Samsung S9 benchmarks leaked

Samsung S9 benchmarks leaked.

Your thoughts?

Other urls found in this thread:

geekbench.com/blog/2017/12/iphone-performance-and-battery-age/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Benchmarks mean nothing unless they support the popular opinion of Sup Forums

Pathetic. Qualcuck just can't compete with the apple superiority.
Another reason why lagdroid will never succeed.

>geekbench shows the iPhone X is far ahead of any android
>Sup Forums: lol geekbench is completely unreliable!

>geekbench shows apple is throttling older phones
>Sup Forums: wtf i love geekbench now, everybody look at this and take it 100% at face value

Pretty impressive. Soon Samsung will catch up to a throttled iPhone with a dying battery. iToddlers btfo!

>Samsung S9 still way behind the previous generation iPhone

how can gooks compete? at this rate it will be 2020 before Samsung catches up to the iPhone X in multi core score

pathetic apple processor starts throttling after 6 months due to poor manufacturing process and low quality material

>geekbench values decrease by 30+% on the same phone
>this is NOT THROTHLING!! LET ME SUCK ON THAT APPLE DICK MORE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

other than that geekbench does not matter
iPhones are still toys that cannot even multitask and make everything way harder than it has to be.

i don't really care. a phone is a fucking phone, not a workstation. I couldn't give two shits about better GPU for games i don't play or a faster CPU that i'll only use for web browsing and everyday tasks

i fucking hate the direction phones are heading

>30+% on the same phone
what?
the initial Reddit post that started this discussion and made Apple admit it only showed the difference of

geekbench.com/blog/2017/12/iphone-performance-and-battery-age/
fucking retard apple shill
kill yourself

so you replace the battery on your phone when you need to, otherwise you will experience negative effects, whether you have an iphone or a samsung.

>still using 3rd party cpu
This is why samshit is shit. Xiaomi is already using their in-house chip like Apple and Huawei.

>waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah apple hurt my feelings
fucking retards going on crusades over phones, jesus christ this is just sad
>implying i even use apple
i'm on a Z3C i bought on release and won't drop until it stops working

>a throttled iphone 7 still scores as high as a brand new Galaxy S9
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha droidbabbies will defend this

>i-it's only 5%
>gets btfo
>y-you just need to replace the battery
>this was explained by apple only after outrage and a lawsuit
>b-but it's now only 29$
>move to save face by apple
stop fucking shilling
no one wants you here
go away
kill yourself

crusades? no, fuck no, I'm just pointing out a FACT
I know, those are scary to retards

>scores as high
>lags like a motherfucker compared to the android counterpart
kek

A DroidCuck has defended this

3-4 years, more likely

defended what

I've used an iPhone before, that's really the only reason why I own a galaxy s8 now
shit's fucking disgusting
why would you hurt yourself like that is beyond me

>a FACT
that a degraded battery impacts phones negatively?
shocking, really shocking
you can either have the phone just die on you despite being at 40% of battery or above (happened on both my Nexus 4 and Nexus 5) or lower the performance so it doesn't happen. I'd take the second option anytime.
Besides, anyone with half a brain cell left would just replace the battery.

1034 cycles later, I’m still waiting for this massive battery degradation.

phone processors have been more than capable for years
t. moto e4 plus

Thoughts?

What are those?

iPhone X users, there is a very easy way to see if you need to replace your battery.

Run geekbench on it. If you notice your score is low, like the Samsung S8, you may want to consider replacing the battery.

>Qualcuck
Benchmark invalidated, waiting for the Exynos one.

The software update doesn't affect the 5S. Potentially the CPU can't be throttled in the same way but I'm not entirely sure.
It's only the 6 and higher.

>j-just wait, 2018 year of the Samcuck
Lmao

Serious questinon, I have a shitty 80$ no-name brand phone from 2014, and everything is still pretty much instant. What the fuck do people need 5x more performance for?
Video games?
Fuckhueg excel sheets with macros?

Who gives a shit at this point honestly.
They would massively improve perceived performance by not including a boatload of bloat.
Yet they keep laying more clutter over an already cluttered Android operating system.
I'd buy a Pixel but they're not as good as Sammy in the hardware department. Such a pain.

Who knows.
Perhaps the 5S battery has a higher cycle limit. Perhaps you won the battery lottery (it's not like every battery on the 501st cycle will lose 10% of its capacity).
Perhaps you even took care of your battery better than most people do.

We can't really say from your single example, iToddler.

>Serious question, I have a shitty 3 inch penis with 2 inches of girth. Everything still works pretty much fine including sperm and urine. What do you need all that extra size for? Pleasing a woman? Feeling good about?

phone performance had basically peaked, unless your gayming or doing vr (lol) it doesn't really matter. what's really holding phones back now is read/write speeds.

This whole argument is invalidated by the fact that no matter what flagship you get, once it’s battery degraded your phone will suffer.

