When will 16:10 and 4:3 Notebooks come back?
When will 16:10 and 4:3 Notebooks come back?
Ayden Green
Other urls found in this thread:
google.com
eizoglobal.com
twitter.com
Jacob Torres
Never.
Medias are either 21:9 or 16:9.
Aiden Thompson
never.
Expect more of 21:9 with 32:9 coming soon.
Sebastian Morris
watching netflix is not the only think you can do with a laptop, some of us want to code, too
Dominic Wilson
>apple has 16:10
>microsoft has 3:2
Eli Phillips
I want 5:4 monitors to come back, but they're expensive and in black and white. They're used for hospitals. I want a giant square monitor that is HD.
Connor Reed
/thread
Tyler Morris
They sell color 2048 x 2560 monitors which are 5:4, but they're like 11,000 dollars.
Anthony Richardson
Nevermind, the monitor from NEC is greyscale. Fuck. Why can't I buy a 5:4 monitor that isn't over 11,000 dollars.
William Adams
You say this but don't realize that literally almost every laptop is 16:9
Jackson Hughes
But that's it
I don't want a mac or a surface
Brandon Sanders
>literally almost every laptop is 16:9
yeah that is why is want new models. I still use a 16:10 12,5" HP 2540p and don't want a new 16:9 retard model
William Richardson
befor that I had a Thinkpad X61t
Matthew Parker
Both are great choices user but I don't want to get a mac or surface
Cameron Davis
Not the user you replied to, but I don't code. How is 16:10 more comfy than 16:9 when coding?
(i'll just assume that 4:3 is a retard meme but there's a reason people seek 16:10 monitors)
Joseph Sanders
more vertical space, also reading pdfs is much more convenient
Xavier Russell
>1:1 monitor 1920x1920
>Heh? Cool.
>5ms time
No. If it had a faster response time, I would eat that shit up. I like square monitors.
Ryan Jackson
Boo fucking hoo, you fucking faggot.
Gavin Morris
>he doesn't want a 16:16 or even a 1:3 display
portrait-mode laptops when
>tablets in portrait don't count
keyboard must be portrait too.
bonus score for portrait touchpad in the middle of the keyboard
Kayden Walker
After taking the 21:9 pill, I'm never going back to being an aspectratiolet.
Cooper Martinez
4:3 is good.
Brandon Bell
2:1
Adrian Moore
5:4 is beat ngl
Jason Long
>I want a giant square monitor that is HD.
eizoglobal.com
Jacob Nguyen
No offense, but yeah. Some of you want to code. The vast majority wants to watch Netflix and have no black bars.
Tyler Hall
Do you love to scroll through thousands of excel lines?
Lucas Morris
>2540p
>1280x800
Right, that's 16:10, but you realise that pixel count > aspect ratio, right ?
My 1600x900 display can display more lines of code than your 16:10 panel. Until your 16:10 panel is at least 1920x1200, or preferrably 2560x1600 you're only holding yourself back by refusing resolutions that are bigger in both dimensions because they aren't 16:10.
Jason Myers
They never left.
Luis Hall
>and have no black bars.
I can literally not understand this reasoning. In what way do those black bars trigger your small brain? It's just a black bar, it doesn't do anything else, it doesn't insult you, your family or your intellect (it should). It's just a black fucking space that is very convenient to have when doing literally anything than watching your shitty movies. There are probably thousands of more distracting things around that would ruing your viewing experience, yet for you it's black fucking bars. Have you actually ever used 16:10 monitor?
Christopher Peterson
no shit smart ass, that is why I am asking when they will come back.
16:9 Laptops look retarded like shit
Nathan Bell
They will never come back. Ever. If you want 16:10 that badly you can get Macbook Pro. Otherwise a Surface Pro with its 3:2 display.
Anthony Butler
>They will never come back
and that is why?
why did they abandon 4:3 or 16:10?
Kayden Kelly
Because 16:9 is cheaper and in larger supply.
Levi Nelson
yeah but even businees notebooks (1000-2000€) went from 16:10 to 16:9
Eli Collins
And for the same reason.
Aaron Baker
>no one mentions that OP's picture is wrong
Jose Morales
why do 4:3 laptops make it seem like you're remotely detonating a bomb?
Gabriel Sanchez
the 2008 Thinkpad X310 had a 16:10 1440x900 resolution.
When did thing go wrong?
Brayden Perez
16:10, and 4:3, are smaller than 16:9, why would you want that?
Noah Reyes
they are not smaller if they have the diagonal size
James Garcia
it's medium and media not media and mediass
Jason Edwards
>the diagonal
same
Mason Flores
You mean X300.
I don't know that the X310 will have.
Alexander Martinez
15" 4:3 and 14" 16:9 have exactly the same width, but the 4:3 is taller. So which one is better for the same width?
Jeremiah Barnes
yeah
Ian Walker
Theoretically if the war for thin bezels progresses to the chin we could see obscure aspect ratios make a comeback.
Xavier Hughes
Most likely never. People are so dumb nowadays they'll take whatever bullshit they see if it has the word gaming on it
Isaiah Morgan
The closest you can get is 3:2. 4:3 is dead
Jayden Myers
Fucking an hero.