Tfw told my dad I was a globalist and he punched me in the face

>tfw told my dad I was a globalist and he punched me in the face

I'm sitting in a McDonald's typing this. I'm too scared to go back

Other urls found in this thread:

jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html
youtube.com/watch?v=_peUxE_BKcU
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalism
independent.co.uk/voices/eu-referendum-brexit-young-people-upset-by-the-outcome-of-the-eu-referendum-why-didnt-you-vote-a7105396.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

What is a globalist?

I've only heard Sup Forums use that word

A boogeyman

Someone who doesn't believe in arbitrary national borders drawn up on a whim 200 years ago.

So you don't believe in having borders? So people just come and go freely? Seems kind of illogical

Too bad he didn't kill you

No, people go to where work is. Some lands may be badly managed and cannot support life therefore people should be able to move. Unless they're pooinloos or chinks.

Really?
It's a person who thinks star trek is a real obtainable future

So people should just abandon their country when there's a problem and other country's shouldn't oppose this or limit immigrant intake?

Not seeing how this will work desu

People come and go where the resources are, and where the resources are managed the most efficiently?

Why should we enforce shitty arbitrary lines in areas where resources aren't being utilized properly?

Because it lowers my quality of life
My and my families qualities of life matters more than some shitskins

How can you be so sure they'll be utilized efficiently if you don't control immigration with intelligent decisions?

Does immigration control occur as part of "efficiently" to you? Because id argue that is also a part of efficiency

Not yet at least, the world isn't ready. Its more a philosophical viewpoint which influences an individual's political decisions. Though a good thought, it isnt realistic. Think Muslims in Europe and the rise in terrorism.

If you want the collapse of "globalist" NATO, EU and USA, but not Russia and China.

>Lives on an island nation
>Doesn't 'believe' in its borders

>drawn up on a whim 200 years ago.

There is nothing stopping you from using your superior purchasing power from buying an island paradise in Indonesia, is there?

Stop your whining and raise your standard so you can keep up with third-worlders outperforming you in your own environment.

There is nothing more disgusting than protectionism and border control. It's literally giving the retard kid a piggyback in a 100m sprint.

Your cheque is in the mail.

You didn't answer my question

You mention efficiency but is well thought out public policy, which includes how immigration is handled NOT part of efficiency?

>Whining
I'm not whining about anything I'm just trying to understand your point of view and how this idea would work

>Op states that he's a globalist
>Get's assaulted by his father

I can sympathise with your dad cuz Globalist are the cancer of politics

>national histories and patrimonies don't matter, everything is just a big rat race for money and resources

Western democracies csme to think that "human beings desire nothing beyond ease, security and avoidance of pain."
Fascism was "psychologically far sounder than any hedonistic conception of life."
"Whereas socialism, and even capitalism... have said to people 'I offer you a good time,' Hitler said to them, 'I offer you struggle, danger and death,' and as a result a whole nation flings itself at his feet." George Orwell

>people actually falling for this bait

>bait

*rips up cheque*

>what is humanism

A losing strategy.

jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

>what is suicidal altruism

>WE WUZ EMPERORS AND SHEEIIIT

I don't believe in the past, I believe in progressive thinking aimed to shape our future. Nothing good comes out of traditionalism.

Absolve borders and nationalities and allow the presence of people solely based on merit. I don't see how this is so hard to understand.

We should not tolerate living with mediocre oxygen thieves just because they happened to be born in a certain location. Those who are inefficient and low standard should be incentivized to move to areas that are willing to have lower standards.

Personally I would happily much rather have 10 literate and qualified Chinese immigrants than a 150 local beneficiaries.

>What is disregarding the longterm affects on society and economy in a country for "muh lets make people good now"

No it doesn't. You are not entitled to any free gibs because you were born somewhere.

If that "shitskin" contributes more, he has earned the right to a greater quality of life. You haven't.

Ayn Rand? You're on Sup Forums?

He was specific about the type of altruism.
Ethnocentrism is the winning strategy. That's why it's natural human tendency and is combated with years of brainwashing.

jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

Good. Globalism is the cancer that is tearing down Western Society.

Keep wasting your life away false flagging on Sup Forums's Sup Forums you pathetic globalist NEET, this is absolutely pathetic

Kill yourself

>Absolve borders and nationalities and allow the presence of people solely based on merit. I don't see how this is so hard to understand

How do you determine merit? Is the current system which requires immigrants to have certain requirements not merit-based?


>We should not tolerate living with mediocre oxygen thieves just because they happened to be born in a certain location.

Why shouldn't we? What should we do with them then?

>Those who are inefficient and low standard should be incentivized to move to areas that are willing to have lower standards

How can that be incentivized if you already eliminated borders and thus people can live wherever they wish?
>Personally I would happily much rather have 10 literate and qualified Chinese immigrants than a 150 local beneficiaries.

Why does your personal preference matter in this discussion?

>told my dad I was a globalist and he punched me in the face
>western parenting

>people

This thread shows how big of pursues whites have become now. They literally destroyed whole countries and tell locals not to cry about it but now they see a little brown, yellow or black in their country they start crying like little bitchs. Whites are the fat kid of the playground who changes the rules if he is losing

poo in the loo pajeet

youtube.com/watch?v=_peUxE_BKcU

tl.dr its believing everything to be on the global level and wants the world to have one government one day
organizations such as the EU AU and UN are globalists

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalism

borders are shit
america and the eu should allow russians to move to these countries freely

Literally no one is crying just trying to understand the viewpoint.

