it poses a danger for political sites
I don't get it

Those companies support net neutrality because it benefits them. That doesn’t automatically make it bad or something. The fact that social media giants censor their users is a separate issue that has nothing to do with net neutrality.

they got your healthcare, now they want your internet to be taxed to shit and back and decide which content you see or don't see and like lemmings jumping off of a cliff with glee you agree it is a good "plan". Fucking Kys.

Why should I have to pay $69 a month to Comcast just so Tyrone can watch UHD 4K GoT on Netflix rather than be at work?

>Because there is no way in hell that ANYBODY on Sup Forums would want to repel Net Neutrality

I do.

Perhaps you should go back?

Literally what does that have to do with net neutrality? Are you fucking retarded?

If you don’t need to stream then buy a slower internet plan. If Tyrone is paying $69 a month for 100 mbps then he should be able to use that on whatever he wants. If Tyrone is using your wifi then learn to use a password.

>phoneposter file name
>implying you’re not just some reddit transplant who came during last year’s election
his point still stands

>If Tyrone is paying $69 a month for 100 mbps then he should be able to use that on whatever he wants.

I’m glad the FCC doesn’t agree with you you fucking cuck.

>your
yet another foreigner trying to meddle in our domestic affairs

You’re glad that people don’t get to use the bandwidth they paid for? How does repealing net neutrality benefit your situation with Tyrone at all you mouth breathing mong?

I have to pay more for my internet because niggers use to much. I would gladly pay $30 to access all the sites I use than be forced to pay double that because of Netflix watching coons. It’s not hard to understand.

I bet you’re a socialised healthcare cuck too.

>wanting metered internet
lmao, you're the real cuck here
If all you're accessing are your stupid normie sites then feel free to pay for a slower speed

i wonder who could be behind this post

>I have to pay more for my internet because niggers use to much.
Except that’s wrong and that’s not how it works. If you don’t need to watch Netflix then get a plan with lower bandwidth. If you pay for 100/10 mbps then it doesn’t matter what you’re using it on. Don’t believe this meme that niggers watching Netflix are making your internet cost more.

>thinking the internet is a magical river

It costs money to maintain infrastructure. Paying for what you use is the best system.

Yeah I wonder (((who))) could be behind the recent push against net neutrality. It’s not like any kikes benefit from it being repealed or anything

>Don’t believe this meme that niggers watching Netflix are making your internet cost more.

Except it fundamentally is. Half of Comcast’s bandwidth goes to Netflix.

>half of the bandwith both netflix and its consumers paid for goes to netflix
What's wrong with that?

>paid for product
>use it as marketed
>no you commie don't use it, the corporation is suffering
Absolute state of Sup Forums.

Which why you should be buying a slower plan, you stupid nigger. If you don't need high bandwidth, then don't buy high bandwidth. He pays for 100mbps because he needs that 100mbps for his netflix binge. You, on the other hand, are a stupid nigger that is paying for 100mbps when a 10mbps connection would be more than enough for receiving those company emails.

I hope the anti NN laws will pass so this place will shut down for good. Me and the other euros will just move to krautchan, where no murrishits will be seen again with their retarded opinions and politics, since your ISPs will throttle/ban it for you.

So? If comcast is stupid enough to sell a service that they can't provide, it's fundamentally their fault. They shouldn't be selling a service that they can't sustain in the first place.

>what is latency
have fun taking almost a second to load a 1 MB webpage

Latency is different from absolute network speed, you fucking retard. Why the fuck, do you think, are they measured differently in the first place? It doesn't matter how fast my plan is if my ISP is retarded enough to route my traffic through hong kong before arriving in the UK.

People tend to think it's easier to influence politics into changing the law than fighting against corporations. Except the former and the latter go hand in hand, lel.

>Comcast is short of money and can't invest into any infrastructure until Jewtube pays them.
You're meant to believe.

And what does no NN help there?

