Lets be honest, AyyMD is finished and bankrupt

Lets be honest, AyyMD is finished and bankrupt.
How much time they have left?

Other urls found in this thread:

cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Probably does not matter to scruffy Sup Forumstards who run Nix and glorify window managers. Nice trash thread, little nig nog.

>single thread
dude stop sucking intel cock, jesus.

good i use only one core when i have 4+ available

>AMD somehow not on this list in spite of having provably identical single thread performance at the same clocks
Really makes you think

Synthetic benchmarks for you

>AMD having single thread performance anywhere close to Intel
being this delusional

Lets see the updated benchmarks after Meltdown patches are applied.

Admit it OP, this is from an Intel only benchmark.

Single thread is more important than multiple

Link for AMD cucks
cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html

>1800X behind the G4500
>in spite of being a wide margin ahead in all other benchmarks available
Really gets the noggin joggin

>literally the same shitty xeon jizz part rebranded 500 times
>Intel shills are proud of this

SPECDOWN. ABLOO HOO POOR LITTLE INTFAIL

>posting scores pre-patch

Thats not what the server market says, and thats where all the money is.

that very much depends on the software being used, for example the database jews(Microsoft, Oracle, etc) shifted from a per socket license to a per core one around the time that multicore became a thing, and its been that way ever since. its pretty rough. but for hosting generic hosting yeah you are right.

Amd never even issued a patch for spector v2

They aren't vulnerable to v2 faggot, only v1

i7-8650U has an impressive score for 15W CPU. Is there a point to wait for HQ series if I need single thread performance?

>updated 22nd january

Just buy a single core CPU.

>Implying Microsoft cares what Microsoft charges
Azure is moving to EPYC...
Checkmate Intel.

>tfw single socket ebyn is better then two socket xeon trash

don't see why anyone would buy any newer than sandy bridge considering processors are barely getting faster at this point

>anyone still recommending Jew inside™
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 12:28 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-01-21 at 11:34 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> All of this is pure garbage.
>>
>> Is Intel really planning on making this shit architectural? Has
>> anybody talked to them and told them they are f*cking insane?
>>
>> Please, any Intel engineers here - talk to your managers.
>
> If the alternative was a two-decade product recall and giving everyone
> free CPUs, I'm not sure it was entirely insane.

So your saying intel has better single thread performance than amd. Gee, so it's nothing new.
It's almost as if you would go intel if you prioritize sc performance, and amd if you
want that low cost per core mc cpu.
>AMD somehow not on this list in spite of having provably identical single thread performance at the same clocks
Just as bad as the intel shills, because even if some special snowflake benchmark claims this there aren't any software that reflects those dumb benchmarks as correct.
>inb4 programmers are stupid/lazy, and it's not optimized yet
Well fuck off until they are optimized dickbreath.

This thread is dumb bait. 6/10 for making me reply.