Nothing to hide = nothing to fear

The only people that encourage encryption of everything and going off grid are doing illegal shit e.g. terrorists and pedos.
The only acceptable use of Encryption is preventing malicious criminals and the general public from seeing what you are doing, or getting your personal info. Governments and law enforcement have the right to see what you are doing to prevent crime.

Admit it pedos, you are hiding a terabyte of Loli porn and using “muh privacy” as your justification for your illegal activity.

GTFO of by interblabs!

what is the fourth amendment...for us USA posters

my internet browsing should stay private, as it occurs within my own household using my private devices.

Somehow I doubt the integrity of this post.

>It's 2018
>Privacy?
>Fourth amendment?
Not anymore, kid.

>nothing to hide
>anonymous image
Post your face and time table first

Or it’s people who have opinions or ideas, commonly and easily stored and accessed in the form of memes, or even simply fucking books, that despite being totally legal, may one day be declared illegal by some sort of radical authoritarian government with opposing ideas and beliefs.

Aka, anyone with a fucking brain
Aka not

>ooh my nazi memes hue hue ooga booga

suck my dick m8

yep, you got me, I'm a terrorist.
Can't bring down the government if they're always intercepting and reading my messages, can I?

I kinda agree
pedos gtfo

>only nazis would ever have their ideas banned by a radical authoritarian government.
Fat retarded American who assumes everyone on the web is also a fat retarded American detected. Nazi ideology is already banned in my country btw, this is not a priority for me.
2nd purpose - handling legal documents and sensitive data for clients.
3rd purpose - bank managing software
4th purpose - Anyone with a laptop who doesn’t want to risk a potential thief accessing their plethora of personal information
Go back to r3ddit, faggot

> governments and law enforcement have the right to know what you are doing
Yea no
Also imagine someone going through your trash, piecing everything together and later knocking on your door: "hey user I see you threw away your programming socks, I got them on offer for ya"
The way things are going is making it easy for authoritarian regimes to do whatever the fuck they want to whoever they want, encryption can be very useful in these regimes
It's not because pedo's use it that it is evil, pedo's eat to but we all do don't we?
Maybe get into politics as you clearly know how to link certain negative attributes to stuff that doesn't suit your agenda

>Governments and law enforcement have the right to see what you are doing to prevent crime.
And if the government decides to make something a crime that shouldn't be?

Fat retarded American here: Don't associate this faggot with us please, thank you.

Private devices using another company's resources to acquire content. Misuse of their services for illegal activity gives them free reign in supporting investigations. But frankly, you have to be into serious shit to even be on their radar.

>But frankly, you have to be into serious shit to even be on their radar.
In the UK we have something called The Investigatory Powers act where all UK based ISPs are required by law to record your browsing history and make it available to a long list of government organisations. They will undoubtedly abuse this capability.

wrong. i'm using encryption so that ordinary civilian can go fuck himself.

police can break it anyway.

and i don't store pedo anime shitty pics on my hardware

Agree. Now you lead with example. Post here your face and address and last month of your search history. Also I would like to see everything on your social media.
What? Are you pedo?
I'm a cop btw, you can trust me.
To protect and serve.

>Encryption is preventing malicious criminals and the general public from seeing what you are doing
You are the general public. Not a member of law enforcement in my jurisdiction.

>Encryption is preventing malicious criminals and the general public from seeing what you are doing
Didn’t even read the OP did you? That was already covered. Fucking retard. >Encryption is preventing malicious criminals and the general public from seeing what you are doing
Needed to quote this again because you pedos appear to struggle with reading. Your analogy is BTFO because it had already been covered.

That’s not for you to decide. If a government votes to make something illegal and there is no significant outcry From Joe Public and only from fringe groups, then it’s illegal. Just because you disagree with the law doesn’t mean you can break it, criminal scum.

After you show me your warrant card as required by law.

Sage

>Title literally quoted off the Nazi chancellor
K E K
E
K

How is the pay to post this bullshit fucking shill?
nothing to hide? show me a image of your poop
why no? or do you are a drug mule?

(You)

Everyone has everything to hide, it's called privacy.
Why don't you go ahead and post your full name you bitch, if you didn't do anything wrong you got nothing to hide, right?

>The only people that encourage putting locks on doors and everything and going off grid are doing illegal shit e.g. terrorists and pedos.
>The only acceptable use of locks is preventing malicious criminals and the general public from seeing what you are doing, or stealing your personal personal property. Governments and law enforcement have the right to a copy of every key to see what you are doing to "prevent crime".
>Admit it pedos, you are hiding a terabyte of Loli porn and using “muh privacy” as your justification for your illegal activity.
>there is no way that copies of these keys could fall into the hands of the irresponsible or malicious criminals and used to enter your house without permission or a warrant from a judge
>also I am a massive faggot that sucks a lot of fat dicks
>t. OP

Retards still can’t read

>The only acceptable use of Encryption is preventing malicious criminals and the general public from seeing what you are doing.
You are the general public. I don’t need to show you shit.

