GNU/Linux /minimalism/ thread

Old thread: For suggestions on programs that aren't bloat refer to suckless.org/rocks

Acceptable GNU/Linux distributions that aren't bloat

>Gentoo
gentoo.org/downloads/

>Debian(NET ISO)
debian.org/CD/netinst/

>Void(Hipster but werks)
repo.voidlinux.eu/live/current/

>Alpine(Pretty damn minimal)
alpinelinux.org/downloads/

Another protip to keep your system minimal is to keep your package count lower than 999.

Get recommendations to see if your system is bloat or not

>OS
>DE/WM
>Video/Music player
>Image viewer
>File Manager
>Text Editor
>Shell
>Web Browser
>Terminal

Protip: If you aren't comfortable with the terminal or aren't proficient with GNU/Linux this thread isn't for you.

A nice quote
"Minimalism = A very good thing"
Too much of something is never good."

Archived Threads:
warosu.org/g/thread/S63337512

warosu.org/g/thread/S63371154

warosu.org/g/thread/S63659043

Other urls found in this thread:

wiki.debian.org/ReduceDebian
github.com/ranger/ranger/wiki/Image-Previews
wiki.debian.org/Dwm
qtile.org/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>Windows 10
>Explorer
>Paint
>Media Player
>Visual Studio Code
>Edge
>Powershell

the irony is that everything in your image is not minimal except dwm, feh, rc and st/urxvt

suggestions?

OS: Slackware
WM: dwm, 9wm
Music/Video Player: mplayer (without GUI)
Image Viewer: feh
File Manager: none
Text Editor: sam or acme, nvi
Shell: rc
Web Browser: surf, uzbl
Terminal: st or urxvt

This, but unironically.

Reposting benchmark

what's wrong with mpv?

Bump

You fucking nigger. This thread is called GNU/Linux /minimalism/ thread

>mpv
>python dependencies

What about ffplay then? Doesn't gentoo use the python language for their package manager

Not sure what you mean with ffplay, but mpv now ships with its own version of ffmpeg. Anyway, I hope they have luck, I know everybody is saying mpv is dead but that's just a meme.

As for gentoo, not everybody uses that or any python based package manager. For various reasons but using python is one of them. Look at Exherbo.

What's the most basic video player on gnu/linux? I think ffplay is

Yeah, ffplay, but mplayer is damn good and the reason I personally use it is because it works on the framebuffer so I can watch movies on my server connected to my Tv through an HDMI any time I want. I use to have kodi-fb (the framebuffer version) just for that.

>OS
Several really, not in the mood of shilling rn
>DE/WM
Ratpoison (because keybinds, I need these keybinds)
>Video/Music player
MOC, mplayer
>Image viewer
sxiv, just try this, it can do GIF
>File Manager
ranger (waiting for other text based file manager with image previews), but I also use spacefm, smaller than thunar or pcman and more options
>Text Editor
Vim, but waiting for a Vi-like keys Zile
>Shell
Bash, because I know about inputrc and the readline
>Web Browser
Firefox but slowly migrating to an alternative
>Terminal
Xterm

>Image Viewer: feh
gif? svg?

You forgot lfs

"Minimalism = A very good thing"
Too much of something is never good."

>OS
Gentoo
>DE/WM
Openbox + Compton
>Video/Music player
VLC, Audacious
>Image viewer
feh, gifview
>File Manager
PCmanFM
>Text Editor
Notepadqq
>Shell
bash
>Web Browser
Google Chrome, links (console only)
>Terminal
terminator

Has anyone followed this guide? If so, post your desktops.

Which guide?

I feel like this list has a lot of unique options for WM, and provides a lot of cool stuff to try out. Has anyone used any of these WMs, especially the more obscure ones?

I've been using FrankenWM for a little bit now. It's very lightweight and comfy, and apparently is super minimal in terms of ram usage according to the list. It's got kind of a mix of awesome and dwm ideas in there, so it has various tiling presets that you can swap between, but the configuration happens in C in the header file instead of Lua. The config is well-commented so you can easily understand what does what.

only issue is that I can't seem to get a bar to work on it. I tried tint2, but it wouldn't show running applications from different workspaces unless I was actually looking at them. If I wasn't on a workspace, it's like those applications didn't exist to tint2.

But aside from the bar issues, everything was super smooth, so if you have a bar that works with it (maybe polybar would work?), or you don't really use/need a bar in the first place, then give it a go!

OP's pic

>I've been using FrankenWM for a little bit now. It's very lightweight and comfy.
Screenshot

Here's mine from last thread. The package count is a bit bloaty because I didn't RTFM and see this
wiki.debian.org/ReduceDebian

but there you go. I also had a browser playing a jewtube video in the background, which explains the ram. It's normally like 135MB without the browser.

github.com/ranger/ranger/wiki/Image-Previews

Has video preview as well

Fuck forgot the pic

Oh it's you. I wanted to know if any other anons followed the minimal guide.

Is franken maintained? Also do you think it's better than dwm?