I love how it went from:

Borders and countries are wrong we are one race ---> So? Whites are dumb and lazy too sometimes, we should allow people who are smarter to move more -----> "WHITE PEOPLE KILLED OUR PEOPLE A LONG TIME AGO SO NOW WE WANT TO GET REVENGE, CRYING PUSSIES WHY SHOULDNT WE?"

You're not making a very good argument, if anything youre making an argument for why unchecked immigration is a bad thing

This is so true. Just look at the vitriol I'm refusing for daring to question their existing structure.

White people are literally the biggest double standards crybabbies in existence

Point proven

BTW I got into Mc Gill with a job lined up as soon as I finish my masters. Cry some more you waste of space

This entire thread was started by a butthurt globalist though, he was the only one bitchhing.

You're making blanket statements about globalism even though I'm expressly advocating the free movement of people by way of merit.

Stop projecting untruthful statements to hide your own insecurities about your work being undermined by competent third worlders.

How much do you make in tips?

Show me a continent apart from Europe that is having mass unchecked immigration. Canada, USA and Australia have very strict immigration policies. Heck it's really hard to migrate to Europe legally. Stop spending too much time on this echo chamber website

someone who believes the globe should be unified, although knowing it can not be done in 1 or 50 lifetimes.
Radical globalists want to see it done by any means, as quickly as possible, ignoring meaningful collateral damage.

You arent making a convincing argument

You're just saying
>Borders are wrong
>Wtf it should be THIS way
>I FEEL...
>I THINK...

>By merit
I asked above how this is determined if you're free to move. Wouldn't merit be a sensible immigration policy rather than absence of it?

>Your insecurities...
I am an immigrant by the way, but you aren't explaining anything

the new zealander is kinda cringy
read this shit if you care

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalism

one world government and whatnot
most ideologies are globalist 2bh
facism wanting to take over the world
communism
capitalism etc

>Show me a continent apart from Europe that is having mass unchecked immigration

When did I say they were?
No first world country is, that's exactly my point. But it's what OP is trying to argue for

>Canada, USA and Australia have very strict immigration policies.

Yes I know. That's why theyre successful

> Stop spending too much time on this echo chamber website

I don't think you read my posts

>People come and go where the resources are, and where the resources are managed the most efficiently?
Like say, putting up borders too keep all the scum out?

>Wouldn't merit be a sensible immigration policy rather than absence of it

That's exactly what I'm saying. The richest countries will require the highest levels of merit, and everyone who can't meet that standard will slowly be pushed out by factors such as living costs. Likewise, the poorest countries will have the lowest standards of merit, where bottom-feeders in the Western world can move to.

We have 11 million illegals in our country and whites have went from 90 percent of the population to a projected 30-40 percent in the next few decades. There was a huge demographic change here because of migration

Which is perfectly reasonable because the Americas have always been more Hispanic than Anglo.

You need to realize that Anglo populations in the Americas are an anomaly.

>this fucking thread
There's no way you're unironically a globalist , if you were your father should have taken you out back and shot you.

So how the fuck would that work?

>Have the highest levels of merit

How? What will be the governing body of that merit and what enforcement will they use?

Perhaps the governing body will be the government and the enforcement will be... borders?

Literally contraindicating yourself.

Further how would public services function if taxes are fucked up because people move freely?

Gotta leave, there's some kid's party over here. I'll explain when I go to my friend's house in a while.

>Just let people move wherever they want bro! Taxes will somehow get paid in order to fund public services somehow

>Which is perfectly reasonable because the Americas have always been more Hispanic than Anglo.
No because it's the United States, not the "Americas". You are extending the definition of the area, Hispanics are an anomaly in this area them self, not one existed here over 600 years ago, anglos are as natural here as they are.

Meaningless meme term

Taxes are a meme designed to make you think you need public government.

The market will naturally adjust to provide the necessary public services.

What about food safety or workers rights?

Do you just want to be like somalia?

Shhh let the child live in his fantasy world

I'm a capitalist but you need to have some regulation and well thought out public policy so that the country actually functions and prospers

As long as markets fail there will always be a public sector funded by taxes. It's that simple. If the markets functioned perfectly without ever failing there would be no need for governments.

I'm only mad that he didn't punch your mom's pregnant belly instead.

...

t. Stalin

>There is nothing more disgusting than protectionism and border control. It's literally giving the retard kid a piggyback in a 100m sprint.

Jesus christ, found the kid who got told he can't get a new computer this year because dad's milk has dropped in value.

>changes the rules if he is losing
That's a breddy gud way to keep winning and it's a sound strategy because you're too weak to oppose it.

>The market will naturally adjust to provide the necessary public services.
>
>
>
lol

>tfw your country is full of dirty cosmopolites

That's grim

GOTTA

ikr.

jesus christ

Well fortunately, the retards who vote on these polls probably won't actually bother to vote in your elections.

independent.co.uk/voices/eu-referendum-brexit-young-people-upset-by-the-outcome-of-the-eu-referendum-why-didnt-you-vote-a7105396.html

That's what they do.

They don't vote, then they realize nationalists are growing stronger and stronger, they go full retard and they vote en masse for the other guy.

yep.

You thought Sweden was cucked? LOOK AT FRANCE AND LAUGH :^)

what website is this famalam?

Your dad's a good man.