>haha people still buy cpu, my 2500k is almost sam-
Haha people still buy cpu, my 2500k is almost sam-
>No HairWorks
Unplayable.
>over 60fps
it's enough
fuck off manchild
Looks more like a memory issue than with the processor.
74 FPS 6 years or so after the 2500k released.
I used to ague in build threads that the 2500k was retarded for a lower end to mid range PC gaming PC.
People would sperg out when anyone suggested that chip didn't belong in literally every build.
I feel pretty vindicated seeing how retardedly overpowered that chip was in hindsight
Half the performance is good.
Still playable.
You have to be a pajeet shilling. There's literally no reason to 'upgrade', may be in two years...
/thread
>still playable
at sub 100 fps? I dont think so
>4.2GHz
I thought most people ran 4.5+ easily back in the day?
90% of people don't have a high freq monitor
like 50% still uses 1024x768
just look at steam stats. the world is extremely poor, and you are an entitled manchild
>under 144hz
Why do you need more than 60 fps you manchild?
You only need 60 for it to be playable.
for about $40.......not bad
What's the point of that ?
>b-b-but the hair physics user
Stop this shilling I don't care if the dragons have fluffy furs or something.
>like 50% still uses 1024x768
thats completely false though.
These screens are faked one way another, because [email protected], RAM@1600MHz gives 30 frames more.
Or maybe not: memory frequencies higher than 1600MHz (maximum supported of Sandy Bridge) are actually detrimental. On DDR4 - at least on Haswell-E - it seems to be other way around.
It makes the sex mods so much better.
i meant 1366x768, my bad. yeah it's an exaggeration but made my point
>i meant 1366x768
thats still completely wrong. over 70% already use 1080p.
>not using 1440x900