Intellectual property

...

Not your kind of property, hmm??

Well of course a non-intellectual like you wouldn't possess property of value or innovation lmao

no such thing exists

Your piece of land doesn't write physics papers?

Paper Value
Instead of Honour Value
Makes you think

?

Intellectual - can mean intelligently working
Property - used often to mean an immobility (a piece of land)

Check again.

ITT the jew defending government enforced artificial scarcity.

Should expire after a few years

What scarcity?

>ideas are property

Of course. And the alternative is worse.
>boss: Okay, user, we know you have an idea you wanted to keep secret for yourself but we own you and all you come up with, so cough up!
>user: No! Nooo
>boss: ok, it is the cattle prods then!
>HR: we are ready! heh heh
>user Arrrggghhhhhhhhhhhhh!

Eveythin bolon to everyone! gommunism gud

Or
>Happy birthday user! Let's all sing the song!
>*Sings the happy birthday song*
>Gets sued

intellectual property is not technology
at least OP did us a favour and showed us a picture of how retarded he is for making this thread

1.How would that be the alternative?
2.What kind of Anarcho Capitalism are you living In ?

You have it backwards. Intellectual property is antithetical to a truly free market.

Yet another brainwashing term, just like 'piracy'. Brainlet language.

By this post I can tell you don't have that kind of property, right?

Yeah, intellectuality is pretty scarce this days.

>inb4 grammar jokes
*these

Publishers and lawyers like to describe copyright as “intellectual property”—a term also applied to patents, trademarks, and other more obscure areas of law. These laws have so little in common, and differ so much, that it is ill-advised to generalize about them. It is best to talk specifically about “copyright,” or about “patents,” or about “trademarks.”

The term “intellectual property” carries a hidden assumption—that the way to think about all these disparate issues is based on an analogy with physical objects, and our conception of them as physical property.

When it comes to copying, this analogy disregards the crucial difference between material objects and information: information can be copied and shared almost effortlessly, while material objects can't be.

To avoid spreading unnecessary bias and confusion, it is best to adopt a firm policy not to speak or even think in terms of “intellectual property”.