>shitty false equivalence

>1s and 0s are illegal
gg

>Nothing to hide = nothing to fear
Then we should have public cameras in every bathroom. Nothing to hide after all.

Sage.

I mean.. ya, in a specific order they are.

> Governments and law enforcement have the right to see what you are doing
They very specifically do not.

oh so you think the state always has good intentions?

HELLO terrorist pedo scum

If you lock your front door and draw your curtains you're a criminal and a pedophile.

>1s and 0s in specific order are illegal
gg

RETARD
It only makes you a criminal if you are implementing those things to hide your activity from law enforcement and the government.
This was all covered in the OP. You are just too stupid to read.

Fuck off big brother

Fuck your OP you faggot.

>your OP BTFOs my pedo ass so I won’t read it
Literally you.

>>shitty false equivalence
>I don't know how encryption works at all
>t. mouth breathing faglord OP

cryptography is cyber munitions
the 2nd ammendment applies therefore it SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
also.
>he's on Sup Forums the board that had loli doujin dump threads
>does not like loli
are you gay?

excellent bait

>The only acceptable use of Encryption is preventing malicious criminals [...] from seeing what you are doing
>Governments and law enforcement have the right to see what you are doing to prevent crime.
Governments and law enforcement are malicious criminals.

>ha I’ll post a /sci/ meme and a bunch of insults
>that’ll show him
The pinnacle of a Sup Forums manchild’s argumentation skills

>I should have the right to enslave children
T. Ancap scum
Quite fitting for the pedo argument too.

You do know that being a pedofile is not illegal and is not a crime?

>Assumes there's a clear and controllable distinction between law enforcement accessing his data and criminals accessing his data
>Assumes law enforcement gives enough of a fuck about his data to properly secure it on their end once it's obtained
>Assumes none of his seemingly innocent activities will ever be targeted by any political group in power who's views differ from his
>Assumes those in power will never try anything malicious when presented with unlimited access to everyone's lives
>Assumes the 4th Amendment was written for pedos and terrorists
>Assumes he has enough chromosomes to attempt to engage in such socio-politics

So many false assumptions, so few braincells

...

>You do know that wanting to fuck kids is not illegal and is not a crime?

>t. Pedo criminal

>t though police

>assumes everyone lives in his 44% non-white shithole where you can be charged with a hate crime for misgendering someone
Point to a single instance where any of your bullshit statements actually happened.
I’ll wait.

Pedos are mentally ill and should be treated or hung if they act.

this
the only cure is a dose of hot lead to the head.

>>ha I’ll post a /sci/ meme and a bunch of insults
>>that’ll show him
>The pinnacle of a Sup Forums manchild’s argumentation skills

What if someone is attracted to 14-15 year old fully developed girls who are at their prime and of perfect childbearing age?
Is that illegal too?

>mockery is the highest form of flattery
I’ll take the compliment.

If it’s not legal in your country, you shouldn’t do it. Simple as.
Also that’s hebephillia, not pedophillia.

this is not a counterargument to even a single one of my points, how about I'LL wait for you to attempt to argue any of my points beyond baiting me to waste more of my time on your autism by writting fuckin essays for you u actual retard

>>mockery is the highest form of flattery
>I’ll take the compliment.

As usual OP is a giant faggot.
>you don’t trust the government therefore you’re a criminal
>muh statism

“A freedom that is interested only in denying freedom must be denied.” –Simone De Beauvoir

Pedofilia is legal in saudi arabia, I guess its ok for saudis to do it.

Look, you're back.
Are you going to show off your military-grade shilling again, huelander?

OP, you're dead wrong.

In literally your second sentence, you prove your point to be wrong, by providing a valid reason to encrypt.

In your first, you again prove to be wrong when you make a glaringly misinformed generalization, and go on to believe that when the government spies on you, it's legal. The NSA doesn't care about warrants.

Finally, your last sentence, you make another sorely mistaken generalization.

Quit your shilling, crawl back into the hole you came from.

>all these disgusting pedo apologists in this thread

Fantastically overwhelming counter argument. You’re on the verge of convincing me to trust the government.

warrant card? required by law?

AHA WE HAVE A PEDO

Cybercrime is a legitimate offense, yes.

You might as well argue that chemicals in a certain arrangement shouldnt be illegal.

You're a stupid shit and I hope you get raped and murdered by other stupid shits like yourself

There is literally nothing wrong with feeling funny because of little kids.

Twitter is already considering banning people for their activity on other websites. We have a right to privacy, and you can fuck right off OP.

t. Terrorist pedo apologists

What do you mean? Are you implying it's bad that little kids make my wee wee feel funny?

As retarded as this thread is, at the end of the day this is basically just a discussion on how much power and authority law enforcement and the government should have. Giving people the ability to do potentially illegal or negative things at the benefit of privacy, versus giving those in power complete access to everyone's lives at the cost of that power potentially being abused.