What argument?

iPhone X has 1100 mb/s read speed and 500 mb/s write speed. Samsung S8 has 110 mb/s read and write speed

Got to say you have a good point.

I mean, I have a 7 inch penis and I'm a virgin at 32 so what good is those extra 4 inches?

buy a razer phone

and the award of 2017's worst analogy goes to a very late contender right here

retarded analogy
pleasuring women is one of the main things you want your penis to do good, which 3 inches doesn't.

>phone performance had basically peaked
people still pay the big money for more performance compared to 200$ phones. I'm just wondering what they use it for.

Doesn't state the processor, why not?

>doesnt state the processor
>sdm845
Gee I wonder what it could be.

>people still pay the big money for more performance compared to 200$ phones. I'm just wondering what they use it for.


You could say the same for any piece of technology. The 200$ phone of 2017 is the 600$ phone of 2014. Chances are in 2020 you won’t be happy with the 200 dollar phone of day but will instead want the 200 dollar phone of 2020

>Chances are in 2020 you won’t be happy with the 200 dollar phone of day but will instead want the 200 dollar phone of 2020
But that's exactly what I am, and what I wrote in the original post

What is it you do on you phone friend?

Shitpost on Sup Forums, show off as a status symbol, clean the phone daily and admire how shiny it is.

Wtf no that just compares Apples to Apples

>Qualcomm Qualcomm
Wake me when they're Exynos benchmarks. Qualcomm is actual dogshit.

This much damage control. Provide evidence that extends outperforms Qualcomm on the S8 by any significant margin

Do people not clean their phones daily?
Disgusting.

just normalfag things, browse web, call/text, watch youtube, listen to music....

I clean mine every day and take it to the Apple store once a week to be cleaned professionally by an Apple genius for $49

Xiaomi and Huawei are no name chinkshit brands that nobody recognises or cares about. Post their scores, if they're so great. Until then, Oneplus rules the reasonably priced phone with beastly specs catagory.

yeah, i never understood the cocksucking of SoCs on this board

About the same as me on my 5s. The only other thing being calling with FaceTime.
I think a lot of modern expensive phones are mostly for show, and to support their new hardware, for example face tracking, dual cameras, thinness etc as well as “console-level gaming”

What is the hypothetical ideal phone?

one that turns you into a cute girl

ITT Apple Internet Defense Squad pretending to not be retarded.

>Xiaomi and Huawei are no name brands
>one plus pajeet
found the street shitter

I want one that has as big a battery as 1.1cm of thicknss will allow. It would have a 5.2 inch screen that runs at 144hz. Headphone jack, of course. Construction would be either plastic or metal, as the needs of durability and heat management dictate. Gorilla glass 6 screen. 8gb of ram. 128gb of storage, with an extendible sd card slot. No front facing camera for maximum screen to bezel ratio. It would come with a lipped case so you can hold it without accidentally touching the screen. USB-C, as well. Lastly, it would come with a second and quickly replaceable battery, so you could hot swap it, instead of carrying a big, heavy battery bank around.

apple wins on benchmarks Sup Forums is filled with apple shills
then the first speed test comes online and apple is far behind
suddenly Sup Forums is filled with anti android shills

cant win

DEJA VU

I really need to do a poo
Shitting on the street
This is what it means to be Pajeet
I never should have gone to that curry store
My ass is SOOOOOOOORE

DEJA VU.

Post those specs Chang.

Wow, still behind the X?

you're in for a treat.

...

Can't really say anything until you know the price. I'll personally also wait until we get more info on the camera.

Amazing camera, good battery life, doesn't cost a fortune, and runs apps well enough. It doesn't have to be a supercomputer with an 8k screen god damn it.

Geekbench is SH*T.

It actually seems to have gotten worse with version 3, which you should be aware of. On ARM64, that SHA1 performance is hardware-assisted. I don't know if SHA2 is too, but Aarch64 does apparently do SHA256 in the crypto unit, so it might be fully or partially so.

And on both ARM and x86, the AES numbers are similarly just about the crypto unit.

So basically a quarter to a third of the "integer" workloads are just utter BS. They are not comparable across architectures due to the crypto units, and even within one architecture the numbers just don't mean much of anything.

And quite frankly, it's not even just the crypto ones. Looking at the other GB3 "benchmarks", they are mainly small kernels: not really much different from dhrystone. I suspect most of them have a code footprint that basically fits in a L1I cache.

Linus

Synthetic benchmarks are aren't reliable for different processors, but are for the same processor at different speeds

>Surge S1
>8 a53 cores with a t860 gpu
>Kirin 970
>4 a73 and 4 a53 with a g72 gpu
These are both just ARM IP

Sammy actually has a custom ARM core called mongoose.

Exynos

iphone x is pretty damn good hardware wise but i will never use that garbage shit can called iOS

Ok, where's the real S9 with an Exynos SoC? Memedragons are shit.