>Debian
>2bwm
>n/a (mostly deaf)
>feh
>ranger
>vim
>bash
>firefox
>xterm

>mostly deaf
I'm sorry to hear that user. Hope you are doing well.

>mostly deaf
Hope you are doing well :(

I'm not sure on whether it's maintained or not, but i guess not. There was a commit earlier this year, but nothing since. I guess if you subscribe to the idea that "It's not dead. It's just finished" then this shouldn't be a big deal. DWM hasn't had a release in 2 years anyway.

As far as better, I don't actually have much experience with dwm other than knowing it's suckless and has the whole "recompile to reconfigure" thing. However, if we're going by which one is more minimal, dwm's code is more minimal (by about 1000 or so lines), but going by the above benchmark, franken is more ram-efficient.

>virtual box
Do it on real hardware.

really wish I had the opportunity to do so.
Although if I do get the chance, it will likely be with a systemdless distro.

Has anyone decided to compile firefox from source to make it as minimal as possible? Is it possible to get it to run in a frame buffer?

>OS
Void
>DE/WM
bspwm
>Video/Music player
mpv, mpd+ncmpcpp
>Image viewer
feh
>File Manager
spacefm, shell
>Text Editor
Vis
>Shell
mksh
>Web Browser
FF Beta
>Terminal
alacritty
>Torrent
ruTorrent

>whole "recompile to reconfigure" thing.
I think once you compile it, you're done


wiki.debian.org/Dwm

dwm was designed to be ultra minimalist, less than 2,000 lines of code. It really is done and only time new release comes out is for bug fixes if they're found

>Is it possible to get it to run in a frame buffer?
That would solve a lot of problems for me.

Did you actually read the page you sent me?
>dwm is configured by modifying its source code and recompiling the binary
I mean it's a quick process but still.

Yeah that seems to be the case for both.

when comparing the minimalism of these two WMs I guess it depends on whether you value RAM-efficiency or LOC.

Yeah, it's like 4 commands.

what about qtile?

qtile.org/

>written and configured in Python
Yeah I don't know how that would compare.

I was born with it. Doesn't bother me. Thanks for the (you)s though.

>OS
Debian
>DE/WM
GNOME
>Video/Music player
mpv, clememtine
>Image viewer
Ristretto
>File Manager
Nautilus
>Text Editor
Emacs
>Shell
bash
>Web Browser
Firefox ESR
>Terminal
GNOME terminal

user this isn't very minimal

>I literally just finished installing Debian on my machine: the post

Not minimal at all

Redpill me on termite vs urxvt

>void
>hipster

>OS
16.04.1-Ubuntu
>DE/WM
?
>Video/Music player
17
>Image viewer
8
>File Manager
3
>Text Editor
several
>Shell
numerous
>Web Browser
3
>Terminal
1

2536 packages

...

>OS
NixOS
>DE/WM
XFCE
>Video/Music player
mpv, mpd
>Image viewer
feh
>File Manager
Terminal
>Text Editor
Vim
>Shell
bash
>Web Browser
Firefox 57, links
>Terminal
Konsole

>implying

Do you even know what hipster even means, fucking reddit

Why slackware

Where is xmonad ?

Why Konsole?

can someone confirm or deny that you can actually pick each individual package by hand with debian netinstall?

If you need a graphical environment you're not minimalist.

>>OS
Manjaro
>>DE/WM
I3wm
>>Video/Music player
mpv
>>Image viewer
Feh
>>File Manager
Mostly ranger sometimes thunar
>>Text Editor
Vim
>>Shell
zsh
>>Web Browser
FF since 57 is pretty fast. Waterfox before that
>>Terminal
Urxvt

Thinking about ditching the minimalist deal for gnome. I tried the newest version out recently and started to learn the key bindings for navigating through windows/workspaces. Seems like it has potential. So retarded they use that GJS spidermonkey bullshit otherwise there would be so much more extensions. Besides that I really don't get all the hate for gnome.

>OS
Manjaro
> DE/WM
PCManFM/Openbox
>Image Viewer
Feh
>File Manager
PCManFM and terminal
> Text editor
I am/have migrated to VSCode
> Shell
zsh
>Web Browser
Firefox 57.
> Terminal
urxvt-tabbed

If I wasn't so incompetent it would be a bit more minimal, too, I guess, but...

Hey, that's really cute, it looks like one those of mini dvd players, how des it work exactly?

what do you mean lol

you can install or not install whatever packages you want, obviously you will have to install dependencies in many cases

No arch here?

It's an OLPC.

bloated shit

No mention of the Qupzilla browser? It's way more lightweight than Firefox, it's what I use on my single core laptop. It has a built it adblocker too. The only thing that missing is Noscript style functionality, which makes me a bit uneasy. Still, it's by far the best browser I've used on older computers considering its features.

How do i get truly minimal install of Slackware? I've followed the instructions but still got about 1 Gb used without X. What am I doing wrong?

>OS
Arch Linux customized without systemd and critical packages (graphics, audio, base-devel) compiled by me with features I need/use using Clear Linux optimization flags.
(Thanks to the Arch Build System and AUR.)

