lol?
Lol?
Isaac Williams
Other urls found in this thread:
cpu.userbenchmark.com
twitter.com
Juan Hernandez
What? All I see is two shitty processors.
Jack Diaz
Yeah, it's hilarious how shitty userbenchmark is.
Alexander Walker
>tfw the A11 in my iPhone X is more powerful than both
Sebastian Flores
this
Angel Brooks
stale bait is stale
Brayden Wood
...
Joseph Young
spbp
Lucas Adams
We really need to solve the Sup Forums problem.
Christian Fisher
Name one thing wrong with this benchmark
Lucas Lewis
>comparing with 1700x instead of the 1700
>using age as a measurement
>using core/thread count as a measurement
>using clocks as a measurement
>turbo: 0.55 GHz
benchmark bem merda esse hein
Jacob Robinson
>i5 beats any 1700 at all, by any margin
>cheaper intel cpu beats top of the line ryzen
>this is acceptable
Are all AMD buyers this delusional
Landon Collins
i just addressed the main issues with that benchmark, i didn't say the i5 was worse or better than the 1700. this depends solely on your usecase, there's no objective choice to be made here.
Jace Thomas
It's accurate though, the 8600k has single core advantage, which the benchmark shows.
Juan Martinez
also
>much higher market share: +40%
Luke Brooks
At a higher price of 17 euroshekels you get 2 more cores and 10 more threads.
>b-but muh gayming performance!!!
OK
William Sanders
How is i5 overall still better then
Austin Clark
> Are all AMD buyers this delusional
yes. not even joking.
Joshua Collins
Look at picture. Because:
>muh gayming
>muh desktop (???)
Whatever last one means. We can't even see what kind of benchmarks were made. But if you see at "workstation benchmark" ryzen is clearly better.
Brayden Wright
BUT IT WINS IT MULTITHREAD
A 6 CORE 6 THREAD PROCESSOR BEATS A 8 CORE 16 THREAD PROCESSOR IN MULTITHREADING
HELLO?
Carter Anderson
>R$
you've been shilling for Intel for months, you god damn sopa de macaco eater, how much money did you make? 9999999 R$ (0.0001US$)?
Aiden Long
Show me multithreaded benchmarks then. OP didn't post one, he posted: "gaming, desktop, workstation" performance. Not even a benchmarks.
Samuel Adams
also, as you can see multicore performance is 52% faster than intels.
Jace Hughes
...
Hunter Parker
You super nigger you just proved yourself wrong
Jacob Roberts
But that's wrong what you stated.
Nolan Harris
>top of the line ryzen loses to measly i5 in quad core benchmarks
AMD fags on literal suicide watch
Alexander Ross
Why anyone would be on suicide watch for not caring about gaymes performance?
Multicore performance is superior, only Sup Forums should care about single and quad cores, because that's what most newest gaymes require and this is where intel shines.
If you're arguing about intel being better because it's better at gaymes then you're really retarded.
Do not try to justify your PC setup built and used for gayming, because you still will do these things.
Ayden Price
The fact that it loses to any >1 core bench, let alone to i5 (we're talking 1800x and not 1600x), is laughable.
Also single perf matters more for 95% of common tasks so there's that.
Evan Peterson
Good thing the rest of the planet buys Ryzen since it actually has value and it's not a paper launch
cpu.userbenchmark.com
Jaxson Taylor
Dont use your monkey language here.
Joseph Barnes
AMDrones always believe what they are told by their corporate overlords.
Chase Wood
>market share as a deciding factor
Jonathan Allen
Its not included, just shown.
Rad the FAQ.