Compression game!

Try and compress images as much as you possibly can.

...

Sup Forums's lazy

...

...

Points to whoever can get a file in the bytes

...

how the fuck did you do that? I am using jpgoptim from the cli. i cant get under 1kb

Literary ripped out half of the binary data.

How? Can jpgoptim do this?

Any hex editor. Well basically even ASCII text editor can do that.

...

reminded me of terry. i hope he's doing okay

Used vim with xxd, did :X but now I cant view it jej

...

...

He's doing perfectly fine!

...

i've got some bad, but potentially hilarious, news y for you

please share

gib

...

...

how do I do this?

...

...

should be 640x480

he's on the lamb livestreaming from his van you idiots lol. as enjoyable and meme-rich his livestreams are, he's still on borrowed time.

He'll do a better job of explaining, but I'll summarize what I know.
He got kicked out of the house and lives in a van
He became obsessed with some youtube chick and masturbated to her whilst pretending that he was in a cuckolding relationship with her or some shit.
He has masturbated/stripped on stream
He was on the run from the police
He apparently got arrested for battery.
And somehow he got out and then got laid?
There's probably more and I probably left out some details but that's what I understand of it.

Represent image as number than find a way to represent that number as a X pow Y or something else and than you have 5B img

...

sucks
can't view fullscreen on my TembleOS machine

...

...

...

...

Upscaled, then compressed.

its pretty fucking pointless to post the an image 200 bytes smaller. just take all the colors away already

thanks for my new profile pic

...

sure thing buddy

I'm not your buddy guy

thread from over a year ago maybe two, had them in the dozens of bytes.
try harder.

That is some real BS

...

...

...

...

Hello, this is the original

This is compressed.

...

Heard he got syphilis from that old hobo

At this point you might as well just have ascii art
(hint hint)

Do not play god

...

is this now the sjis thread?

I_tried.png

Does anyone have the 4 color file of Costanza that got down to like 40 bytes

You guys seem to be experts on this. How can I shrink my porn pictures collection? I know there are many programs and I use FastStoneResizer to shrink very big (>5MB) pictures but im asking for the most optimal settings for batch converting it all (1.3TB)

I made this LARGE picture for you.

...

>fapping to jpg artifacts

you're a big pic

try it faggot

...

nice

Videos take too much space. I typically keep the resolution the same and just lower the quality to 70%. Doesn't hurt the image quality much.

Terry is like a much more tragic version of Chris Chan. I just want him to be okay. He didn't deserve anything that's happening to him.

Let me retry this, but with no sanity or care for quality.

wew

...

I did it!

Nice!

JUST
LIKE
THAT

The smallest image I can make with GIMP is a 1 pixel square image, with 1bit indexed color, exported as "raw data" image.
The output is a .data file of five bits size. not five bytes, but five fucking BITS.

SWING
YOUR ARMS
FROM
SIDE
TO
SIDE

...

screen 13:for a=0 t0 15:color a:pset(a+100,a+100):draw"u20r20d20l20":next

73 bytes

IMPRESSIVE

There is no file system that would let you have a file less than one byte. To say nothing of metadata. Also a single pixel takes up a minimum of 3 bytes just to store the color information, so no that did not happen.

I'm guessing you mistook bytes for bits. You could theoretically store a 1 pixel image in 5 bytes in a raw format. 2 bytes for the width dimension and 3 bytes for the first pixel. But you said indexed color which requires additional overhead to store the palette.

...

That's the same size?

Most file systems don't allow you to have a file with less than a cluster of size (4KB on NTFS/Fat, min 1KB on EXT3)

A NUUUUUU

for you

Windows says it's 1 byte
du without options says it's "5"
du -b and du --apparent-size says it's 1
So yes, the file is one byte on the filesystem, but the actual data is likely 5 bits

>Also a single pixel takes up a minimum of 3 bytes just to store the color information
>indexed 1 bit

>But you said indexed color which requires additional overhead to store the palette.
the "raw data" does't seems to have any palette or header. And "black and white" doesn't really need palette

pic related is when I open the file with and hex editor

I love how this somehow manages to be a gradient even though it's 2x2

5 bits used in reality, 1 byte used according to the size market on the file table, but using 4096 bytes, where 4095 are ((empty))

du reports bytes not bits. I'm not aware of any file systems that keep track of fractions of bytes.
Show the file in a hex editor. Is that what that is? Because I just see two 0s which is nonsense. A single null byte. Does anything actually open that file?

>the "raw data" does't seems to have any palette or header. And "black and white" doesn't really need palette
Any sane format would use at least 2 bytes to store the dimensions of the image and another byte to represent the color depth and stuff (otherwise how does it know it's supposed to be in monochrome?) And then a byte for the pixel itself. Bitpacking exists, but I doubt it would be used in this context and it's all 0's anyways.

Your browser upscales it, there is no gradient in the actual image.

>Any sane format
this doesn't looks like a sane format