> Package count ( pacman -Q |wc -l )
1090

>DE/WM
dwm + rofi (rofi is a minimal program menu I use instead of dmenu)

>Video/Music player
mpv (for both)

>Image viewer
sxiv ( feh for static wallpaper)

>File Manager
ranger with image, .zip and .rar file preview | OR plain command line most times

>Text Editor
vim

>Shell
bash

>Web Browser
firefox (it sucks but no other choice available yet)

> Terminal
ROXTerm (can do everything and, at 1.5 MB never had a problem with it.)

>RootFS information and size ( I have steam installed to play TF2 / Counter Strike)
Size Used Avail Use%
30G 10G 20G 34%

Let's keep minimalist threads going Sup Forums needs them!

Not him, but I woudl agree.
Slackware is pretty minimalistic because it's really just plain linux.
No "Debian-like linux", no "Arch way", no fancy shmancy. Just a Kernel, Lilo and a bunch of packages. And if you use Slack for a while you will probably know very well which packages are on your computer and what they do.

What's the minimal way of writing documents?

OS: Arch
WM: Awesome
Mu/Vid: Audacious/MPV
Img: Feh/Geeqie
FM: Pcmanfm
Text: Vim
Shell: Bash
Browser: QuteBrowser
Term: Sakura

echo "to be or not to be" > hamlet && echo "that's the question" >> hamlet

When we are arguing between 300kb and 26 mb instead of the gigabytes of Gnome and KDE, I don't think we have much to argue about, there has to be a point where we stop and take a look at our lives and ask if this is what we truly wanted when we descended from the pleroma.

woke: using software with as few features as is comfortable for you and keeping things practical by not drowning yourself in useless options and features
broke: autistically crippling yourself by purposefully using very basic software lacking features that would be useful to you

I think the cutoff should she "can it run comfortably on an SoC like a Pi or a Beaglebone?"

What would you gentlemen sugest running on a netbook with only 1gb ram? Would be used for some video,youtube,shitposting and multiple game emulators.

I agree, I understand people wanting lightness, I use wm, I like making my own system. But its when we get to autistic levels that my eyebrow raises.

But, I guess without those autists we wouldn't know how far we can push our systems, and their sacrifice has been my gain over the years.

In what universe isn't firefox bloat?

Sounds good, I'll try it out.
Thanks

>OS
Debian (!#++)
>DE/WM
Openbox
>Video/Music player
VLC, Moc, youtubeviewer
>Image viewer
feh
>File Manager
ranger
>Text Editor
nano
>Shell
bash
>Web Browser
firefox , w3m for text
>Terminal
xterm

I'm running a minimal Debian installation on my netbook (one of those cheap N270 Atoms). It works surpisingly well, I can play HD video with mplayer and SNES era consoles emulate well. Playstation emulation is pushing it but it still works. Big browsers like Firefox and Chrome are quite slow, so you'll have to settle for smaller browsers like Qutebrowser/Qupzilla/Netsurf.

Why would anyone here unironically use xterm over urxvt or st?

>OS
NetBSD
>DE/WM
i3
>Video/Music player
mpv
>Image viewer
feh
>File Manager
spacefm
>Text Editor
Emacs
>Shell
sh
>Web Browser
Furryfucks
>Terminal
xterm

>Why would anyone here unironically use xterm over st?
Proper delete button functionality

>OS
Arch
>WM
i3 (gaps)
>Image viewer
feh
>File Manager
Ranger
>Text editor
Nano for quick changes, vim for latex etc
>Shell
Fish
>Web browser
Ungoogled Chromium
>Terminal
Termite

>OS
Ubuntu 17.10
WM
Gnome
>Image viewer
Image viewer
>File manager
Dolphin
>Text Editor
Nano
>Shell
Gnome-shell
>Web browser
Chromium/Nightly
>Terminal
Gnome-terminal

I can hear your screams already.

Can you elaborate on that?
Also, doesn't the tragically reduced speed of output bother you? I mean, if you have a big output, in lines count, it will take forever to print them all.
Or is there an option to change it during compilation?

Thanks already tried a few. Lakka works amazingly well for emulators but does nothing else. Mint was probably easiest to use. Lubuntu was average but didnt like networking with windows PCs at all. Manjaro is my current attempt and will look into deb minimal if that ends poorly too.

>debian (NET ISO)
REEEEE fucking normies not understanding how installers work

>OS
Gentoo
>DE/WM
awesome
>Video/Music player
mpv/cmus
>Image viewer
qpdfview
>File Manager
PCmanFM
>Text Editor
emacs
>Shell
zsh
>Web Browser
firefucks
>Terminal
terminology

and why is that bad?

>muh sekret minimalism club

I would hope you dont go android threads asking for ios apps? Why would you go gnu/linux thread to talk about windows software?

Sometimes I just want to drag a big box around files I want to move. Is Thunar really the best for for mouse-controlled file management?

this

> Solus
> i3-gaps
> mpv, mpd + ncmpcpp
> feh
> ranger
> vim
> zsh
> firefox nightly with vimium-ff
> tilda + urxvt