>the irony when the War on Terror created more terror
The irony when the War on Terror created more terror
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
thanks murica
Welcome Ivan
thanks murica
2003 never forget
How is that ironic?
When you start a war on something it's going to fight back.
And our oil isn't cheaper.
So terror rates in the western world dramatically decreased and we exported it to shitskin nations to give them a taste of their own medicine, only brown people will find fault with this
>more arabs and niggers dying
>a bad thing
It means it failed, Nige'.
The only western terror attack that is shown here is 2001's attack. So before you melted your steel beams nobody was dying, after you did it-shitskins started dying.
Welcome
You're welcome
HAHAHAHAHA HEHEHEHEHEHEHE
P
What? Armies of states faught back. Not fucking Islamists blowing up their own people.
[citation needed]
2000 had 0 Western terror deaths. 2014 had 700.
The war was started by TERRORISM on 9/11.
Our goal was to defeat TERRORISM.
In 2014, TERRORISM killed 40,000+ people. In 2001 it killed 3000.
Hence, more TERRORISM.
Usually when you defeat a national army the civilians don't pick up weapons in the name of jihad, form terror cells, and pledge allegiance to Al-Qaeda/ISIS.
So it is ironic.
Guess what the War of Drugs did?
Thanks America (and Tony Blair).
Drugs
And the Australian dude Howard.
National army =/= Bunch of terrorist cells in bumfuck nowhere, Middle East
>dat 9/11 bump
:^)
en.m.wikipedia.org
Are you fucking retarded?
...
>Terror Attack in US
>US starts wars and destabilizes governments all over Middle East and south Asia EXCEPT where the terrorists were actually from
>People surprised that after a dozen years of chaos that terrorism is on the rise
I'm sure glad gasoline is cheap.