Comcast already makes a ton of profit.
How much of that is getting invested in improving the infrastructure?

kill yourself tech illiterate retard

keep thinking web apps will take off. any day now

>no argument
>calls me tech illiterate when he can't even distinguish bandwidth from latency

i'm obviously not just talking about ping you pathetic shill

with a 10 mbit connection it will take almost a second to load a 1 MB web page/etc regardless of your 'latency'

Oh look, Reddit is here.

and you're complaining about 1fucking second?
You don't need that 100mbps, you fucking retard. Your retarded little webpage would finish loading before your bandwidth is fully saturated. You're literally paying for shit you don't use so stop complaining about your expensive bill.

warosu.org/g/thread/S63523404#p63531781

>I have to do the exact opposite of everything reddit does, no matter what
Stop trying so hard to fit in.

Oh look, the shill doesn’t have an argument

>being so much of a contrarian that you're willing to take a bunch of cacti up your ass just to argue with another person

Let see I had understand.
Sup Forums trolling for end NN but doing nothing against FCC as a whole or telecoms? Also, are blaming the NN for the Daily Stromer had to be shut down instead of TOS of the DNS company?

10 mbit is pig slow for fuck's sake. keep shilling your slow as shit javascript webapps

that feel when living in a country with a real net neutrality law and reading all those american retards who at both sides are totally wrong and they don't even see it

Stop arguing in favor of internet tier packages you ISP shills, I should and WILL CONTINUE to be able to access every single website on the internet for one flat price. There's literally no reason for you argue against access to every site unless your a fucking Jew.

You're the retard here that's complaining about the high price of faster speeds. You should be the one shilling for bloated webapps since cheaper fast internet is going to make them more accessible. They weren't even part of the argument in the first place. You brought them up out of nowhere because you have literally no fucking argument. Stop paying for shit you don't need, you fucking retard. If you're not paying for netflix or torrenting or anything like that then you have NOTHING to saturate the internet. You have NOTHING that warrants or justifies paying for a 100mbps connection.

Can someone explain to me how this got turned into a left/right issue? I have a suspicion it's because americans are utterly incapable of nuanced thinking but it seems like it was forced into one.

fucking retard, webshit is always slow, waiting several seconds for something to respond is never acceptable.100 mbps is cheap as hell anyway you stupid amerimutt

>it's because americans are utterly incapable of thinking
fixed that for you senpai

guberment regulations are for commies!
legalize child labor!

>complain about expensive internet
>get btfo because retarded
>"w-well it wasn't even expensive in the first place"
also, the responsiveness of your link-clocking depends more on latency, you autismo. If it doesn't start loading the webpage and is stuck on waiting for the server to reply then it's latency that's the problem, not uour internet speed
>amerimutt
>implying I am
>implying you aren't

NN imposes even more government regulation in an already non-free market
You probably know each and every one of my arguments by now. If you don't, please do ask me to elaborate

you're an absolute fucking moron

no one cares how long it takes to START loading something, it's about how long it takes to FINISH loading it, except if you're streaming like netflix (you don't need 100mbps at all for netflix you insufferable pathetic retard)

fuck off back to Sup Forums

That's not an argument.
Just because you're some retarded ancap doesn't mean you don't have to reason why a specific regulation is bad.

Can't wait for amerimutt Sup Forumsddit rednecks to be removed from the internet, literally anything will improve.

you don't need 100mbps at all for netflix you insufferable pathetic retard
Congratulations, you fucking moron, you just played yourself. A while ago, you complained about about netflix users making your internet expensive because they're taking up most of it. Now you're implying that they aren't even saturating their bandwidth which means they aren't even taking up the traffic that you were implying they were. You're just a retard that keeps flip-flopping between different arguments just so you could say to yourself that you've managed to "own" someone on the internet.

top kek

Ok I have just one question.
So America is a democracy or a republic or whatever.
So it stands to reason that if you want to pass a law, that law must be in the interest of natural people.
Now, WHO are those natural people that DON'T WANT net neutrality?
Literally WHO?
WHO
and don't tell me it's the CEO of verizon, because he is not people, he is just a greedy jew

Jeez dude, go easy on the guy.

I cannot understand the pro NN arguments either. I think they're just pulling it out of their asses.

It's always some vague reference to government regulation automatically being bad without any further elaboration.

FUCKING RETARD KILL YOURSELF FUCKING MORON YOU'RE NOT WORTH MY TIME HERE'S YOUR LAST (YOU) PATHETIC RETARD SHILL