Okay, then please give me your bank accounts, passwords, address, phone numbers, and your entire internet history. Now fuck off and SAGE

Tbh I care much more about surveillance from companies than from the government. Feels like corporations are stronger entities.

Fuck Facebook. Fuck Microsoft. Google is cancer but not as bad as those 2. FB changed the world for worse and MS pays its way through politicians to keep governments as its clients. It also mistreats customers who depend on their software for one reason or another.

Google at least contributes to OSS. AOSP is free as in freedom. Chromium is statically the most secure browser today and can be built to be 100% free. Fuck their online services, tho.

post your ssn

>I'm a terrorist for not wanting to be banned on Twitter for my views

...

>The only acceptable use of Encryption is preventing malicious criminals and the general public from seeing what you are doing, or getting your personal info.
That's exactly why we need encryption. You see, sometimes, criminals sneak into law enforcement.

It's their choice to give whever they want the privilege of using their stuff. Maybe you're the one who deserves getting banned for undesireable activity. After all, why would i want to associate with someone who masturbates to cartoon depictions of children? Not that it's objectively wrong.

Any exploit or vulnerability available for use by the government is also available to criminals, therefore your entire argument is invalid and you're just a dumb faggot shill.

Encryption is a REQUIREMENT for any online activity involving financial transactions, personal information, protected business/personal data such as financial records and passwords, medical information, etc. Encryption also ensures that someone who gains access to a private network cannot access all of the private information that may be available on that network, or that someone who gains physical access to a machine storing sensitive data cannot easily access that data.

Long story short, encryption has a legitimate use for literally every person who has ever or will ever use a computer and you are a huge dumb faggot.

Sure, it's their choice, but it's also my choice whether or not they have access to my activity on other websites, because I have just as much of a right to my data and internet history as they do to their platform.

That is unthinkable. They are the law, you know? How can they possibly become criminals if they're the ones in charge of judging? They are required to judge themselves first.

C-...could it be that morality is not defined by a nation's laws?

You are wrong. Your activity on other websites belong to those other websites and they are free of notifying twitter about whatever they want. Still, you're not getting cut from content if you're a law abiding citizen. Twitter is a respectable and trustworthy company.

nice b8 faggot but fuck off

The first amendment guarantees freedom of speech, and yet certain entirely legal views can result in Twitter bans even if they're posted on other sites.

And fuck no, my activity does not belong to those other sites.

Go ahead, keep being the NSA's buttboy, I'm sure they'll reward you someday.

Impossible. The law is the law and the citizens are subjects to the state. If you don't like it you can leave the country anytime, whether you remain unscathed depends if you do it lawfully or not, still other countries have as much right to not let an invader like you to enter them. After all, you're a running criminal who would not let himself be subject to a fellow moral state.

Two more faggots who can’t read.
>The only acceptable use of Encryption is preventing malicious criminals and the general public from seeing what you are doing, or getting your personal info.
>the general public

>And fuck no, my activity does not belong to those other sites.

Try reading those weird "Terms of Service" and "Privacy Policy" thingies before clicking "accept".

Yeah, yeah, quit the LARP shit.

Seriously, I don't know what fucked up shit Yuropoors think about their government, but in the US the government serves the people, the people do NOT serve the government.

But user, nobody is prosecuting you from stating your view. Twitter is not a governmental service, they are as free to do what they want (lawfully) as the mods on Sup Forums have of banning me for posting lewds of the previous mascot of Sup Forums.
And yes, your activity is the footprint you leave on their sites, you are willingly contributing to their data.

This isn’t 1776 anymore faggot.
You pay taxes, people enlist in the army, you pay for drivers licences, insurance etc and you follow the law of the land to the letter otherwise you suffer the consequences.

You are a slave to the government, because as soon as you step out of line, they come crashing down.

But keep deluding yourself faggot.

Guess what? Things like EULA and ToS are commonly thrown out in court because they're bullshit and judges don't give a fuck. Besides, I'm free to protect my content and history.

And I am free as fucking shit to prevent Twitter from seeing my browsing history, because that is my fucking data. Keep in mind Twitter isn't getting their data from other websites, mostly because other sites presumably realize that this is Orwellian bullshit and they won't help Twitter do it, we're talking about Twitter using the information available from your cookies and browser history.

The fact you are here complaining about people breaking the law who aren't behind bars is proof you are full of shit. Also, the fact that we elected Trump instead of the government appointing a new President is also proof you're a retard. Go live in Saudi Arabia if you enjoy your government shoving their fist up your ass and using you as a puppet, otherwise shut the fuck up.

>gets BTFO on his government rant
>moves the goalposts
Hahahahaha

Why don’t any of you idiots defending OP defend the absurd position that government is essentially trustworthy? I can provide countless examples contrary to your blind trust.

Please tell me which goalposts I moved. Government serves the people in the US, which is the only reason we still have firearms and the only reason we still elect our leaders. We also have free speech, something Europeans have mostly given up at this point.

Walk into Times Square and call a black person a nigger to his face with a cop present. See how much free speech you really have.