Music file bitrate is less than 130kbps

>Music file bitrate is less than 130kbps

Other urls found in this thread:

websdr.ewi.utwente.nl:8901/
listening-test.coresv.net/results.htm
soundcloud.com/chrismossacid/plays-the-hits-tape-dj-mix-32kbps-2005
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>Music file bitrate is less than 320kbps

>flac file bitrate is less than 750kbps average

>Music file bitrate is less than 1300kbps

ftfy.

>Using mp3s in 2015+2

silly (You), mp3 files only go up to 320kbps
you can't tell the difference at anything higher

>his music has been converted to digital at one point

>listening to anything that isn't at least SACD

>mp3
literally pleb

>he isn't present at the studio when it's being recorded

you cannot tell the difference between 50kbps and flac

>encoding to mp3
if you don't have the disk space to encode to FLAC, use opus. it's better than mp3 in every possible way

>music bitrate is higher than 16kbps

>he listens to music through his disposable apple ear buds
Pleb detected.

>music bitrate is higher than 8kbps

>he doesn't have a band available 24/7 anywhere he goes whenever he wants to listen to music

>music bitrate is higher than 1bps

>Music file has same quality as from YouTube playlist

>he listens to music

>he doesn't store thousands of 1bps audio files that play in unison to assemble a singular song

> he stores audio files
> doesn't stream

>he streams

FLAC, SACD or gtfo.

> be me
> use opus
> music in 96kbps
> podcasts in 32kbps

Opus is shit

>he does not convert his music to the .nbs format which allows replay of it by using minecraft noteblocks.

Get this man out of here.

>using anything other than a phonograph for the mechanical reproduction of sound

It serves its purpose

>He doesn't use sequenced audio formats.

You can easily fix it by encode it manually to 320 kbps.

Lossy audio codecs have no place in the modern world.

Go FLAC or stay back.

excellent bait

Opus purpose is saving bandwidth on voice calling on phones, not music.

> Opus is unmatched for interactive speech and music transmission over the Internet, but is also intended for storage and streaming applications.
Why should I choose something else if I can use best solution for 32-128 kbps.

>bitrate is over 128kbps
>for spoken word

All the music on my PMP is 96kbps

>2018
>People wasting their time making algorithm to compress audio and reducing the quality
They could do something productive instead, but nope, they picked shit.

Is there any purpose in converting a non-FLAC sound file (like MP3) to FLAC?

Also why does MP3 still exist?

did you really need to ask the first question desu
>Also why does MP3 still exist?
mp3 still exists because the majority of website where you can purchase music only offer flac and mp3 usally don't even have flac

>120 kbps opus sounds better than 192kbps mp3

What did they mean by this?

>not listening Romanian folk music on longwave radio

websdr.ewi.utwente.nl:8901/ tune to 153 kHz, thank me later

Actually yeah. What's the purpose of converting to FLAC is the quality was already lost due to the source file being MP3 already

no. the lossy damage has been done

>thank me later
I'm thanking you now user. This is really something else

>not streaming hi res.

Dues it prevent further loss over time?
Why do some official music CDs come in MP3?

>Why do some official music CDs come in MP3?
nice bait

it's a little known fact but streaming is also VERY sensitive to rotational velocidensity especially if the cloud servers are located a bit far away (a 100-150 miles distance is already noticeable for a normal adult)

>further loss over time.

this is great

252kHz has things happening too

the cold truth

>believing bullshit marketing images
stay gullible, peasant

The free Spotify (192 kbps ogg) sounds exactly the same as flac

>anything other than .wav files

This shit's fucking great.

>using pcm

> marketing images
listening-test.coresv.net/results.htm

>song is less than 20 MB

r8

How the fuck do people find this shit

It's time to move to AAC.

Cute

> streams
> he doesn't try to capture very faint shortwave signals live and listen to the recordings

*opus

>he doesn't use his own shortwave radio to listen to live broadcasts

198 is also doing thibgs

> listening to shortwave
> not listening to echos of space debe in our atmosphere

There's no natural sound in space.

...

>11289600Hz(0.1%)
wut?

I'm guessing it's DSD tracks

>transcoding podcasts

I fail to see the issue; it's mere speech. You're not listening for how they sound but for what they say.

Why bother though, just delete them after you listen to them. Unless you care about archival, in which case you shouldn't transcode either.

Because you can stock up on a fuckload and consume little spe

...

Why? That was 10 hours ago

>64 kbps is more than enough for music encoded using opus 1.2+

There isn't any need to transcode them if you're not a drivelet. Keep all of them on your home server in the original format, and put a few on your phone/media player/laptop, swapping out what you've already listened to.

Or I could transcode them, put them on my DAP, and have additional space for more mosic.

soundcloud.com/chrismossacid/plays-the-hits-tape-dj-mix-32kbps-2005

thread theme

Comfy

>Ooga booga booga *grunt*

Human ear can't hear more than 96kbps.

I can tell the difference to some extent on my Skullcandy Grinds and chink tablet (granted it has Dolby Audio). What is wrong with you ears user?

Isn't bitrate useless and not important for lossless formats?

>music file bitrate is less than 600000 kbps

Average kbps can speak to lossless quality (maybe of recording equipment and such) like kbps can for other music filetypes.

holy fuck that's amazing

Whats a good tool for converting a crapload of 320kbps mp3s to opus?

>Lossy to lossy
No.
Redownload your collection in FLAC then convert to 256kbps VBR Opus

Fat ass are best ass.

...

>measuring in bitrate instead of sample rate

In void u mean, but space isn't actually a perfect void

>He pays to stream @ 320kbps

>Not using 128kbps opus

tip-top kek user

I'm unironically considering switching to 96kbps Opus from now on. Might have to do some listening tests

>download individual songs and full albums in mp3 ""320kbps"" from torrents and mp3 search engines
>a lot of them are actually decent quality and not even clipped at 16kHz